Motivation Strategies for Knowledge Workers: Evidences and Challenges
Keywords:Job satisfaction, Engineering, Motivation, Reward, Skilled workers, R & D
AbstractMany studies have been performed previously to investigate different theories of motivation and, more specifically, how to motivate technical professionals. Through a questionnaire survey carried out on 376 development engineers, identified as “knowledge workers” by managers in their firms, this study identifies what methods are used in industry to motivate these individuals, what works and what does not. While many aspects of standard incentives and reward systems used to motivate technical professionals in general are also motivating for technical visionaries, these results indicate that they are motivated by additional factors not generally discussed in the literature.
GARWAL, N. and Singh, P. (1998). Organizational rewards for a changing workplace: An examination of theory and practice. Int. J. Technol. Manage., 16( 1-3), p.225-238.
ALLEN, T. J. (1988). Distinguishing engineers from scientists. Managing Professionals in Innovative Organizations: A Collection of Readings, R. Katz, Ed. New York.
ALLEN,T. J. and Katz, R. (1989). Managing engineers and scientists: Some new perspectives. Human Resource Management in International Firms, P. Evans,Y. Dos, and A. Laurent, Eds. London, U.K.: Macmillan.
ALLEN, T. J. and Katz, R. (1990). The treble ladder revisited:Why do engineers lose interest in the dual ladder as they grow older?. Proc. 1st Int. Forum Technol. Manage., p.409426.
ALLEN, T. J. and Katz, R.(1986). The dual ladder: motivational solution or managerial delusion?. R & D Management, 16(2), p. 185-97.
ALLEN, T. J. and Katz, R. (1992). Age, education and technical ladder. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39(3),p.237-45.
ALLEN, T. J. and Katz, R. (1995). The project-oriented engineer: a dilemma for human resource management. R & D Management, 25(2), p. 129-40.
ARDICHVILI, A, Cardozo, R. and Ray, S. ( 2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. J. Bus. Ventur., 18, p. 105- 123.
BAILYN, L. (1991). The hybrid career: an exploratory study of career routes in R & D. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 8(1), p. 1-14.
BRUNNER, G. F. (2001). The IRI medalist's address:The Tao of innovation. Res.Technol. Manage., 44 (1), p.45-51.
CANAINN, A.O. (1995). Herr Ingenieur or the grease monkey? How the managerial prospects of engineers are perceived. Human Resource Management Journal, 5(4),p.74-92.
CHEN, C, Ford, C. and Farris, G. (1999). Do rewards benefit the organization? The effects of reward types and the perceptions of diverse R & D professionals. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 46(1), p.47-55.
DEBACKERE, K, Buyens, D. and Vandenbossche J. (1997). Strategic career development for R & D professionals: lessons from field research. Technovation, 17(2), p.53-62.
FARRIS, G. (1999). Patterns in high-impact innovation. The Dynamics of Innovation: Strategic and Managerial Implications, K. Brockhoff, A. Chakrabartio, and J. Hauschildt, Eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
FROHMAN,A.L (1978). Mismatch problems in managing professionals. Research Management, 21 (4), p.20-5.
GOLDBERG, A.I. and Shenav, YA. (1984). R & D career paths: their relation to work goals and productivity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 31), p. 111-17.
GRIFFIN,A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. J. Product Innov. Manage., 14(6), p.429-458.
GROENVELD, P. (1997). Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Res.Technol. Manage., 40(5), p.48-55.
GUNZ, H.P. (1980). Dual ladders in research:A paradoxical organizational fix. R & D Manage., 10(3), p. 113-118.
HALL, D.T and Louis, M. R. (1988).When careers plateau. Res. Technol. Manage., 31 (2), p.41 -45.
HALLENBURG, EX. (1970). Dual advancement ladder provides unique recognition for the scientist. Res. Manage., 13(3), p.221-227.
