New Product Opportunity Identification: A Perspective from Inside the Intuitive Phenomenon
Keywords:opportunity identification, opportunity recognition, opportunity creation, front end of innovation, new product development process
Innovating comprises generating offers that make the preexisting ones obsolete. It implies in the creation or recognition of new forms of differentiation, the Opportunities Identification (OI). These may be due, among others, to new solutions or new problems to be solved, the latter a less explored path in the Product Development Process. There are studies aimed at systematizing OI, but present a discreet behavior in front of intuitive approaches. These rely on individual talent, a non-unanimous resource. As innovation is time-sensitive, there is room for artificial stimuli to intuition, which relies on the need for a close understanding of the phenomenon. This paper presents the descriptive research outcomes from a broader prescriptive study, which adopted the Design Research Methodology structure. Because OI is primarily a cognitive process and difficult to observe by a third party, one of the researchers submitted himself to the experience and recording of the phenomenon. The experience constitutes a unique case of OI accompanied during 2590 days. During this time, the study recorded 137 potential opportunities (units of analysis) by serendipity. Through the interpretation of the experienced phenomenon, the results comprise three perspectives: i/to the interaction of influence factors pointed out in the literature; ii/to the opportunities emergence; and, iii/to the opportunities identification. It is evident the challenge of considering opportunities as problems by its tendency of incubation. The work presents new research questions, hypotheses, and explanations valid to the case that potentially stimulate new exploratory or confirmatory researches or both.
Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., Mcbride, R., & Wuebker, R. (2017). On opportunities: philosophical and empirical implications. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 726-730.
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105-123.
Baron, R. A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 328–340.
Baron, R. A., & Shane, S. A. (2007). Empreendedorismo: uma visão do processo. [Entrepreneurship: a view of the process]. São Paulo: Thomson Learning.
Berglund, H., & Korsgaard, S. (2017). Opportunities, time, and mechanisms in entrepreneurship: on the practical irrelevance of propensities. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 730-733.
Bernal, I. M. (2018, November 05). O que é (exatamente) a inteligência emocional? [What is (exactly) emotional intelligence?]. El País. Retrieved November 10, 2018, from https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2018/10/24/ciencia/1540372846_255478.html
Blessing, L. T. M., Chakrabarti, A., & Wallace, K. (1992). Some issues in engineering design research. In: N. Cross (Ed.), OU/SERC Design Methods Workshop, The Open University, Milton Keynes.
Blessing, L. T. M., Chakrabarti, A., & Wallace, K. (1995). A design research methodology. In: V. Hubka (Ed.), International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’95) (pp. 502–507). Heurista, Zürich, Prague.
Blessing, L. T. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, a design research methodology. London: Springer.
Butler, J. E. (Ed.) (2004) Opportunity identification and entrepreneurial behavior. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Cardon, M. S., Foo, M. D., Shepherd, D., & Wiklund, J. (2012). Exploring the heart: Entrepreneurial emotion is a hot topic. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 1-10.
Cooper, R. G. (2001) Winning at new products: accelerating the process from idea to launch (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Cooper, R. G. (2017) Winning at new products: accelerating the process from idea to launch (5th ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Cooper, R. G., & Edgett, S. J. (2007). Generating breakthrough new product ideas: feeding the innovation funnel. [S.l.], Canada: Product Development Institute.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. [Research project: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods]. (3rd ed.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Davidsson P. (2017a). Entrepreneurial opportunities as propensities: Do Ramoglou & Tsang move the field forward? Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 82-85.
Davidsson P. (2017b). Reflections on misgivings about “dismantling” the opportunity construct. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 65-67.
Davidsson P. (2017c). Opportunities, propensities, and misgivings: some closing comments. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, 123-124.
De Jong, J. P. J., & Marsili, O. (2015). The distribution of Schumpeterian and Kirznerian opportunities. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 19–35.
Fiet, J. O. (2007). A prescriptive analysis of search and discovery. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), 592–611.
Fiet, J. O., Clouse, V. G. H. & Norton Junior, W. I. (2004). Systematic search by repeat entrepreneurs. In: J. E. Butler (Ed.), Opportunity identification and entrepreneurial behavior (pp. 1-27). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Fineman, S. (1993). Organizations as emotional arenas. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Foo, M. D. (2011). Emotions and entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(2), 375-393.
Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2017). Entrepreneurial discovery or creation? in search of the middle ground. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 733-736.
George, N. M., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2), 309-350.
Gil, A. C. (2009). Estudo de caso. [Case study]. São Paulo: Atlas.
Gil, A. C. (2016). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. [How to design research projects]. (5th ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
Goleman, D. (2001) Inteligência emocional: a teoria revolucionária que redefine o que é ser inteligente. [Emotional intelligence: the revolutionary theory that redefines what it is to be intelligent]. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva.
Grichnik, D., Smeja, A., & Welpe, I. (2010). The importance of being emotional: how do emotions affect entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation and exploitation? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76(1), 15-29.
Hansen, D. J., Monlor, J., & Shrader, R. C. (2016). Identifying the elements of entrepreneurial opportunity constructs: Recognizing what scholars are really examining. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 17(4), 240–255.
