Analysing Changes in Electricity Industries Against Actors and Technologies: Utility to Business Transformations in Denmark, Germany, Finland and Spain
Keywords:Change, social construction, electricity industry, wind energy, solar photovoltaic
AbstractLiberalization of electricity markets, governmental policies for renewable electricity and technology development are transforming national electricity industries. However, there are considerable national differences in how these industries have changed and which businesses have been developed. We propose a typology for comparing changes in electricity industry based on the changes in the actors and technologies. Wind power and solar photovoltaic are used here as technology examples. A qualitative analysis of the changes in electricity industries in four EU member states is presented. Based on the preliminary findings, we conclude that if the industry consists of many, small firms with relatively loose ties with the government the industry is more likely to change than if it consists of few large firms with strong relations with the government.
ANDERSON, P. & Tushman, M. (1990). Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, n. 4, pp. 604-633.
ÁLVAREZ-FARIZO, B., & Hanley, N. (2002). Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain. Energy Policy, vol. 30, n. 2, pp. 107-116.
BECKMAN,W., Lundtang Petersen, E., & Sellberg, B. (1992). NEMO: Advanced energy systems and technologies: Evaluation of the research programme 1988-1990. Helsinki: Ministry of Trade and Industry.
BIRKINSHAW, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, vol. 33, n. 4, pp. 825-845.
BLOK, K. (2006). Renewable energy policies in the European Union. Energy Policy, vol. 34, n. 3, pp. 251-255.
CALLON, M. (1980). Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not. The sociologic of translation. In K. Knorr, R. Krohn & R.Whitley (Eds.),The social process of scientific investigation, sociology of sciences (pp. 197-219). Dordrecht: Reidel.
CAMPOCCIA, A., Dusonchet, L., Telaretti, E., & Zizzo, G. (2009). Comparative analysis of different supporting measures for the production of electrical energy by solar PV and wind systems: Four representative European cases. Solar Energy, vol. 83, n. 3, pp. 287-297.
CHHOKAR, J., Brodbeck, F., & House, R. (2007). Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in- depth studies of 25 societies. London: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
DOSI, G. 1982, Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change, Research Policy, vol. 11, n. 3, pp. 147-162.
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. (2007). A European strategic energy technology plan (SET- plan): Capacities map. No. SEC(2007) 1511). http://ec.europa.eu/energy/technology/set_plan/doc/2007_capacity_map.pdf (Accessed June 10, 2011)
COWAN, R. (1990). Nuclear power reactors. A study in technological lockin. The Journal of Economic History, vol. 50, n. 3, pp. 541-567.
DANMARK STATISTIK (2010), www.dst.dk, wind energy statistics, accessed, September 12, 2010
DANMARKS VINDMÖLLEFÖRENING, 2009, www.dkvind.dk/eng/faq/cooperatives.pdf. (Accessed August 1, 2010)
DEL RÍO GONZÁLEZ, P. (2008). Ten years of renewable electricity policies in Spain: An analysis of successive feed-in tariff reforms. Energy Policy, vol. 36, n. 8, pp. 2917-2929.
DEL RÍO, P., & Unruh, G. (2007). Overcoming the lock-out of renewable energy technologies in Spain: The cases of wind and solar electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 11, n. 7, pp. 1498-1513.
DEUTSCH, K. (2008). Cap and trade in America: US climate policy at a crossroads. http://www.banking-on-green.com/docs/cap_trade_america.pdf: Deutsche Bank. (Accessed Oc- tober 11, 2010)
DOMANICO, F. (2007). Concentration in the European electricity industry: The internal market as solution? Energy Policy, vol. 35, n. 10, pp. 5064-5076.
DRESNER, S., Dunne, L., Clinch, P., & Beuermann, C. (2006). Social and political responses to ecological tax reform in Europe: An introduction to the special issue. Energy Policy, vol. 34, n. 8, pp. 895-904.
