Technological Capability's Predictor Variables

Fernanda Maciel Reichert, Raquel Schramm Beltrame, Kathiane Benedetti Corso, Marcelo Trevisan, Paulo Antônio Zawislak

Abstract


The aim of this study was to identify the factors that influence in configuration of the technological capability of companies in sectors with medium-low technological intensity. To achieve the goal proposed in this article a survey was carried out. Based on the framework developed by Lall (1992) which classifies firms in basic, intermediate and advanced level of technological capability; it was found that the predominant technological capability is intermediate, with 83.7% of respondent companies (plastics companies in Brazil). It is believed that the main contribution of this study is the finding that the dependent variable named “Technological Capability” can be explained at a rate of 65% by six variables: development of new processes; selection of the best equipment supplier; sales of internally developed new technology to third parties; design and manufacture of equipment; study of the work methods and perform inventory control; and improvement of product quality.

Keywords


technological capability; predictor variables; plastics and rubber sector; Brazil

Full Text:

PDF [en]

References


AAKER, D. A.; Kumar, V.; Day, G. S. (2004). Pesquisa de Marketing. Atlas, Sao Paulo.

ARNOLD, E.; Thuriaux, B. (1997). Developing Firms' Technological Capabilities. Technopolis Group Report.

AUGIER, M.; Teece, D. J. (2006). Understanding complex organization: the role of know-how, internal structure and human behavior in the evolution of capabilities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15 (2), 395-416.

BELL, M.; Pavitt, K. (1993). Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2 (2), 157-211.

BELL, M.; Pavitt, K. (1995). The development of technological capabilities. In: Haque, I.U. (Ed.), Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness. Economic Development Institute of the World Bank, Washington, 69-100.

CORIAT, B; Dosi, G. (2002) The nature and accumulation of organizational competences/capabilities. Revista Brasi-leira de Inovaqao, 1 (2), 275-326.

DOSI, G. (1988). Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, New York.

ELLONEN, H.; Wikstrom, P.; JANTUNEN, A. (2009). Linking dynamic-capability portfolios and innovation outcomes. Technovation, 29 (11), 753-762.

FIGUEIREDO, P. (2002). Does technological learning pay off? Implications for inter-firm differences in operational performance improvement. Research Policy, 31 (1), 73-94.

FIGUEIREDO, P. (2004). Aprendizagem tecnologica e inovacao industrial em economias emergentes: uma breve contribuicao para o desenho e implementacao de estudos empfricos e estrategias no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Inovaqao, 3 (2), 323-361.

FRANSMAN, M.; King, K. (1987). Technological Capability in the Third World. Macmillan Press, Hong Kong.

FREEMAN, C; Soete, L. (2009). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: what we can learn from the past. Research Policy, 38 (4), 583-589.

GARCIA-MUINA, F. E.; Navas-López,J. E. (2007). Explaining and measuring success in new business: the effect of technological capabilities on firm results. Technovation, 27 (1-2), 30-46.

GUJARATI, D. N. (2000). Econometria Basica. Makron Books, Sao Paulo.

INDUSTRIA RS. (2007). 0 polo que gerou polos. Editora Gazeta Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz do Sul.

LALL, S. (1992). Technological Capabilities and Industrialization. World Development, 20 (2), 165-186.

LEVINE, D. M.; Berenson, M. L; Stephan, D. (2000). Estatistica: teoria e aplicacoes. LTC, Rio de Janeiro.

MALHOTRA, N. K. (2006). Pesquisa de Marketing: Uma Orientacao Aplicada. Artmed Editora, Porto Alegre.

OECD. (2005) .Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Stan Indicators. Organization For Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD, Paris.

PANDA, H.; Ramanathan, K. (1996). Technological capability assessment of a firm in the electricity sector. Technovation, 16 (10), 561-588.

PENG, D. X.; Schroeder, R. G.; SHAH. R. (2008). Linking routines to operations capabilities: a new perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 26 (6), 730-748.

PESTANA, M. H.; Gageiro, J. N. (2003). Analise de dados para ciencias sociais: a complementaridade do SPSS. Silabo, Lisboa.

SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper, New York.

SEBRAE. (2010). Servico Brasileiro de Apoio as Micro e Pequenas Empresas Retrieved from the Web 04/06/2010. http://www.sebraesc.com.br/leis/default.asp?vcdtexto=4154&%5E%5E

SINPLAST. (2010). Sindicato das Industrias de Material Plastico no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Retrieved from the Web 28/05/2010. http://www.sinplast.org.br

VEDOVELLO, C; Figueiredo, P. N. (2006). Capacidade tec-nologica industrial e sistema de inovacao. FGV, Rio de Janeiro.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000100002



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.


2014 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile - Teléfono (56-2) 8897356
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Documentos de Investigación |E-mail Admin|

Journal Supported by Chimera Innova Group