A Proposal of Indicators and Policy Framework for Innovation Benchmark in Europe
AbstractThe implementation of innovation policies has been adopted at European level from a common perspective. The European Council (2000) established open methods of coordination (OMC) in order to gain mutual understanding and achieving greater convergence on innovation policies, constituting a benchmarking procedure.
However, the development of benchmarking analysis for innovation policies faces two major inconveniences: the lack of accepted innovation policy frameworks and the existence of suitable indicators to measure their performance.
This article has a twofold objective: on the one hand, conducting an analysis of the existing innovation policy frameworks, putting forward a set of innovation policies which could be used as reference for policy analysis and on the other hand, proposing a set of indicators for measuring their performance.
ALMUS, M., Czarnitski, D. (2003). The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21(2), pp. 226-236.
ARUNDEL, A., Hollanders, H. (2005). Policy, Indicators and Targets: Measuring the Impacts of Innovation Policies, European Trend Chart of Innovation. MERIT. Maastricht.
BALAZ, V., Kluvankova, T., Zajac, S. (2005). Conceptual economic issues of regional innovations. Institute for Forecasting, Slovak Academy of Science.
BELDERBOS, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B. and Veugelers, R. (2003). Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies. CEPR Discussion paper DP4021. CEPR, London.
BERGEK, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmarki, S., Rickne, A. (2005). Analysing the dynamics and functionality of sectoral innovation systems - a manual. 10 Year Anniversary DRUID Summer Conference, June 27-29, Copenhagen.
BERGER, G. (2005). Benchmarking for Innovation Policy-Making - A Literature Review. ICCR
BUSOM, I. (2000). An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. Economic Innovation and New Technology, 9, pp. 111-148.
CARLSSON, B., Jacobsson, S. (1997). In search of useful public policies: key lessons and issues for policy makers, in Carlsson (ed.), Technological Systems and Industrial Dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
CHAMINADE, C., Edquist, C. (2005). From Theory to Practice: The Use of Systems of Innovation Approach in Innovation Policy. Lund University, Lund.
COOKE, P., Schienstock, G. (2000). Structural competitiveness and learning regions. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(3), pp. 265-280.
COOKE, P., Uranga, M.G., Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: institutional and organizational dimensions, Research Policy, 26, pp. 475-491.
CZARNITZKI, D., Fier, A. (2001). Do R&D Subsidies Matter? - Evidence from the German Service Sector, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 01-19. ZEW, Mannheim.
EDQUIST, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: perspectives and challenges. In: Fagerberg, Mowery and Nelson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 181-208. Oxford University Press, New York.
EDQUIST, C., Hommen, L., Johnson, B., Lemola, T., Malerba, F., Reiss, T., Smith, K. (1998). The ISE Policy Statement - the Innovation Policy Implications of the Innovations Systems and European Integration', Research project. TSER programme (DG XII). Linkoping University.
EMERIPA (2006). Methodology for regional innovation strategy impact assessment and benchmarking. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki - Urban and Regional Innovation research unit (URENIO).
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2009). Making public support for innovation in the EU more effective: Lessons learned from a public consultation for action at Community level. Commission Staff Working Document. SEC(2009)1197 of 09.09.2009. European Communities. Brussels.
EVCA (2006). EVCA Yearbook 2006. EVCA, Belgium.
FRITSCH, M., Rolf, L. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30, pp. 297-312.
GROENENDIJK, N. S. (2004). The Use of Benchmarking in EU Economic and Social Policies, European Communities Studies Association (ECSA) annual meeting, University of Southern Denmark, 24-25 September 2004.
HALL, B.H. (2002). The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18(1), pp. 35-51.
HERTOG, P. den, Rubalcaba L., Segers J. (2008). Is there a rationale for services R&D and innovation policies? International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 9(3-4), pp. 334-354.
HOLLANDERS, H., Cruysen, A. van (2008). Rethinking the European Innovation Scoreboard : A revised methodology for 2008-2010. Proinno Europe. European Commission.
KAISER, R., Prange, H. (2004). Managing Diversity in a System of Multi-Level Governance: The Open Method of Co-ordination in Innovation Policy, Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), pp. 249-266.
LERNER, J., Moore D., Shepherd, S. (2005). A study of New Zealands venture capital and private equity market and implications for public policy. LECG Limited. Wellington.
LIU, X., White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context, Research Policy, 30(7), pp. 1091-1114.
EUROPEAN COUNCIL (2000). Lisbon European Council. Presidency Conclusions. European Council. Brussels.
LUNDVALL, B.A. (ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter, London.
LUNDVALL, B.A., Tomlinson, M. (2002). International Benchmarking as a Policy Learning Tool, in Rodrigues, M.J. (ed) The New Knowledge Economy in Europe: A strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 203-231.
MALERBA, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production, Research Policy, 31(2), pp. 247-264.
MERIPA (2007 ). Indicators and Benchmarking Tools Benchmarking Innovation Performance of Regions. Emilia-Romagna Region.
OECD (1995). Manual on the measurement of human resources devoted to S&T "Canberra Manual". OECD, Paris.
RONDÉ, P., Hussler, C. (2005). Innovation in regions: what does really matter? Research Policy, 34, pp. 1150-1172.
SMITH, K. (1999). Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy, in: Bryant and Wells (eds.), A New Economic Paradigm? Innovation-Based Evolutionary Systems, pp. 10-47, Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Industry, Science and Resources, Science and Technology Policy Branch, Canberra.
SMITH, K. (2000). Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), pp. 73-102.
STRINNOP (2003). Guide book STRINNOP: How to Strengthen the regional innovation profile: A Pragmatic Approach. STRINNOP Project Consortium.
TETHER, B. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31, pp. 947-967.
TOVAINEN, O., P. Niininen (2000). Investment, R&D, subsidies, and credit constraints, Department of Economics MIT and Helsinki School of Economics, Working Papers no 244.
UTTERBACK, J. M. (1996). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA.
WALLSTEN S.J. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of small business innovation research program, RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1), pp. 82-100.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).