Managerial Perspective on Open Source Collaboration and Networked Innovation
AbstractThis study explores the managerial perspectives towards open source software and networked innovation. We analysed six software companies who use open source software as a significant part of their product or service offering. The study found notable differences in managerial attitudes, expected benefits and key challenges related to open source software and its role in innovative activities. While all companies were using same pieces of software with open source communities, there were different levels of engagement in the development of the software and information flows between companies and communities. A deeper level of involvement enables the exchange of more than just the code: like ideas, influences, opinions and even innovations or parts of them. The differences in managerial views on open source and networked innovation may be explained by industry domains, value chain position and leadership style
BADEN-FULLER, C. (2004). A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 1467-6486.
BONACCORSI, A. Rossi, C. Giannangeli, S. (2004). Adaptive Entry Strategies under Dominant Standards - Hybrid Business Models in the Open Source Software Industry. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-23.
BRYMAN A. (2008). Social Research Methods.Third Edition. Oxford University Press, New York.
CHESBROUGH H. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard University Press, Boston.
CHESBROUGH, H (2006). Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Harvard University Press, Boston.
CHETTY, S. (1996). The case study method for research in small and medium sized firms. International Small Business Journal 15(1), 73–85.
COHEN W. Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D.The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596.
DAHLANDER, L. (2005). Appropriation and appropriable in open source software. International Journal of Innovation Management, 9(3), 259-285.
DAHLANDER, L. (2007). Penguin in a new suit: a tale of how de novo entrants emerged to harness free and open source software communities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(5), 913-943.
DAHLANDER, L. Magnusson M. (2005). Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Research Policy, 34(4), 481-493.
DYER, J (2000). Collaborative Advantage: Winning Through Extended Enterprise. Oxford University Press, New York.
FAVARO, J. Pfleeger, S. (2011). Software as a Business. IEEE Software, 28(4), 22-25.
FLYVBERG, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), pp-245.
GRAND, S. Von Krogh, G. Leonard, D. Swap, W. (2004) Resource allocation beyond firm boundaries: A multi-level model for Open Source innovation. Long Range Planning, 37(6), 591-610.
HAGEL, J. Brown J. (2011) Creation nets: harnessing the potential of open innovation. Journal of Service Science, 1(2), 27-40.
HECKER, F. (2009). Setting Up Shop :The Business of Open- Source Software. IEEE Software,16(1), 45-51.
HENKEL, J. (2006). Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux. Research Policy, 35(7), 953-969.
HOPNER, J. (2004).The GPL prevails:An analysis of the first- ever Court decision on the validity and effective of the GPL. SCRIPT-ed, 1(4), 628-635.
HENTTONEN, K. Matinlassi, M. (2007). Contributing to Eclipse - a case study. Proceedings of the Software Engineering 2007 Conference (SE2007). Hamburg, Germany, 27-30 March, 2007.
HENTTONEN, K. (2011). Libre Software as an Innovation Enabler in India: Experiences of a Bangalorian Software SME . In: Hissam S. Russo B. (Eds.), Open Source Systems: Grounding Research. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology,Volume 365, Springer, Boston. pp. 220-232.
HIPPEL, E (2003). Open source software and the private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization science, 209-223.
HIPPEL, E (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
IDRISSIA, M.Amaraa, N. Landrya, R. (2012) SMEs’ Degree of Openness: The Case of Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(1), 186-210.
KEUPP, M. Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&D Management, 39(4), 331-341.
KING, N. (1998) Template analysis. In: Symon G. Cassell C. (Eds.), Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications, California. pp. 118-134.
KOSKELA K. Koivumäki T. Näkki P. (2011) Art of opennesses. In: Pikkarainen M. Codenie W. Boucart N. Heredia J. (Eds.), The Art of Software Innovation, Springer, Berlin. pp. 57-68.
KROGH G., Spaeth S. Lakhani K. (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study. Research Policy, 32 (7), pp. 1217–1241
LERNER, J.Tirole, J. (2002). Some Simple Economics of Open Source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197-234.
LUNDEL, B. Ling, B. Lindqvist, E. (2006). Perceptions and up-take of open source in Swedish organisations In: Damiani, E. Fitzgerald B. Scacchi, W. Scotto M. Succi G. (Eds.) Open Source Systems, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing,Volume 203, Springer, Boston. pp. 155-153.
LUOMA T. Paasi J.Valkokari, K. (2010). Intellectual property in inter-organizational relationships - Findings from an inter- view study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(3), 399–414.
McGOWAN, D. (2005) Legal aspects of free and open source software, In: Feller J. Fitzgerald B., Hissam S., Lakhani K. (Eds.), Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software, MIT Press, London. pp. 211–226.
MÄKI-AISALA, P., Matinlassi M. (2006). Quality Assurance of Open Source Components: Integrator Point of View. Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Second International Workshop on Testing and Quality Assurance for Component-Based Systems, Chicago, September 17-21, 2OO6, 189 - 192.
NYMAN, L. Mikkonen, T. (2011). To Fork or Not to Fork: Fork Motivations in SourceForge Projects. International Journal of Open Source Software and Processes, 3(3), 1-9.
OKSANEN, V. (2006). State of Art on Legal research on FLOSS. In: Helender N. Martin-Vanhanen H. (Eds.), Multi-disciplinary Views to Open Source Software Business. BRC Research Report #33.Tampere University of Technology and the University of Tampere,Tampere. pp. 10–19.
PAASI, J. Luoma T. Valkokari, K. (2010). Knolwedge and In- tellectual property management in customer supplyer relationships. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 629–654.
SANCHEZ, A. Lago, A. Ferràs X. Ribera J. (2011). Innovation Management Practices, Strategic Adaptation, and Business Results: Evidence from the Electronics Industry. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation , 2(6), 14-39.
SAVITSKAYA J., Salmi P,Torkkeli M. (2010). Barriers to Open Innovation: Case China. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 5(4), 10-21.
SPILLER, D., Wichmann, T. (2002). Floss Final Report – Part 3: Basics of Open Source Software Markets and Business Models. University of Maastricht, Netherlands.
STAM, W. (2009). When does community participation en-hance the performance of open source software companies? Research Policy, 38(8), 1288-1299.
TUOMI, I. (2002). Networks of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
VALKOKARI, K. Paasi J. Luoma T. Ling, N. (2009). Beyond open innovation: The concept of networked innovation. In: Huizing, K. Conns, S. Torkkeli M. Bitran, I. (Eds) Stimulating Recovery - The Role of Innovation Managemen, International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), New York.
WEST, J. (2007).Value Capture and Value Networks in Open Source Vendor Strategies. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), January 2007.
WEST, J. Gallagher, S. (2006a) Patterns of Open innovation in open source software development. In: Chesbrough, H. Vanhaverbeke W.West J. (Eds.), Open innovation:researching a new paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
West, J. Gallagher S. (2006b). Challenges of Open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open source software. R&D Management, 36(2), 316-331 .
YE, Y. Kishida, K. (2003). Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers. The proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE’03), 3-10 May 2003, 419- 429.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).