State Promotion, Technological Capabilities, and Industrial Competitiveness: Differences Between Brazil and Argentina in The Automotive Value Chain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242025000300072Keywords:
automotive value chain, international competitiveness, technological policyAbstract
The automotive value chain has traditionally been significant in Brazil and Argentina, and encouraged by specific incentives. The aim of this research is to analyse the differences regarding promotion policies of this value chain in these two countries, focusing on those oriented towards technological capabilities and, hereafter, to see their effects in terms of production, technology, and foreign trade. The methodology will be focused on the analysis of variables relevant to the scope of study. The results show that, unlike Argentina, Brazil has incorporated incentives for the development of technological capabilities in policies aimed at the automotive value chain. This resulted in Brazil's greater innovation efforts and results in the sector, a favourable gap in terms of productivity, and greater international competitiveness of the automotive value chain. In addition, it plays a leading role in the technological development of ethanol-fuelled engines and has a greater diffusion of electric vehicles than Argentina. These divergent trajectories demonstrate the relevance of public policy to promote the development of technological capabilities.
Downloads
References
ACEA (2023). The Automobile Industry Pocket Guide 2023/2024. European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (Association des Constructeurs Européens d’Automobiles - ACEA). Retrieved May 29, 2024, from ACEA-Pocket-Guide-2023-2024.pdf
Alcorta, L. & Peres, W. (1998). Innovation systems and technological specialization in Latin America and the Caribbean. Research Policy, 26(7-8), 857-881.
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Arza, V. (2011). Mercosur as an export platform for the automotive industry. CEPAL Review, (103), 129-152.
Baruj, G., Dulcich, F., Porta, F. & Ubogui, M. (2021). La transición hacia la electromovilidad: panorama general y perspectivas para la industria argentina. (CCE Working Paper No. 5), Consejo para el Cambio Estructural, Ministerio de Desarrollo Productivo de la Nación.
Brito, T., Islam, T., Stettler, M., Mouette, D., Meade, N. & Dos Santos, E. (2019). Transitions between technological generations of alternative fuel vehicles in Brazil. Energy Policy, 134.
Cantarella, J., Katz, L. & Monzón, N. (2017). Argentina: factores que debilitan la integración de autopartes locales. In Panigo, D., Gárriz, A., Lavarello, P. and Schorr, M. (Eds.), La encrucijada del autopartismo en América Latina, UNDAV.
Castellacci, F. & Natera, J.M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579-594.
Cepeda, H., Rozemberg, R. & Hurtado, E. (2017). Convergencia regulatoria del complejo automotor del MERCOSUR para impulsar la integración. Inter-American Development Bank. Retrieved October 16, 2024, from http://170.210.48.62/escuelas/politica/ideas/documentos/Sectores%20Productivos/Complejo%20automotor.pdf
Cimoli, M., Pereima, J.B. & Porcile, G. (2019). A technology gap interpretation of growth paths in Asia and Latin America. Research Policy, 48(1), 125-136.
De Mello, A., Marx, R. & Souza, A. (2013). Exploring scenarios for the possibility of developing design and production competencies of electrical vehicles in Brazil. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 13(3), 289-314.
Dosi, G. & Nelson, R.R. (1994). An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4, 153-172.
Dosi, G., Freeman, C., & Fabiani, S. (1994). The process of economic development: introducing some stylized facts and theories on technologies, firms and institutions. Industrial and corporate change, 3(1), 1-45.
Dulcich, F. & Comito, M. (2024). Efectos en la industria automotriz argentina de la producción de vehículos duplicada con Brasil. Tempo do Mundo,(36).
Dulcich, F. (2022a). La cadena automotriz en Argentina: trayectoria reciente y perspectivas en un contexto global de reconfiguración tecnológica y geográfica (Working Paper No. 32). Plan Argentina Productiva 2030, Ministerio de Desarrollo Productivo de la Nación. Retrieved March 15, 2024, from https://www.argentina.gob.ar/sites/default/files/2021/03/32_-_cadena_automotriz_-_arg._productiva_0.pdf
Dulcich, F. (2022b). Technological development and peripheral industrialisation within the framework of global value chains: the cases of the automotive chain in the EU and Mercosur. Revista Tempo do Mundo, (29), 435-471.
Dulcich, F., Otero, D. & Canzian, A. (2020). Trayectoria y situación actual de la cadena automotriz en Argentina y Mercosur. Ciclos en la Historia, la Economía y la Sociedad, 31(54), 93-130.
Dulcich, F., Porta, F., Ubogui, M. & Baruj, G. (2022). The transition to electric mobility: opportunities for the automotive value chain in Argentina. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 22(3), 374-400.
ECLAC (2017). La Inversión Extranjera Directa en América Latina y el Caribe, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
Eufrásio, A.B.R., Daniel, J. & Delgado, O. (2023). Operational Analysis of Battery Electric Buses in São Paulo. The International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), Washington, DC.