Hayton, J. C., & Cholakova, M. (2012). The role of affect in the creation and intentional pursuit of entrepreneurial ideas. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 41-68.
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3),551-575.
Hoornaert, S., Ballings, M., Malthouse, E. C., & Van Den Poel, D. (2017). Identifying new product ideas: waiting for the wisdom of the crowd or screening ideas in real time. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 580-597.
Johnston, N. (n.d.). Chi-square distribution. Retrieved April 22, 2020, from http://www.statdistributions.com/chisquare?chi=94.7&df=7
Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2007). As 10 faces da inovação: estratégias para turbinar a criatividade. [The ten faces of innovation: Ideo's strategies for beating the devil's advocate & driving creativity throughout your organization]. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Khalid, S., & Sekiguchi, T. (2018). The role of empathy in entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: An experimental study in Japan and Pakistan. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 9, 1-9.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2015). Blue ocean strategy: how to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant (Expanded ed.). Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2017). Blue ocean shift. New York: Hachette Book.
Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kitching, J., & Rouse, J. (2017). Opportunity or dead end? Rethinking the study of entrepreneurial action without a concept of opportunity. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(5), 558–577.
Ko, S. (2004). Bisociation and opportunity. In: J. E. Butler (Ed.), Opportunity identification and entrepreneurial behavior (pp. 99-114). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Koen, P. A., Ajamian, G. M., Boyce, S., Clamen, A., Fisher, E., Fountoulakis, S., Johnson, A., Puri, P., & Seibert, R. (2002). Fuzzy front end: effective methods, tools, and techniques. In: P. Belliveau, A. Griffin, & S. Somermeyer, (Eds.), The PDMA toolbook 1 for new product development (pp. 5-35). New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc..
Koçoğlua, İ, Imamoğlub, S. Z., Akgünc, A. E., İnced, H.; & Keskin, H. (2015). Exploring the unseen: a collective emotional framework in entrepreneurial orientation and business model innovation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207(20), 729-738.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Lichtenstein, B. B. (2005). The role of organizational learning in the opportunity recognition process. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(4), 451–472.
Magnusson, P. R., Wästlund, E., & Netz, J. (2016). Exploring users’ appropriateness as a proxy for experts when screening new product/service ideas. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 4-18.
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional intelligence new ability or eclectic traits? American Psychologist, 63(6), 503–517.
Michl, T., Welpe, I. M., Spörrle, M., & Picot, A. (2017). The role of emotions and cognitions in entrepreneurial decision-making. In: M. Brännback, & A. Carsrud (Eds.), Revisiting the entrepreneurial mind: Inside the black box: An expanded edition (International studies in entrepreneurship book 35) (pp. 219-242). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Oriarewo, G. O., Agbin, K. C., & Zever, T. A. (2014). Relationship between emotional intelligence and entrepreneurial performance: the mediating effect of managerial competence. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(10), 1-16.
Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245-256.
Ramoglou, S., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2016). A realist perspective of entrepreneurship: opportunities as propensities. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 410-434.
Ramoglou, S., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2017a). In defense of common sense in entrepreneurship theory: beyond philosophical extremities and linguistic abuses. Academy of Management Revie, 42(4), 736-744.
Ramoglou, S., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2017b). Accepting the unknowables of entrepreneurship and overcoming philosophical obstacles to scientific progress. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, 71-77.
Ramoglou, S., & Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2015). The constructivist view of entrepreneurial opportunities: a critical analysis. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 71-78.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 185–211.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.
Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
Soukhoroukova, A., Spann, M., & Skiera, B. (2012). Sourcing, filtering, and evaluating new product ideas: an empirical exploration of the performance of idea markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 100-112.
Stull, C., Myers, P., & Scott, D. M. (2008). Tuned in: uncover the extraordinary opportunities that lead to business breakthroughs. New Jersey: John Wiley& Sons, Inc..
Treffers, T., Welpe, I. M., Spörrle, M., & Picot, A. O. (2017). The role of emotions and cognitions in the pre-entrepreneurial process: What’s New? In: M. Brännback, & A. Carsrud (Eds.), Revisiting the entrepreneurial mind: Inside the black box: An expanded edition (International studies in entrepreneurship book 35) (pp. 243-259). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Urban, G. L., & Hauser, J. R. (1993). Design and marketing of new products. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Vaghely, I., & Julien, P. (2010). Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73-86.
Welpe, I. M., Spörrle, M., Grichnik, D., Michl, T., & Audretsch, D. B. (2012). Emotions and opportunities: the interplay of opportunity evaluation, fear, joy, and anger as antecedent of entrepreneurial exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 69-96.
WIPO (2020). International patent classification. Retrieved April 22, 2020, from https://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/ipcpub/?notion=scheme&version=20200101&symbol=none&menulang=en&lang=en&viewmode=f&fipcpc=no&showdeleted=yes&indexes=no&headings=yes¬es=yes&direction=o2n&initial=A&cwid=none&tree=no&searchmode=smart
Wood, M. S. (2017a). Misgivings about dismantling the opportunity construct. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 21-25.
Wood, M. S. (2017b). Continued misgivings: a response to Davidsson on dismantling the opportunity construct. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 77-81.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Josmael Roberto Kampa, Carlos Cziulik, Paulo André de Camargo Beltrão
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).