A Causal Decision Making Model for Knowledge Management Capabilities to Innovation Performance in Taiwan’s High-Tech Industry
Keywords:Innovation Performance, Knowledge management capabilities, High-tech industry, DEMATEL
AbstractR&D and innovation is the source of technology companies’ profit. If companies cannot be smoothly implemented technological innovation and R&D investments, then they can not strengthen their competitiveness. In the light of dynamic capabilities and absorptive capacities, we need an effective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) analysis tools to assess the impact of organizational innovation and performance factors so that we can promote organizational innovation performance requires. This study used multiple criteria decision analysis method- DEMATEL, how influence as innovation performance on knowledge management capabilities of high-tech industry. Result of this study, enterprises can access external knowledge and make amendments to the operating principle effectively and immediately, when enhanced absorptive capabilities. Moreover, enhancing absorption capabilities will lead the improvement of dynamic capabilities to adapt to the rapidly changing competitive environment.
BUYUKOZKAN, G. and Ozturkcan, D. (2010). An integrated analytic approach for Six Sigma project selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 5835-5847.
CHEN, J. K., Chen, I. S. (2010). Using a novel conjunctive MCE approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 1981-1990.
CHESBROUGH, H.W. (2006). Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape. Harvard Business School Press, New York.
CHIESA, V., Frattini, F., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R. (2009). Performance measurement in R&D: exploring the interplay between measurement objectives, dimensions of performance and contextual factors. R&D Management, 39(5), 488-519.
CHRISTENSEN, C. M., Suarez, F. F., Utterback, J. M. (1998). Strategies for Survival in Fast Changing Industries. Management Science, 44(12), S207-S220.
COHEN, W. N., Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capabilities: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 1128-1152.
COOPER, R. G., Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1996). Winning business in product development: the critical success factors. Research-Technology Management, 39, 18-29.
DAMANPOUR, F., Walker, R. M., Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 1467-6486.
GABUS, A., Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the world problematique: Communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility (DEMATEL report I). Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Switzerland Geneva.
KIVIMAEKI, M, LaE nsisalmi, H., Elovainio, M., HeikkilaE, A., LindstroEm, K., Harisalo, R., SipilaE, K., Puolimatka, L. (2000). Communication as a determinant of organizational innovation. R&D Management, 30(1), 33-42.
NONAKA, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.
NONAKA, I., Konno, N. (1998). The concept of "Ba": Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Rew'ew, 40(3), 40-54.
OLSON, E.M., Walker, O.C., Ruekert, R.W. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: the moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 1, 48-62.
OU YANG, Y. P., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., Tzeng, G. H. (2008). A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research, 5(3), 1-9.
QUINN, J. B. (1999). Strategic Outsourcing: Leveraging Knowledge Capabilities. Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 9-21.
SZULANSKI, G. (1996). Exporting Internal Stickness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-33.
TEECE, D. J. (1986). Transaction Cost Economics and the Multinational Enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7, 21 -45.
TEECE, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
TEECE, D. J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: the Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
THAMHAIN, H.J. (2003). Managing innovative R&D teams. R&D Management, 33(3), 297-311.
TSENG, M. L (2009). Using the extension of DEMATEL to integrate hotel service quality perceptions into a cause-effect model in uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5), 9015-9023.
TZENG, G. H., Chiang, C. H., Li, C.W. (2007). Evaluating Intertwined Effects in e-Learning Programs: A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Based on Factor Analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
WALLIN, M. W., Krogh, G. V. (2010). Organizing for Open Innovation: Focus on the Integration of Knowledge. Organizational Dynamics, in press.
WU, W. W. (2008). Choosing Knowledge Management Strategies by Using A Combined ANP and DEMATEL Approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 828-835.
ZAHRA, S. A., George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capabilities: a Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
Accepted November 10, 2010
How to Cite