FENABRAVE (2024). Anuário 2023: O desempenho da Distribuição Automotiva no Brasil. Federação Nacional da Distribuição de Veículos Automotores (FENABRAVE), São Paulo.
Fiuza, E.P. (2002). Automobile demand and supply in Brazil: Effects of tax rebates and trade liberalization on price-marginal cost markups in the 1990s (Discussion Paper No. 119). IPEA, Brasília.
Freeman, C. (1995). The "National System of Innovation" in historical perspective’, Cambridge Journal of Economics. 19, 5-24.
Gárriz, I. & Panigo, D. (2015). Prebisch y el principio de reciprocidad. Una aplicación para el caso de la Política Automotriz Común entre Argentina y Brasil. Ensayos Económicos, (73).
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J. & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104.
Gordinho, M.C. (2010). Do álcool ao etanol: trajetória única. Editora Terceiro Nome.
Hasan, I. & Tucci, C.L. (2010). The innovation–economic growth nexus: Global evidence. Research Policy, 39(10), 1264-1276.
Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification (Working Paper No. 1997/02). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, OECD Publishing.
Hira, A., & De Oliveira, L. G. (2009). No substitute for oil? How Brazil developed its ethanol industry. Energy policy, 37(6), 2450-2456.
IEA (2024). Global EV Outlook 2024: Moving towards increased affordability. International Energy Agency (IEA), France.
Junior, J.A.C. & Santos, L.B. (2020). Estado e indústria automobilística no Brasil: análise das políticas Inovar-Auto e Rota 2030. Revista Entre-Lugar, 11(21), 101-127.
Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A. & Stoffman, N. (2017). Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 665-712.
Kosacoff, B. & Porta, F. (1997). La inversión extranjera directa en la industria manufacturera argentina: tendencias y estrategias recientes (Working Paper No. 77). Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
Lall, S. (2000). The Technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985‐98. Oxford Development Studies, 28(3), 337–369.
Lee, E., & Mah, J. S. (2020). Industrial policy and the development of the electric vehicles industry: The case of Korea. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 15(4), 71-80.
Loschky, A. (2008). Reviewing the Nomenclature for High-Technology Trade. The Sectoral Approach (Working Paper STD/SES/WPTGS(2008)9). OECD Statistics Directorate, Paris.
Lugones, G. E., Gutti, P., & Le Clech, N. (2007). Indicadores de capacidades tecnológicas en América Latina. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), México.
Martines-Filho, J., Burnquist, H., & Vian, C. (2006). Bioenergy and the rise of sugarcane-based ethanol in Brazil. Choices, 21(2), 91-96.
Marx, R., Mello, A.M.D. & Lara, F.F.D. (2020). The new geography of the automobile industry: trends and challenges in Brazil. In Covarrubias V., A. and Ramírez Perez, S.M. (Eds.), New Frontiers of the Automobile Industry (pp. 349–375), Palgrave Macmillan.
Mazzucato, M. (2011). The Entrepreneurial State. Demos, London.
MCTI (2013). Relatório anual da utilização dos incentivos fiscais. Ano base 2012. Capitulo III da Lei do Bem - Lei Nº 11.196/05. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (MCTI), Brasília.
MCTI (2023). O que é a Lei do Bem. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (MCTI). Retrieved September 27, 2024, from https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/lei-do-bem/paginas/o-que-e-a-lei-do-bem
MDIC (2020). Rota 2030 - Mobilidade e Logística. Ministério do Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio Exterior (MDIC). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.gov.br/mdic/pt-br/assuntos/competitividade-industrial/setor-automotivo/rota-2030-mobilidade-e-logistica
Miller, R. (1994). Global R & D networks and large-scale innovations: The case of the automobile industry. Research Policy, 23(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90025-6.
MINCyT (2019). Encuesta I+D del sector empresario: Informe 2018. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (MINCyT).
MINCyT (2021). Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Argentina 2019. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (MINCyT).
Morero, H. (2013). El proceso de internacionalización de la trama automotriz argentina. H-Industri@, 7(12), 1–36.
Muniz, S.T.G. & Belzowski, B.M. (2017). Platforms to enhance electric vehicles' competitiveness. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 17(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJATM.2017.084806.
Neffa, J. (2017). Modos de desarrollo, trabajo y empleo en la Argentina, 2002-2017. Revista Estado y Políticas Públicas, (9), 93–119.
Nelson, R.R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297–306.
OECD (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. OECD publishing, Paris.
