Technological Capability and Firm Performance
Keywords:technological capability, firm economic performance, emerging economy, low-technology intensity
AbstractThis research aims to investigate the relationship between investments in technological capability and economic performance in Brazilian firms. Based on economic development theory and on developed countries history, it is assumed that this relationship is positive. Through key indicators, 133 Brazilian firms have been analyzed. Given the economic circumstances of an emerging economy, which the majority of businesses are primarily based on low and medium-low-technology industries, it is not possible to affirm the existence of a positive relation between technological capability and firm performance. There are other elements that allow firms to achieve such results. Firms of lower technological intensity industries performed above average in the economic performance indicators, adversely, they invested below average in technological capability. These findings do not diminish the merit of firms’ and country’s success. They in fact confirm a historical tradition of a country that concentrates its efforts on basic industries.
ARCHIBUGI, D.; PIANTA, M. (1996). Measuring technological change though patents and innovation surveys. Technovation, 16(9), 451-468.
ARTZ, K.; NORMAN, P.; HATFIELD, D; CARDINAL, L (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 725-740.
BELL, M.; PAVITT, K. (1995). The development of technological capabilities. In: HAQUE, I.U. (1995) Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness. Economic Development Institute of the World Bank, Washington. pp. 69-100.
BELLINGHINI, M. F.; FIGUEIREDO, P. N. (2006). Capacidades tecnológicas e estratégia empresarial: Evidências em nível de empresa da indústria de telefonia no Brasil. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 7(2), 39-60.
BM&FBOVESPA (2010). Setor de Atuação, Empresas Listadas. Retrieved Apr 15 2011 from <http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/Cias-Listadas/Empresas-Listadas/BuscaEmpresaListada.aspx?idioma=pt-br>.
BM&FBOVESPA (2012). Índice Bovespa, Estatísticas históricas. Retrieved Apr 24, 2012 from <http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/indices/EvolucaoMensal.aspx?Indice=Ibovespa&idioma=pt-br>.
CALANTONE, R.; CAVUSGIL, S.; ZHAO, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, form innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 515-524.
CHOI, B.; JONG, A. (2010) Assessing the impact of knowledge management strategies announcements on the market value of firms. Information and Management, 47, 42-52.
COOMBS, J. E.; BIERLY, P. E. (2006) Measuring technological capability and performance. R&D Management, 36(4), 421-438.
DECAROLIS, D.; DEEDS, D. (1999) The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 953-968.
DEHNING, B.; RICHARDSON, V. J.; ZMUD, R. W. (2007). The financial performance effects of IT-based supply chain management systems in manufacturing firms, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 806-824.
DOSI, G. (1998) Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1120-1171.
EHIE, I.; OLIBE, K. (2010). The effect of R&D investment on firm value: An examination of US manufacturing and service industries. International Journal Production Economics, 128, 127-135.
FIGUEIREDO, P. (2009). Gestão da Inovação: conceitos, métricas e experiências de empresas no Brasil. LTC, Rio de Janeiro.
GARCÍA-MUIÑA, F.; NAVAS-LÓPEZ, J. (2007). Explaining and measuring success in new business: the effect of technological capabilities on ﬁrm results. Technovation, 27, 30-46.
GRILICHES, Z. (1998). R&D Productivity: the econometric evidence. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
GUAN, J.; YAM, R.; MOK, C.; MA, N. (2006). A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, 170, 971-986.
HAIR, J.; BABIN, B.; MONEY, A.; SAMOUEL, P. (2005). Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Bookman, Porto Alegre.
HALL, L.; BAGCHI-SEN, S. (2002). A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry. Technovation, 22, 231-244.
INPI – Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Intelectual (2011). Consulta à Base de Patentes do INPI. Retrieved Nov. and Dec. 01, 2011 from <http://pesquisa.inpi.gov.br/MarcaPatente/jsp/servimg/validamagic.jsp?BasePesquisa=Patentes>.
ISOBE, T.; MAKINO, S.; MONTGOMERY, D. (2008). Technological capabilities, and firm performance: The case of small manufacturing firms in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 413-428.
JIN, J.; VON ZEDTWITZ, M. (2008) Technological capability development in China’s mobile phone industry. Technovation, 28, 327-334.
KIM, L. (1999). Building technological capability for industrialization: analytical frameworks and Korea’s experience. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 11-136.
LALL, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165-186.
MADANMOHAN, T.; KUMAR, U.; KUMAR, V. (2004). Import-led technological capability: a comparative analysis of Indian and Indonesian manufacturing firms. Technovation, 24, 979-993.
NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. (2005). Uma teoria evolucionária da mudança econômica. UNICAMP, Campinas.
OECD (2005). Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Stan Indicators (2005 edition).
OECD (2011). Technology intensity definition. ISIC rev. 3. Retrieved Apr 01, 2012 from
PANDA, H.; RAMANATHAN, K. (2006). Technological capability assessment of a firm in the electricity sector. Technovation, 16(10), 561-588.
PAVITT, K. (1998). Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: what Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn’t. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 433-452.
REICHERT, F. M; BELTRAME, R.; CORSO, K.; TREVISAN, M.; ZAWISLAK, P. (2011). Technological Capality’s Predictor Variables. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(1), 14-25.
RUFFONI, J.; STEFFANELLO, M.; REICHERT, F.; DE ROSSI, G.; PUFAL, N. (2012, August). Footwear industry innovation capability: Southern Brazilian evidence. Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Boston, 1-32.
SCHUMPETER, J. ( 2008a). The Theory of Economic Development. Transaction, New Jersey.
SCHUMPETER, J. ( 2008b). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper Perennial Modern Thought, New York.
SEBRAE. Retrieved May 01, 2012 from <http://www.sebraesp.com.br/TenhoUmaEmpresa/Biblioteca/OutrosConteudos/EstudosEPesquisas/MPEsEmNumeros/Paginas/MPEsEmNumeros.aspx>, 2012.
SIRMON, D.; HITT, M.; IRELAND, R. (2007) Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273-292.
TEECE, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-305.
TIGRE, P. A. (1998). Inovação e teorias da firma em três paradigmas. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, 3, 67-111.
TSAI, K. (2004). The impact of technological capability on firm performance in Taiwan’s electronics industry. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15, 183-195.
WANG, E. (2007). R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29, 345-360.
YAM, R.; GUAN, J.; PUN, K.; TANG, E. (2004). An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33, 1123-1140.
ZAWISLAK, P.; ALVES, A.; TELLO-GAMARRA, J.; BARBIEUX, D.; REICHERT, F. (2012). Innovation capability: from technology development to transaction capability. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(2), 14-27.
ZAWISLAK, P. A., ZEN, A. C., FRACASSO, E. M., REICHERT, F. M. and PUFAL, N. A. (2013). Types of innovation in low-technology firms of emerging markets: an empirical study in Brazilian Industry. Revista de Administração e Inovação, 10(1), 212-231.
How to Cite