Patent Quality and Pro-patent Policy
AbstractThis paper analyzes the patent examination and litigation process in terms of a simple Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium model, and interprets the results in line with real pro-patent trends in the US and other countries. Each country’s pro-patent policy option is different from the other because of reflecting its own path-dependent patent situation. That is, when a country adopts an easy patent policy (a pro-patent policy), firms in the country gain larger payoffs in the short term. Hence, every country seeks to adopt an easy patent policy. However, the easy patent policy undermines the true invention incentive. In this situation, it is difficult for any country to escape the problem, depending on the historical inertia.
CAILLAUD, B., Duchene, A. (2010). Patent Office in Innovation Policy: Nobody's Perfect, International Journal of Industrial Organization, forthcoming.
CHIOU, J.-Y. (2008). The Patent Quality Control Process: Can We Afford An (Rationally) Ignorant Patent Office? SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1099948 [Accessed 12/11/2010].
FARRELL, J., Shapiro C. (2008). How strong are weak patents? American Economic Review 98, I 347-1 369.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (2003). To Promote Innovation: A Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy.
LEMLEY, M. (2001). Rational ignorance at the patent office, Northwestern University Law Review 95, 1495-1529.
LEMLEY, M., Shapiro C. (2005). Probabilistic patents, Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, 75-98.
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (2004). A Patent System for the 21st Century.
Policy Committee on Innovation and Intellectual Property of Japan Patent Office (2008) New Intellectual Property Policy for Pro-Innovation - Intellectual Property System as Global Infrastructure-.
SHAPIRO, C. (2003). Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements, RAND Journal of Economics 34, 391-41 I.
TAKAKURA, S. (2008). Review of the Recent Trend in Patent Litigation from the Viewpoint of Innovation, http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/columns/aO I 0242.html [Accessed 12/11/2010].
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (2003). The 21st Century Strategic Plan, http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/strat21 /index.htm
YASUDA, F. (2010). Outline of Patent Prosecution Highway, (in Japanese), http://www.jpo.go.Jp/torikumi/t torikumi/pdf/highway user seminar/jpo happyo.pdf [Accessed 12/1 1/2010].
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).