R&D Management and the Stokes Diagram: An Exploratory Study
AbstractThe Stokes Diagram model was developed to replace the linear mode view of a progression of science by a two dimensional plane in which the vertical dimension represents the search of understanding and the horizontal dimension represents the use. Although this diagram is easy to understand, no cases of organizations or government programs were identified in literature which developed a method to put this proposal in practice. Thus, based on the development of a conceptual and operating model, both dimensions were measured and validated through structural equation modeling, using information from 28 dissertations developed in a Postgraduate program. The results suggest that the proposed method is viable and give some examples of its use to analyze and manage R&D activities.
AMAVARADI, C, S., Lee, I. (2005). The dimensions of process knowledge, Knowledge and Process Management, 12, pp. 65-76.
BALARAM, P. (2008), Science, invention and Pasteur´s quadrant, Current Science, 94, pp. 961-962. http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/ apr252008/961.pdf [Retrieved from the Web 22 May 2008]
BIGWOOD, M. P., (2004), Managing the new technology exploitation process. Research Technology Management, 47, pp. 38-42.
BRITO Cruz, C. H., (2008), Políticas para C&T&I para o Brasil. http://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~brito [Retrieved from the Web 13 Jun 2008]
CAMARA, G. (2005) Um Instituto, Três Missões, Dez Compromissos. http://www.dpi.inpe.br/gilberto/inpe/ apresentacao_ comite_busca.ppt [ Retrieved from the Web 20 Apr 2008]
CHIN, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares approach to structural equation modeling, in: Marcoulides, G. A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., USA.
DAVENPORT, T.H., Jarvenpaa, S. L., Beers, M. (1996). Improving knowledge work, Sloan Management Review, 34, pp. 53-65.
GIBBONS, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge. Sage Publications, Inc., London.
HAIR Jr., J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C., (2005). Análise Multivariada de Dados. Bookman, Porto Alegre
IPEN (2007). Relatório de Gestão, São Paulo.
JARVIS, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model mis specification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, pp. 199-218.
MILES, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: an expanded sourcebook. California Sage Publications, Inc.
OECD (2002). Manual Frascati. OECD publications service, Paris.
LANDES, D. S. (1998). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: why some are so rich and some so poor. W. Norton & Company, New York.
PRICE, R. H., Behrens, T. (2003). Working Pasteur´s quadrant: harnessing science and action for community change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, pp. 219-223.
RAJASEKAR, S., Philominathan, P., Chinnathambi, V., (2006). Research methodology, Ar XIV Physics. http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601009v2 [Retrieved from the Web 22 May 2008]
RINGLE, C. M., Wende, S., Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 M3 (beta). University of Hamburg, Germany. http://www.smartpls.de [Retrieved from the Web 04 Sep 2009]
ROOT-BERNSTEIN, R. S., (1989). Who discovers and invents. Research Technology Management, 32, pp. 43-50.
RUSH, H., Bessant, J., Hobday, M. (2007). Assessing the technological capabilities of firms: developing a policy tool. R-D Management, 37, pp. 221-236.
SÁENZ, T. W. Capote, E. C. (2002). Ciência, Inovação e Gestão Tecnológica. CNI/IEL/SENAI ABIPTI, Brasília.
STOKES, D. E. (1997). Pasteur´s Quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. The Brookings Institution, Washington.
SIM, S. K., Duffy, A. H. B. (2004). Knowledge transformers: a link between learning and creativity, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 18, pp. 271-279.
SIMMONS, P. E., Brunkhorst, H., Lunetta, V., et al. (2005). Developing a research agenda in science education, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, pp. 239-252.
TSAO, J. Y., Boyack, K. W., Coltrin, M. E., et al. (2008). Galileo´s stream: a framework for understanding knowledge production, Research Policy, 37, pp. 330-352.
TRUJILLO Ferrari, A. (1974) Metodologia da Ciência. 2 and 3rd. ed. Kennedy, Rio de Janeiro.
UN, C. A. (2007). Managing the innovators for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 2, pp. 4-20.
ZWICKER, R., Souza, C. A., Bido, D. S. (2008). Uma revisão do modelo do grau de informatização de empresas: novas propostas de estimação e modelagem usando PLS ( partial least squares ), Proceedings of the XXXII Encontro da Associação dos Programas de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, ANPAD.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).