Blind Technology Transfer or Technological Knowledge Leakage: a Case Study from the South
Abstract
Blurring boundaries between science and technology is a new phenomenon especially in fields such as biotechnology. The present work shows the fate of biotech research papers on foreign patents produced during the last decade in Quilmes National University. It aims at recognizing the flow of scientific knowledge developed at a public university towards foreign companies and organizations as well as reflecting on its technological value, the role of technology transfer management, the institutional significance of technology transfer processes and the need to develop innovative public policies for solving structural failures caused by industrial underdevelopmentDownloads
Metrics
References
BELL, D. (1973 [2006]). El advenimiento de la sociedad post-industrial (Alianza Editorial)
CALLAERT, J., VAN LOOY, B, VERBEEK, A., DEBACKERE, K Y THIJS, B. (2006) “Traces of prior art: an analysis of nonpatent references found in patent documents” en Scientometrics,Vol. 69, Nro 1 (2006) págs. 3 a 20.
CASTELLS M. (1996). “La red y el yo” en La Era de la Información: Economía, sociedad y cultura (Edición de Hipersociología)
CHESBROUGH, H (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
CODNER D. (2011) “Capítulo IV. Alcances, resultados e impacto del FONCYT entre 2006 y 2010” en Porta, F. y G. Lugones (directores), Investigación científica e innovación tecnológica en Argentina. Impacto de los fondos de la Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, Bernal, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2011, pp. 133-181.ISBN edición impresa 978-987-558-234-7. ISBN libro electrónico 978-987-558-238-5.
CODNER D. y DÍAZ A. (2009) “Biotecnología en Argentina: innovación tecnológica y sociedad. Producción y uso de conocimientos”.Yale University. Law School. Information Society Project. Access to Knowledge Program. http://yaleisp.org/publications/a2kresearch/
DAVID P. y FORAY D. (2002). “Una introducción a la economía y a la sociedad del saber”. Revista Internacional de las Ciencias Sociales. Número 171. 7-28
DE SOUZA QUERIDO A et al (2011) “What is the Destiny of Patents of Brazilian Univesities?” J. Techno.Manag.Innov. Vol 6, Issue I.
DRUCKER, P. (1969).The Age of Discontinuity Guidelines to Our Changing Society. New York: Harper & Row.
FREEMAN, C. (1982). “Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness”, draft paper submitted to the OECD ad hoc group on science, technology and competitiveness, Paris: OCDE;
FREEMAN, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance - lessons from Japan. London: Frances Pinter.
GANGULI, P., BLACKMAN, M.J.R., (1995). “Patent documents: a multiedge tool.” World Patent Information 17 _4., 245–256.
GIBBONS M, et al. (1997) “La nueva producción del conocimiento” Ed. Pomares-Corredor
GOLDSTEIN, D. (1987) “Biotecnología, Universidad y Política” . Siglo XXI Ed., págs.. 199 – 200.
HETZKOWITZ, H. y LEYDESDORFF, L., Eds (1997). “Universities in the Global Economy:A Triple Helix of University- Industry- Government Relations”, London: Casell Academic.
KATZ J. (1975)“Patentes, corporaciones multinacionales y tecnologías.Un examen crítico de la legislación internacion- al”, cap. 12.. En J. Sábato (ed.) El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia – tecnología-desarrollo – dependencia. Ed. Paidós, BsAs;
KLINE S. y ROSENBERG N. (1986) “An overview of innovation.” In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, pp. 275–305.
KRAUSKOPF M.et al. (2007) “Link between science and innovation affects public policies in developing countries: The Chilean case”. Scientometrics,Vol. 72, No. 1 93–103
LANJOUW J. O., et al (1998), How to count patents and value intellectual property: the uses of patent renewal and application data, Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(4), 405-432.
LUGONES G, et al (2011). “Investigación científica e innovación tecnológica en Argentina : impacto de los fondos de la por Fernando Porta y Gustavo Lugones. - 1a Ed. - Bernal: Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. ISBN: 978-987-558-234-7
LUNDVALL, B.-Å. (1985). Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
MARQUES, R and GONÇALVES NETO, C (2007) “The Brazilian system of innovation in biotechnology: a preliminary study” J.Tech Man Innov., vol 2; issue 1; pag. 55 - 63
MARTÍNEZ VIDAL. C.(2002) La Escuela Latinoamericana de Pensamiento en Ciencia,Tecnología y Desarrollonotas de un Proyecto de Investigación. CTS+I: Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad e Innovación, ISSN 1681-5645, Nº. 4, 5 – 30.
MEYER, M. (2000). “Does Science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature” en Research Policy nro. 29, págs. 409-434.
MIROWSKI, P. (2011).“Science – Mart . Privatizing American Science” – Harvard University Pres – 2011;
NARIN, F. y NOMA, E. (1985) “Is technology becoming Science?” en Scientometrics,Vol. 7, Nros 3-6, págs 369-381.
NARIN, F., HAMILTON, K., y OLIVASTRO, D. (1997), “The increasing linkage between US technology and public science”, en Research Policy, 26 (3) : 317–330.
NELSON, R. (1995). Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change. Journal of Economic Literature,Volumen 23, Marzo 1995, pp.48-90.
NELSON, R. Y S. WINTER. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press.
NELSON, R., ed. (1993). National Systems of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
PERKO J. S. y NARIN F. “The Transfer of Public Science to Patented Technology: A Case Study in Agricultural Science” Journal of Technology Transfer Vol. 22 (3) 65-72, 1997
PISANO, G. (2006) “Science Business”, Harvard Business School Press.
RULLANI, E. (2004). ¨El capitalismo cognitivo ¿un déjà-vu?,¨ en O. Blondeau, et al., Capitalismo cognitivo, propiedad intelectual y creación colectiva (Madrid:Traficantes de sueños) http://sindominio.net/traficantes/editorial/capitalismocognitivo.htm consultado noviembre de 2011
SÁBATO, J.Y BOTANA, N.(1970) “La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo de América Latina”, en Herrera Amílcar y otros. América Latina: Ciencia y Tecnología en el desarrollo de la sociedad, Colección Tiempo latinoamericano, Editorial Universitaria SA, Santiago de Chile, 1970, pp.59-76.
SCHMAL R. et al (2010) Modelado de Procesos de Negocio para la Gestión de Patentes en Universidades). Información Tecnológica Vol. 21(6), 113-124
TEUBAL, M. (1996). R&D and Technology Policy at NICs as Learning Processes.World
VEGA-JURADO,J; FERNÁNDEZ DE LUCIO, I and HUANCA-LOPEZ, R. (2007) “¿La relación universidad - empresa en América Latina: apropiación incorrecta de modelos foráneos?” ; J.Techno.Manag.Innov.Vol 2, issue I, pag 97 - 109
ZAWISLAK, P.A. and G. DALMARCO. 2011.“The Silent Run: New Issues and Outcomes for University-Industry Relations in Brazil”. J.Techno.Manag.Innov.Vol 6, Issue II.
ZUKERFELD, M. (2010). Capitalismo y conocimiento. Materialismo cognitivo, propiedad intelectual y capitalismo informacional. –Tesis de Doctorado, FLACSO.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
