Barriers to Open Innovation: Case China
Keywords:Open innovation, markets for technology, intellectual property rights, national culture, China
AbstractThe notion of open innovation suggests that firms can boost their innovative performance by both acquiring knowledge from outside the company and deploying external paths to market for commercialization of non-core technologies. As innovations emerge increasingly from interorganisational cooperation, the background for such cooperation can also have an impact on the involvement of companies into open innovation processes. Thereby this paper proposes to analyze the barriers towards open innovation from three different aspects, such as internal firms’ environment, institutional factors or innovation system and cultural background. Our findings indicate that economic systems and institutions (in particular the protection of IPRs) may have large effects on the behavior of firms with respect to their engagement in open innovation practices. On the other hand, our results also suggest that the importance of appropriability regime may differ in the buy and sell sides of knowledge, and finally we demonstrate the influence of peculiarities of national cultures upon the adoption of certain elements of open innovation model.
ARORA, A. (1997). Patents, licensing, and market structure in the chemical industry. Research Policy 26 (4-5), 391-403.
ATHREYE, S., Cantwell, J. (2007). Creating competition? Globalisation and the emergence of new technology producers. Research Policy, 36, 209-226.
BRACZYK, H.J., Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. (Eds.) (1998). Regional innovation systems: the role of governance in a globalised world. London: UCL Press
BRESNAHAN, T., Malerba, F. (1999). Industrial Dynamics and the Evolution of Firms' and Nations' Competitive Capabilities in the World Compute Industry', in D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (Eds.) Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries. New York: Cambridge University Press, 79-132.
BUISSERET, T.J., Cameron, H., Georghiou, L. (1995). What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms'. International Journal of Technology Management, 10 (4/5/6), 587-600.
CHESBROUGH, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
CHESBROUGH, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. USA: Oxford University Press.
DAVENPORT, S., Grimes, C, Davies, J. (1998). 'Research collaboration and behavioural additionality: a New Zealand case study', Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(1), 55-67.
DWYER, S., Mesak, H., Hsu M. (2005). An Exploratory Examination of the Influence of National Culture on Cross- National Product Diffusion, Journal of International Marketing 13(2), 1-27.
Gassmann, O. and Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes, Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference (RADMA), Lisbon, Portugal, July 6-9, 2004.
GRAHAM, S.J.H., Mowery, D.C. (2004). Submarines in Software? Continuations in US Software Patenting in the 1980s and 1990s. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(5), 443-456
GRANSTRAND, O., Bohlin, E., Oskarsson, C, Sjoberg, N. (1992). External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations. R&D Management, 22, 1 1 1 -1 33.
GU, S., Lundvall, B-A. (2006). Policy learning as a key process in the transformation of the Chinese Innovation Systems, in Lundvall, B-A, Intarakumnerd, P. and Vang, J. (eds): Asian innovation systems in transition, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
HOFFMANN, W.H., Schlosser, R. (2001). Success factors of strategic alliances in small and medium-sized enterprises: an empirical survey. Long Range Planning, 34, 357-381.
HOFSTEDE, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Book Company Europe
HOFSTEDE, G. H. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, Sage Publications, 2nd Edition
HUSTON, L, Sakkab, N. (2006). Connect and Develop: Inside Procter & Gamble's new model for Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84 (3), 58-66.
KRUGMAN, P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
KUROKAWA, S. (1997). Make-or-buy decisions in R&D: small technology based firms in the United States and Japan. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44, 124-134.
LUNDVALL, B-A. (ed) (1992). National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter: London.
MALERBA, F., Orsenigo, L (1993). Technological regimes and firm behaviour, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(1), 45-71.
MENDI, P. (2007) Trade in disembodied technology and total factor productivity in OECD countries, Research Policy, 36, 121-133.
MILLER, W.L, Langdon, M. (1999) Fourth Generation R&D: managing knowledge, technology and innovation. John Willey & Sons, Inc., USA.
NARULA, R., Hagerdoorn, J. (1999). Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements, Techonovation, 19, 283-294.
NELSON, R.R. (ed) (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
NELSON, R.R., Rosenberg, N. (1993) Technical Innovation and National Systems. In: Nelson, R.R. (ed) National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 3-21.
PIPEROPOULOS, P., Scase, R. (2009). Competitiveness of small and medium sized enterprises: towards a two dimensional model of innovation and business clusters. Int. J. Business Innovation and Research, 3 (5), 479-499.
PORTER, M.E., Stern, S. (2001) Innovation: Location matters, MIT Sloan management review, 42 (4), 28-36.
ROMER P.M. (1987). Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization, American Economic Review, 77 (2), 56-86
SEPETYS, K., Cox, A. (2009). China: Intellectual Property Rights Protection in China: Trends In Litigation and Economic Damages, NERA Economic Consulting
STRAUB, D. W. (1994). The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S", Information Systems Research, 5(1), 23-47.
TAKADA, H., Jain, D. (1991). Cross-national analysis of diffusion of consumer durable goods in Pacific Rim countries", Journal of Marketing 55(2), 48-55.
TEECE, D.J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.
VEUGELERS, R., Cassiman, B. (1999) Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms, Research Policy, 28, 63-80.
WEST, J., Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H.W. (2006). Open Innovation: a research agenda, in Chesbrough, H.W., Vahnaverbeke W., West, J. (Eds.) Open Innovation: researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 285-307.
ZHANG, G. (2005). Promoting IPR Policy and Enforcement in China: Summary of OECD-China Dialogues on Intellectual Property Rights Policy and Enforcement, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2005/1, OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).