Universities’ Intellectual Property: Path for Innovation or Patent Competition?
Keywords:university patent, technology transfer office, open innovation
AbstractTechnological innovation is represented by the conversion of knowledge into new products and processes which, when commercialized, generate wealth. In relations with companies, universities’ role is to develop scientific knowledge, fostering industry’s R&D activities. This article proposes an analysis of the technology transfer process performed by public universities in Brazil. Results demonstrate that universities are facing difficulties in requesting and licensing patents based on scientific results, due to lack of commercial contact with companies and their limitations in adapting available technologies. The increase in scientific output is not being effectively transformed into new technologies for products and services, exposing the necessity for new policies to approach university-industry relations. For universities, this may mean rethinking the role of patents in the technology transfer process, such as increasing co-authorship with companies and have companies support technological research within the university, instead of investing in legal protection, distant from market needs.
AMADEI, J.R.P., Torkomian, A.L.V. (2009) As patentes nas universidades: análise dos depósitos das universidades públicas paulistas. Ci. Inf., Brasilia, 38(2), 9-18.
ANDERSON, T.R., Daim, T.U., Lavoie, F.F. (2007). Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation 27(5), 306-318.
AUERSWALD, P., Branscomb, L., Demos, N., Min, B.K. (2005). Understanding private-sector decision making for early-stage technology development: a "between invention and innovation project." Report No. NIST GCR 02-841A. National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce. http://www.atp.nist.gov/eao/ gcr02-841 a/gcr02-841 a.pdf [Accessed January, 10 2009].
BRASIL, Presidencia da República (2004). Lei 10.973, de 2 de Dezembro de 2004.
BRAY, M.J., Lee, J.N. (2000) University Revenues from Technology Transfer: Licensing Fees vs. Equity Positions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 385-392.
CHESBROUGH, H., Crowther, A.K. (2006) Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236.
CHESBROUGH, H.W. (2006) Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (eds), Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOSI, G. (1988) The nature of the innovative process. in: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Soete, L. (eds.). Technical Change and Economic Theory. London, Pinter.
ETZKOWITZ, H. (2001) The Second Academic Revolution and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(2), 18-29.
ETZKOWITZ, H. (2003) Innovation in Innovation: The triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337.
ETZKOWITZ, H., Mello, J.M.C., Almeida, M. (2005) Towards "meta-innovation" in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 34(4), 411-424.
EUN, J-H., Lee, K., Wu, G. (2006) Explaining the "University-run enterprises" in China: A theoretical framework for university-industry relationship in developing countries and its application to China. Research Policy, 35(9), 1329-1346.
GARNICA, L.A., Torkomian, A.L.V. (2009) GestSo de tecnologia em universidades: uma análise do patenteamento e dos fatores de dificuldade e de apoio à transferencia de tecnologia no Estado de SSo Paulo. GestSo & ProducSo, 16(4), 624-638.
HELLMANN, T. (2007) The role of patents for bridging the science to market gap. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 63(4), 624-647.
IBGE - Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (2010). Grau de novidade do principal produto e/ou do principal processo nas empresas que implementaram inovacòes, segundo as atividades das indústrias extrativas e de transformacSo - Brasil - período 2006-2008. Pesquisa de InovacSo Tecnológica 2008. http://www.pintec.ibge.gov. br/downloads/PUBLICACAO/PublicacaoPINTEC2008. pdf http://www.pintec.ibge.gov. br/downloads/PUBLICACAO/PublicacaoPINTEC2008. pdf [Acessed May, 11 2011].
JACOBIDES, M.G., Winter, S.G. (2003) Capabilities, Transaction Costs, and Evolution: Understanding the Institutional Structure of Production. WP 2003-04, Working Paper of the Reginald H. Jones Center. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
KING, C. (2009) Brazilian Science on the Rise. National Science Indicators. Thomson Reuters. http://sciencewatch. com/ana/fea/09julaugFea/ . [Acessed September, 19 2010].
LEMLEY, M.A. (2007) Are Universities Patent Trolls? Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 18(3), 611-631.
LEONARD, D., Sensiper, S. (1998) The role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. California Management Review. 40(3), 112-132.
MACHO-STADLER, I., Pérez-Castrillo, D., Veugelers, R. (2007) Licensing of university inventions: The role of a technology transfer office. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(3) 483-510.
MARGLIN, S.A. (1990) Loosing touch: the cultural conditions of worker accommodation and resistance. in: Marglin, F.A., Marglin, D. Dominating Knowledge: Development, Culture, and Resistance. Ed. Oxford.
MCT - Ministry of Science and Technology. (2010) Número de artigos brasileiros, da América Latina e do mundo publicados em periódicos científicos indexados pela Thomson/ISI, 1981-2009. http://www.mct.gov.br/index. php/content/view/57l0.html. [Accessed March, 19 2010].
MOWERY, D.C., Rosenberg, N. (1989). Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press.
MOWERY, D.C., Sampat, B.N., Ziedonis, A.A. (2002). Learning to patent: institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of U.S. University Patents after the Bayh-Dole act, 1981-1992. Management Science 48(1), 73-89.
NELSON, R.R. (1959) The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research. The Journal of Political Economy. 67(3), 297-306.
NELSON, R.R., Rosenberg, N. (1993) Technological Innovation and National Systems. In: Nelson, RR. (Ed). National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Study. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
OLIVEIRA, R. M., Velho, L. M. L. S. (2009) Patentes académicas no Brasil: uma análise sobre as universidades públicas paulistas e seus inventores. Parcerias Estratégicas, CGEE, 14(29), 173-200.
PERKMANN, M., Walsh, K. (2007) University-Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. 9(4), 259-280.
PÓVOA, L. M. C. (2008) Patentes de universidades e institutos públicos de pesquisa e a transferencia de tecnologia para empresas no Brasil. Doctoral Thesis. Belo Horizonte: UFMG. http://www.cedeplar.ufmg.br/ economia/teses/2008/Luciano_Povoa.pdf [Accessed September, 21 2009].
PÓVOA, L. M. C. (2010). A universidade deve patentear suas invencòes? Revista Brasileira de InovacSo, 9(2), 231-256.
WINTER, S. (1988) On Coase, Competence, and the Corporation. The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization. 4(1), 163-180.
QUERIDO, A.L.S., Lage, C.L.S., Vasconcellos, A.G. (2011) What is the Destiny of Patents of Brazilian Universities? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. 6(1), 46-57.
YIN, R. K. (2003) Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 2 e.d. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
SÁBATO, J.A., Botana, N. (1975) La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América latina. In: Sabato, J. A. El pensamiento latinoamericano em la problemática:
ZAWISLAK, P.A. (l995) RelacSo entre Conhecimento e Desenvolvimento: esséncia do progresso técnico. Análise, Porto Alegre, 6(1), 125-149. ciencia, tecnología, desarrollo e dependencia. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
SHANE, S., Somaya, D. (2007) The effects of patent litigation on university licensing efforts. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 63(4) 739-755.
SIEGEL, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., Link, A.N. (2003) Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research. 14(1), 111-133.
SIEGEL, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., Link, A.N. (2004) Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 21(1-2), 115-142.
SIEGEL, D.S., Veugelers, R., Wright, M. (2007) Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640-660.
SPITHOVEN, A., Clarysse, B., Knockaert, M. (2010) Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation, 30(2),130-141.
THURSBY, J.G., Thursby, M.C. (2007) University licensing. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 620-639.
TODTLING, F., Lehner, P., Kaufmann, A. (2009) Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, 29(1), 59-71.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).