Online Social Networks and the New Organizational Spaces
Keywords:metaphors, social networks, organizational space, organizational strategy.
We analyzed the ‘virtuality’ of the social space and the boundaries of organizations from the emergence and dissemination of online social networking. The purpose is to identify how the use of social networks by 10 Brazilian companies enables the redefinition and expansion of organizational space. For the analysis of the data, we used the theory of social space of Lefebvre (2004), which defines three moments of space social production: the imagined space, the lived space and the perceived space. The methodological qualitative approach is done by document analysis from the websites of the companies. We show that the organizational space has new contours with the adoption of online social networks and we analyzed four spatial metaphors: the square, the museum, the temple and the market.
BOULOS, M.N.K., Wheeler, S. (2007). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24 (1), 2-23.
BROCKLEHURST, M. (2001). Power, Identity and New Technology Homework: Implications for 'New Forms' of Organizing. Organization Studies, 22 (3), 445-466.
BUGHIN, J., Manyika, J. (2007). How businesses are using Web 2.0: A McKinsey global survey. The McKinsey Quarterly. Available at: http://www.skmf.net/fileadmin/redaktion/aktiver_content/01_Events/080514_SWISS_KM_Tool_Tag/Track_0_Other_Material/0005_How_firms_use_Web20.pdf
CAPRIGLIONE, L. (2011). Carência afetiva 2.0. Redes sociais exacerbam fenômeno conhecido como medo de estar perdendo algo; carentes profissionais confessam síndrome. Jornal Folha de S. Paulo, Cadernotec, F1, 18 May.
CASTELLS, M. (2007). A Sociedade em Rede. Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra.
COBO ROMANÍ, C., Pardo Kuklinski, H. (2007). Planeta Web 2.0. Inteligência colectiva o medios fast food. Grup de Recerca d'Interaccions Digitals, Universitat de Vic. Flacso México. Barcelona/México DF. http://docencia.izt.uam.mx/sgpe/files/users/virtuami/file/ext/misueas_colabo_wiki_actv_aprendizajecolabo.pdf
CORNACHIONE, D. (2010). As empresas querem entrar. Revista Época, Especial Redes Sociais, 628, 92-94, 31 May.
DEMETRIO, A. (2011). Estrelas afagam ego de usuários do Twitter. Jornal Folha de S. Paulo, Cadernotec, F6, 18 May.
DENNISON, R. (2006). Using wikis for collaboration and KM at BT. KM Review. 9(5), 1.
DIJCK, J.V., Nieborg, D. (2009). Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business. New Media & Society, 11(5), 855-876.
FAYOL, H. (1990). Administração Industrial e Geral. Previsão, organização, comando, organização e controle. São Paulo, Atlas.
GIDDENS, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Oxford, Polity Press.
GRANJEIA, J. (2011). Pressão faz Arezzo barrar venda de pele. Jornal Folha de S. Paulo, Caderno Mercado, 19 Apr.
GROSSMAN, M. Mccarthy, R.V. (2007). WEB 2.0: is the enterprise ready for the adventure? Issues in Information Systems, VIII, 2, 180-186. http://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=management_fac
HALFORD, S., Leonard, P. (2005). Place, Space and Time: Contextualizing workplace subjectivities. Organization Studies, 27(5), 657-676.
HATCH, M.J. (1999). Exploring the Empty Spaces of Organizing: How Improvisational Jazz Helps Redescribe Organizational Structure. Organization Studies, 20 (1), 75-100.
HINCHCLIFFE. (2006). The State of Web 2.0. Web Services Journal, 4 April 4. http://web2.wsj2.com/the_state_of_web_20.htm
HOF, R. (2006). Web 2.0 has corporate America spinning. Business Week Online, 5 Jul.
JFSP (2011a). Jornal Folha de S. Paulo. Angústia vem da dificuldade de escolher. Cadernotec, F6, 18 May.
JFSP (2011b). Jornal Folha de S. Paulo. Mundo digital. Notas da semana. Cadernotec, 18 May.
JFSP (2011c). Jornal Folha de S. Paulo. Após pressão na internet, Arezzo barra venda de pele. Caderno Mercado, B4, 19 Apr.
LEE, S., Hwang, T. Lee, H. (2006). Corporate blogging strategies of the Fortune 500 companies. Management Decision, 44(3), 316-334.
McAFEE, A. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47 (3), 21–28.
McAFEE, A., Brynjolfsson, E. (2008). Investing in the IT that makes a competitive difference. Harward Business Review, Jul-Aug, 1-12.
MONTE, F. (2010). O chefe quer ser seu amigo. Revista Época, Especial Redes Sociais, 628, 88-89, 31 May.
MURUGESAN, S. (2007). Understanding Web 2.0. IEEE Computer Society. http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/MITP.2007.78
O’REILLY, T. (2005). Web 2.0: Compact Definition? http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/10/web_20_compact_definition.html
STARBUCK, W. (2007). Living in Mithical Spaces. Organization Studies, 28 (1), 21-25.
TAYLOR, F. W. (1990). Princípios de Administração Científica. São Paulo, Atlas.
YOUNG, G.O. (2007). Efficiency Gains and Competitive Pressures Drive Enterprise Web 2.0 Adoption. http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/excerpt/0,7211,41794,00.html
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).