HESKETH, B., Gardner, D. and Lissner, D. (1992).Technical and managerial career paths: an unresolved dilemma. International Journal of Career Management, 4(3), p.9-16.
HOWARD, A. (1983). Can Engineers Succeed in General Management? Enhancing Engineering Careers by Fulfilling Individual and Organizational Goals, IEEE, New York, NY), p.76-80.
IGBARIA, M., Kassicieh, S.K. and Silver, M. (1999). Career orientations and career success among research, and development and engineering professionals. Journal of Engineering andTechnohgy Management, 16(1), p.29-54.
JOHNSON, D. and Sargeant, A. (1998). Motives for transition: an exploratory study of engineering managers. Human Resource Management Journal, 8(3), p.41-53.
KERR, J. and Slocum J.W. (1987). Managing corporate culture through reward system. Acad. Manage. Exec, 1(2), p.99108.
KOCHANSKI, J., Mastropolo, P. and Ledford, G. (2003). People solutions for R & D. Res.Technol. Manage., 46(1), p.59-61,.
KONING J.W. (1993).Three other R's: Recognition, reward and resentment. Res.Technol. Manage., 36(4), p. 19-29.
LEIFER, R., McDermott, C. M., O'Connor, G. C, Peters, L S., Rice, M., and Veryzer, R.W. (2000). Radical Innovation: How Mature Compontes Can Outsmart Upstarts. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
LENTZ,W. (1990). Dual ladders become multiple ladders at Dow Corning. Res.Technol. Manage., 33(3), p.28-34.
MARKHAM, S. K. and Aiman-Smith, L (2001). Product champions: Truths, myths and management. Res. Technol. Manage., 44(3), p.44-50.
MARKHAM, S. K. and Kingon,A. I. (2004).Turning technical advantage into product advantage. In The PDMA ToolBook 2 for New Product Development, R Belliveau, A. Griffin, and S. M. Somermeyer, Eds. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, ch. 3.
MCCORMICK,K. (1995). Career paths, technological obsolescence and skill formation: R & D staff in Britain and Japan. R & D Management, 25(2), p. 197-211.
MILLER, DB. (1986). Managing Professionals in Research and Development. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
MUNSON J.M. and Posner, B.Z.( 1979).The values of engineers and managing engineers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 26(4), p.94-100.
NICHOLSON, G. C. (1998). Keeping innovation alive. Res.Technol. Manage., 41 (3), p.3440.
O'CONNOR, G., Hyland J. and Rice, M. R (2004). Bringing radical and other major innovations successfully to market: Bridging the transition from R & D to operations. In The PDMA ToolBook2 for New Product Development, R Belliveau, A. Griffin, and S. M. Somermeyer, Eds. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, ch. 2.
ROBERTS, K.and Biddle J. (1994).The transition into management by scientists and engineers: a misallocation or efficient use of human resources?. Human Resource Management, 33(4), p.561-79.
SALEH, S. D and Desaio, K. 1986. Occupational stressors for engineers. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., EM-33(1),p.6-11.
SHLAES, A. (1991). Rewarding and stimulating creativity and innovation in technical companies. In Proc. IEEE Conf. Technol. Manage.: New Int. Language, 27(31), p.609-612. Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 1989.
STAUDT, E., Bock J. Muhlemeyer, R and Kriegesmann, B. (1991). Incentive systems as an instrument of company innovation management: Results of an empirical investigation in the R & D sector. Int. J. Technol. Manage., 6(3-4), p.395-413.
TAMPOE, M. (1993). Motivating knowledge workers ± the challenge for the I990s. Long Range Planning, 26(3), p.49-55.
VOJAK, B.A., Gr¡ffin,A. Price, R. L. and Perlov K. 2006. Characteristics of technical visionaries as perceived by American and British industrial physicists. R & D Manage., 36(1), p. 17-26.
WOLFF,W. E. (1987). Revisiting the dual ladder at General Milis. Res.Technol. Manage., 30(3), p.8-12.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).