The Role of Reflection in Facilitating and Assessing Innovativeness
AbstractThe aim of the research is to study the features that should be taken into account when facilitating innovations through reflection, and focusing on the impacts of reflection on innovation. A single case study approach was used in the study. The data was gathered with semi-structured interviews and also innovation measurement data were gathered from the company. To achieve an overall view of the studied organization with regard to the research questions, representatives from different organizational levels were interviewed. In total, six interviews were conducted, including the director, two managers and three employees. The studies of different innovation measurement and management have mainly been theoretical considerations. Further, the role of reflection in facilitating innovation in organizations has been neglected in current literature. The current study presents the features of reflective procedure of facilitating and assessing innovations. The results can be utilized by managers working with innovation management.
BOURNE, M., Kennerley, M., Franco-Santos, M. (2005). Managing trough measures: A study of impact on performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(4), 373-395.
CARAYANNIS, E.G., Provance, M. (2008). Measuring firm innovativeness: Towards a composite innovation index built on firm innovative posture, propensity and performance attributes. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(1), 90-107.
DAVILA, T., Epstein, M.J., Shelton, R. (2006). Making Innovation Work: How to Manage It, Measure It, and Profit from It, Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
DOBNI, C.B. (2008). Measuring innovation culture in organizations: The development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539-559.
FAIRBANK, J.F., Spangler, W.E., Williams, S.D. (2003). Motivating creativity through a computer-mediated employee suggestion management system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(5), 305-314.
FAIRBANK, J.F., Williams, S.D. (2001). Motivating creativity and enhancing innovation through employee suggestion system technology. Creativity and Innovation Management, 10(2), 68-74.
FORSMAN, H., Rantanen, H. (2011). Small manufacturing and service enterprises as innovators: a comparison by size. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 27-50.
HILDÉN, S., Tikkamäki, K., Suomala, P. (2012). Reflection for renewal. OCD – Organizational Change and Development Conference, September 13-14, 2012, Switzerland.
HØYRUP, S. (2004). Reflection as a core process in organisational learning, Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 442-454.
HULT, G.T.M., Hurley, R.F., Knight, G.A. (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429-438.
JOHNSTON, R., Brignall, S., Fitzgerald, L. (2002). ‘Good enough’ performance measurement: A trade-off between activity and action. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(3), 256-262.
KAPLAN, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard. Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
LAWSON, B., Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3), 377-400.
LEACH, J., Stride, C.B., Wood, S.J. (2006). The effectiveness of idea capture schemes. International Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3), 325-350.
LEE, L.T-S. (2008). The effects of team reflexivity and innovativeness on new product development performance, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(4), 548-569.
LIN, R-J., Chen, R-H., Chiu, K.K-S. (2010). Customer relationship management and innovation capability: An empirical study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(1), 111-133.
LINGLE, J.H., Schiemann, W.A. (1996). From balanced scorecard to strategic gauges: Is measurement worth it?. Management Review, 85(3), 56-62.
MANN, K., Gordon, J., MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(4), 595-621.
MULLER, A., Välikangas, L., Merlyn, P. (2005). Metrics for innovation: Guidelines for developing a customized suite of innovation metrics. Strategy & Leadership, 33(1), 37-45.
NAHAPIET, J., Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
NAKAMURA, Y.T., Yorks, L. (2011). The Role of Reflective Practices in Building Social Capital in Organizations From an HRD Perspective, Human Resource Development Review, 10(3), 222-245.
OLLILA, S. (2000). Creativity and Innovativeness through Reflective Project Leadership, Creativity and Innovation Management, 9(3), 195-200.
REYNOLDS, M. (2011). Reflective practice: origins and interpretations, Action Learning: Research and Practice, 8(1), 5-13.
SIMONS, R. (2000). Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing Strategy, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
SKARZYNSKI, P., Gibson, R. (2008). Innovation to the Core: A Blueprint for Transforming the Way Your Company Innovates, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
SOMECH, A. (2006). The Effects of Leadership Style and Team Process on Performance and Innovation in Functionally Heterogeneous Teams, Journal of Management, (32)1, 132-157.
SUBRAMANIAN, A., Nilakanta, S. (1996). Organizational innovativeness: Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. International Journal of Management Science, 24(6), 631-647.
TIDD, J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex.
UKKO, J., Tenhunen, J., Rantanen, H. (2008). The impacts of performance measurement on the quality of working life. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 10(1), 86-98.
WANG, C.L., Ahmed, P.K. (2003). Structure and structural dimensions for knowledge-based organizations. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(1), 51-62.
YIN, R. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd edition, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).