Technological Capability's Predictor Variables

Fernanda Maciel Reichert; Raquel Schramm Beltrame; Kathiane Benedetti Corso; Marcelo Trevisan; Paulo Antônio Zawislak

doi:10.4067/S0718-27242011000100002

Autores/as

Fernanda Maciel Reichert
Raquel Schramm Beltrame
Kathiane Benedetti Corso
Marcelo Trevisan
Paulo Antônio Zawislak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000100002

Resumen

The aim of this study was to identify the factors that influence in configuration of the technological capability of companies in sectors with medium-low technological intensity. To achieve the goal proposed in this article a survey was carried out. Based on the framework developed by Lall (1992) which classifies firms in basic, intermediate and advanced level of technological capability; it was found that the predominant technological capability is intermediate, with 83.7% of respondent companies (plastics companies in Brazil). It is believed that the main contribution of this study is the finding that the dependent variable named “Technological Capability” can be explained at a rate of 65% by six variables: development of new processes; selection of the best equipment supplier; sales of internally developed new technology to third parties; design and manufacture of equipment; study of the work methods and perform inventory control; and improvement of product quality.

Palabras clave:

technological capability
predictor variables
plastics and rubber sector
Brazil

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

AAKER, D. A.; Kumar, V.; Day, G. S. (2004). Pesquisa de Marketing. Atlas, Sao Paulo.

ARNOLD, E.; Thuriaux, B. (1997). Developing Firms' Technological Capabilities. Technopolis Group Report.

AUGIER, M.; Teece, D. J. (2006). Understanding complex organization: the role of know-how, internal structure and human behavior in the evolution of capabilities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15 (2), 395-416.

BELL, M.; Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2 (2), 157-211.

BELL, M.; Pavitt, K. (1995). The development of technological capabilities. In: Haque, I.U. (Ed.), Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness. Economic Development Institute of the World Bank, Washington, 69-100.

CORIAT, B; Dosi, G. (2002) The nature and accumulation of organizational competences/capabilities. Revista Brasi-leira de Inovaqao, 1 (2), 275-326.

DOSI, G. (1988). Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, New York.

ELLONEN, H.; Wikstrom, P.; JANTUNEN, A. (2009). Linking dynamic-capability portfolios and innovation outcomes. Technovation, 29 (11), 753-762.

FIGUEIREDO, P. (2002). Does technological learning pay off? Implications for inter-firm differences in operational performance improvement. Research Policy, 31 (1), 73-94.

FIGUEIREDO, P. (2004). Aprendizagem tecnologica e inovacao industrial em economias emergentes: uma breve contribuicao para o desenho e implementacao de estudos empfricos e estrategias no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Inovaqao, 3 (2), 323-361.

FRANSMAN, M.; King, K. (1987). Technological Capability in the Third World. Macmillan Press, Hong Kong.

FREEMAN, C; Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: what we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38 (4), 583-589.

GARCIA-MUINA, F. E.; Navas-López,J. E. (2007). Explaining and measuring success in new business: the effect of technological capabilities on firm results. Technovation, 27 (1-2), 30-46.

GUJARATI, D. N. (2000). Econometria Basica. Makron Books, Sao Paulo.

INDUSTRIA RS. (2007). 0 polo que gerou polos. Editora Gazeta Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz do Sul.

LALL, S. (1992). Technological Capabilities and Industrialization. World Development, 20 (2), 165-186.

LEVINE, D. M.; Berenson, M. L; Stephan, D. (2000). Estatistica: teoria e aplicacoes. LTC, Rio de Janeiro.

MALHOTRA, N. K. (2006). Pesquisa de Marketing: Uma Orientacao Aplicada. Artmed Editora, Porto Alegre.

OECD. (2005) .Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Stan Indicators. Organization For Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD, Paris.

PANDA, H.; Ramanathan, K. (1996). Technological capability assessment of a firm in the electricity sector. Technovation, 16 (10), 561-588.

PENG, D. X.; Schroeder, R. G.; SHAH. R. (2008). Linking routines to operations capabilities: a new perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 26 (6), 730-748.

PESTANA, M. H.; Gageiro, J. N. (2003). Analise de dados para ciencias sociais: a complementaridade do SPSS. Silabo, Lisboa.

SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper, New York.

SEBRAE. (2010). Servico Brasileiro de Apoio as Micro e Pequenas Empresas Retrieved from the Web 04/06/2010. http://www.sebraesc.com.br/leis/default.asp?vcdtexto=4154&%5E%5E

SINPLAST. (2010). Sindicato das Industrias de Material Plastico no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Retrieved from the Web 28/05/2010. http://www.sinplast.org.br

VEDOVELLO, C; Figueiredo, P. N. (2006). Capacidade tec-nologica industrial e sistema de inovacao. FGV, Rio de Janeiro.