OICA (2015). World Motor Vehicle Production by Country and Type 2013-2014. OICA Correspondents Survey. Heavy Trucks, International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers. Retrieved September 12, 2024, from https://www.oica.net/wp-content/uploads//HCV-2014-Aug.15.pdf
OICA (2016). World Motor Vehicle Production by Country and Type 2014-2015. OICA Correspondents Survey. Heavy Buses, International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers. Retrieved October 07, 2024, from https://www.oica.net/wp-content/uploads/Buses-2015-Q4-March-16.pdf
Pavlínek, P. (2012). The internationalization of corporate R&D and the automotive industry R&D of East-Central Europe. Economic Geography, 88(3), 279–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01155.x
Pavlínek, P. (2020). Restructuring and internationalization of the European automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 20(2), 509–541. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby070.
Perez Almansi, B. (2023). La excepcionalidad del caso Toyota en la trayectoria reciente de la industria automotriz argentina (2002-2019). H-industria, (32), 129–156.
Pinazo, G., Dinerstein, N. & Córdoba, F. (2017). Un aporte a la discusión sobre la productividad laboral en la Industria Argentina. Cuadernos de Economía Crítica, 3(6), 101–125.
PROMOB-e (2018). Avaliação Internacional de Políticas Públicas para Eletromobilidade em Frotas Urbanas. Projeto Sistemas de Propulsão Eficiente (PROMOB-e), Ministério da Indústria, Comércio Exterior e Serviços (MDIC).
Quadros, R. & Consoni, F. (2009). Innovation capabilities in the Brazilian automobile industry: a study of vehicle assemblers' technological strategies and policy recommendations. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 2(1–2), 53–75.
Quadros, R. & Queiroz, S. (2001). The implications of globalisation for the distribution of design competences in the auto industry in Mercosur. Proceedings of Gerpisa, 32, 35–44.
Ramos, J. & Sunkel, O. (1993). Toward a Neostructuralist Synthesis. In Sunkel, O. (Ed.), Development From Within: Toward a Neostructuralist Approach for Latin America (pp. 5–20), Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, USA.
Saravanan, A., Pugazhendhi, A. & Mathimani, T. (2020). A comprehensive assessment of biofuel policies in the BRICS nations: Implementation, blending target and gaps. Fuel, 272.
Schvarzer, J. (1995). La reconversión de la industria automotriz argentina: un balance a mitad de camino. Ciclos en la Historia, la Economía y la Sociedad, 5(8), 5–27.
Sierra, P. & Katz, F. (2002). La industria automotriz de cara a su futuro. Escenarios, LITTEC, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.
Sturgeon, T., Lima Chagas, L. & Barnes, J. (2017). Inovar Auto: Evaluating Brazil's Automotive Industrial Policy to Meet the Challenges of Global Value Chains. World Bank. Retrieved June 26, 2024, from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/100851511798447023/pdf/121667-REVISED-Brazil-Public-Expenditure-Review-Brazil-in-Automotive-Globa.pdf
Sturgeon, T., Memedovic, O., Van Biesebroeck, J. & Gereffi, G. (2009). Globalisation of the automotive industry: main features and trends. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 2(1–2), 7–24.
Toyota (2018). Toyota Reveals World-First Flexible Fuel Hybrid Prototype in Brazil. Retrieved September 11, 2024, from https://global.toyota/en/newsroom/corporate/21633112.html
Tromboni de Souza Nascimento, P., Sin Oih Yu, A., Quinello, R., S Macri Russo, R. D. F., Nigro, F., & Lima, N. C. (2009). Exogenous factors in the development of flexible fuel cars as a local dominant technology. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 4(4), 110-119.
Tsukada, O., Telles-Pascoal, E., Delamaro, C., Muzio-Candido, G. & Ibusuki, U. (2017). La nueva Política Automotriz Brasilera y su impacto en la estrategia de las Terminales y Autopartistas multinacionales. In Panigo, D.T. et al. (Eds.), La encrucijada del autopartismo en América Latina, UNDAV, Avellaneda.
Viotti, E.B. (2002). National learning systems: a new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(7), 653–680.
Vispo, A. (1999). Reservas de mercado, cuasi rentas de privilegio y deficiencias regulatorias: el régimen automotriz argentino. In Azpiazu, D. et al. (Eds.), La desregulación de los mercados. Paradigmas e inequidades de las políticas del neoliberalismo, Ed. Norma.
Yu, A., De Souza Nascimento, P., Nigro, F., Frederick, B., Junior, W. & De Mello, K. (2009). Supplier involvement in flex-fuel technology development: The General Motors and Volkswagen Brazilian cases. In PICMET'09-2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (pp. 1616–1625), IEEE.
Yu, A., De Souza Nascimento, P., Nigro, F., Frederick, B., Varandas, A., Vieira, S. & Rocha, R. (2010). The evolution of flex-fuel technology in Brazil: the Bosch case. In PICMET 2010 Technology Management for Global Economic Growth (pp. 1–11), IEEE.
Zilbovicius, M., Marx, R. & Salerno, M.S. (2002). A comprehensive study of the transformation of the Brazilian automotive industry. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 2(1), 10–23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Technology Management and Innovation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
