A Conceptual Model of Technology Transfer for Public Universities in Mexico

Authors

  • Hugo Necoechea Instituto Politécnico Nacional
  • Daniel Pineda-Domínguez Profesor –Investigador de la E.S.C.A. Santo Tomás del Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Carpio 471, Col. Plutarco Elías Calles. CP. 11340, Ciudad de México.
  • Rocío Soto-Flores Profesor –Investigador de la E.S.C.A. Santo Tomás del Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Carpio 471, Col. Plutarco Elías Calles. CP. 11340, Ciudad de México.

Keywords:

technology transfer, universities, researchers, networks, models, transferee, transferor

Abstract

Technology transfer from academic and scientific institutions has been transformed into a strategic variable for companies and nations who wish to cope with the challenges of a global economy. Since the early 1970s, many technology transfer models have tried to introduce key factors in the process. Previous studies have shown that technology transfer is influenced by various elements. This study is based on a review of two recent technology transfer models that we have used as basic concepts for developing our own conceptual model. Researcher–firm networks have been considered as key elements in the technology transfer process between public universities and firms. The conceptual model proposed could be useful to improve the efficiency of existing technology transfer mechanisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hugo Necoechea, Instituto Politécnico Nacional

Coordinación de Operación de Redes de Investigación, Edificio Secretaria Académica, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Avenida Miguel Othón de Mendizábal s/n, 07738 México City, DF, México.

e-mail hnecoecheam@ipn.mx Phone : 52 55 57296000 ext. 50651.

References

AUDRETSCH, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Wright, M. (2012). Technology transfer in a global economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-12, doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9283-6.

BARCENA, A. (2010). Espacios iberoamericanos: vínculos entre universidades y empresas para el desarrollo tecnológico: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL) / Secretaría General Iberoamericana.

BEKKERS, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837-1853, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007.

BREZNITZ, S. M., & Feldman, M. P. (2012). The larger role of the university in economic development: introduction to the special issue. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(2), 135-138, doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9184-5.

CABRERO, E., Cárdenas, S., Arellano, D., & Ramírez, E. (2011). La vinculación entre la universidad y la industria en México. Una revisión a los hallazgos de la Encuesta Nacional de Vinculación. Perfiles Educativos, 33, 86-199.

CASALET, M., & Casas, R. (1998). Un diagnóstico sobre la vinculación universidad-empresa, CONACYT-ANUIES: Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior, Dirección de Servicios Editoriales y Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología.

COHENDET, P., & Meyer-Krahmer, F. (2005). Technology Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy. In P. Llerena, & M. Matt (Eds.), Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy (pp. 75-112): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

CONACYT-SIICYT (2011). Informe de Labores. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología.

CHOI, H. J. (2009). Technology Transfer Issues and a New Technology Transfer Model. The Journal of Technology Studies, 35, 49-57.

ECKL, V. C. (2012). Creating an Interactive-Recursive Model of Knowledge Transfer. CBS, Copenhagen, Denmark,

FERIA, V., & Hidalgo, A. Towards a transfer model of scientific and technological knowledge: The case of Mexico. In, 2011 (pp. 1-19): International Association for Management of Technology

GOLDSTEIN, H. A., & Glaser, K. (2012). Research universities as actors in the governance of local and regional development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(2), 158-174, doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9193-4.

GONZALEZ-BRAMBILA, C., & Veloso, F. M. (2007). The determinants of research output and impact: A study of Mexican researchers. Research Policy, 36(7), 1035-1051, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.005.

HEINZL, J., Kor, A. L., Orange, G., & Kaufmann, H. (2012). Technology transfer model for Austrian higher education institutions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-34, doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9258-7.

HEISEY, P., & Adelman, S. (2011). Research expenditures, technology transfer activity, and university licensing revenue. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 38-60, doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9129-z.

JAROHNOVICH, N., & Avotiņš, V. (2009). Assessment of technology transfer and difussion models in Latvia. Journal of Business Management, 31-41.

KHABIRI, N., Rast, S., & Senin, A. A. (2012). Identifying Main Influential Elements in Technology Transfer Process: A Conceptual Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40(0), 417-423, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.209.

KRÜCKEN, G., Meier, F., & Müller, A. (2007). Information, cooperation, and the blurring of boundaries – technology transfer in German and American discourses. Higher Education, 53(6), 675-696, doi:10.1007/s10734-004-7650-4.

LAMBOOY, J. (2004). The transmission of knowledge, emerging networks, and the role of universities: An evolutionary approach. European Planning Studies, 12(5), 643-657, doi:10.1080/0965431042000219996.

LIPINSKI, J., Minutolo, M. C., & Crothers, L. M. (2008). The Complex Relationship Driving Technology Transfer: The Potential Opportunities Missed by Universities. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management, 112-133.

PRATO, G., & Nepelski, D. (2012). Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-18, doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9285-4.

ROLFO, S., & Finardi, U. (2012). University Third mission in Italy: organization, faculty attitude and academic specialization. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-15, doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9284-5.

SAZALI, A. W., Haslinda, A., Jegak, U., & Raduan, C. R. (2009). Evolution and development of technology transfer models and the influence of knowledge-based view and organizational learning on technology transfer. Research Journal of Internatıonal Studıes(12), 79-91.

SIEGEL, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2003). Symposium Overview: Economic and Managerial Implications of University Technology Transfer (Selected Papers on University Technology Transfer from the Applied Econometrics Association Conference on “Innovations and Intellectual Property: Economic and Managerial Perspectives”). The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 5-8, doi:10.1023/A:1021620817749.

SIEGEL, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2.

SIEGEL, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2), 115-142, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006.

SINGH, A., & Aggarwal, G. (2010). Technology Transfer Introduction, Facts and Models. International Journal Of Pharma World Research, 1(2), 1-8.

SWAMIDASS, P. M., & Vulasa, V. (2009). Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 343-363, doi:10.1007/s10961-008-9097-8.

TRIFAN, E.-L., Guică, R.-I., & Micu, C.-A. (2012). Innovation management and technology transfer within a model of innovation center at the University Politechnica of Bucharest. Problems of management in the 21st century, 4, 75-85.

VILLA, R. E. (2002). LA INVESTIGACIÓN Y EL POSGRADO EN LA ESTRATEGIA GENERAL PARA LA IMPLANTACIÓN DEL NUEVO MODELO EDUCATIVO y DEL MODELO DE INTEGRACIÓN SOCIAL (Vol. 18). Mexico City: IPN.

WAHAB, S. A., Rose, R. C., Uli, J., & Abdullah, H. (2009). A Review on the Technology Transfer Models, Knowledge-Based and Organizational Learning Models on Technology Transfer. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(4).

WALSH, S. T., & Kirchhoff, B. A. (2002). Technology transfer from government labs to entrepreneurs. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 10(02), 133-149, doi:10.1142/S0218495802000177.

WARREN, A., Hanke, R., & Trotzer, D. (2008). Models for university technology transfer: resolving conflicts between mission and methods and the dependency on geographic location. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(2), 219-232, doi:10.1093/cjres/rsm009.

WU, W., & Zhou, Y. (2012). The third mission stalled? Universities in China’s technological progress. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(6), 812-827, doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9233-8.

Published

2013-12-05

How to Cite

Necoechea, H., Pineda-Domínguez, D., & Soto-Flores, R. (2013). A Conceptual Model of Technology Transfer for Public Universities in Mexico. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(4), 24-35. Retrieved from https://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/1388

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2013)

Section

Research Articles

 Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Most read articles by the same author(s)