EIKELAND, P. O. (1993). US energy policy at a crossroads? Energy Policy, vol. 21, n. 10, pp. 987-999.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2007). DG competition report on energy sector inquiry No. SEC(2006) 1724) http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/energy/inquiry/full_report_part2.pdf. (Accessed June 10, 2011)
EUROPEAN UNION. (2007). Energy, Retrieved 01/2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/
EUROSTAT (2010). Energy statistics, renewable energy, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu, (Accessed May 3, 2010)
THE FEDERAL MINISTRY OF ECONOMICS AND TECHNOLOGY, Germany, (2010). Energy policy, http://www.bmwi.de (Accessed June 10, 2011)
THE FEDERAL ENVIRONMENT AGENCY, Germany, (2010). Renewable energy strategy http://www.umweltbundesamt.de (Accessed June 10, 2011)
GRANOVETTER, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 91, n. 3, pp. 481-510.
GRANOVETTER, M. & McGuire, P. (1998).The Making of an Industry: Electricity in the United States: pp. 147-173. In The Laws of The Markets, ed. M. Callon, Blackwell, Oxford.
GRANOVETTER, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, n. 1, pp. 33-50.
GREEN, R. 2007, EU Regulation and Competition Policy among the Energy Utilities, 50 years of the Treaty, ftp://ftp.bham.ac.uk/pub/RePEc/pdf/08-01.pdf. (Accessed June 10, 2011)
HENDERSON, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, pp. 9-30.
HIRSCH-KREINSEN, H. (2009).“Low technology”: A forgotten sector in innovation policy. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 11-20.
HOFFMANN,V., & Trautmann,T. (2006).The role of industry and uncertainty in regulatory pressure and environmental strategy. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings,
IIDA, T., Kanie, N., Maruyama, Y., Nishikido, M., & Hondo, H. (2006). Renewable energy and social innovation in Japan http://www.isep.or.jp/library/060218swisspresen.pdf: Institute for Sustainable Energy Policies. (Accessed April 7, 2010)
JACOBSSON, S., & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation-explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy, vol. 34, n. 3, pp. 256-276.
JACOBSSON, S., & Bergek,A. (2004).Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 13, n. 5, pp. 815-849.
JAMISON, A., Eyerman, R., Cramer, J., & Laessoe, J. (1990). The making of new environmental consciousness:A comparative study of environmental movements in Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands. Oxford:The Alden Press Limited.
JOHNSTONEA, N., Hascica, I., Clavelb, L., & Maricalb, F. (2008). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Empirical evidence based on patent counts. NBER Working Paper No. W13760. http://www.grenoble.inra.fr/Site/Conf_2007/Papers/Hascic.pdf: National Bureau of Economic Research. (Accessed April 7, 2010)
KLAASSEN, G., Miketa, A., Larsen, K., & Sundqvist, T. (2005). The impact of R & D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics, vol. 54, n. 2-3, pp. 227-240.
KLIMAOG ENERGIMINISTERIET, (2010). Energy policy in Denmark, http://www.kemin.dk/ (Accessed June 10, 2011)
KOBOS, P. H., Erickson, J. D., & Drennen,T. E. (2006).Technological learning and renewable energy costs: Implications for US renewable energy policy. Energy Policy, vol. 34, n. 13, pp. 1645-1658.
KOJO, M., & Litmanen, T. (Eds.). (2009). The renewal of nuclear power in Finland. Eastbourne: Palmgrave Macmillan.
KÜNNEKE, R.W. (2008). Institutional reform and technological practice:The case of electricity. Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 17, n. 2, pp. 233-265.
LEWIS, J., & Wiser, R. (2007). Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: An international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms. Energy Policy, vol. 35, n. 3, pp. 1844-1857.
LILJA, K., Räsänen, K., & Tainio, R. (1992). A dominant business recipe: The forest sector in Finland. In R. Whitley (Ed.), European business systems: Firms and market in their national contexts (pp. 137-154). London: Sage.
LITMANEN, T. (2001). The struggle over risk. the spatial, temporal and cultural dimensions of protest against nuclear technology. University of Jyväskylä .
LUND, P. (2009). Effects of energy policies on industry expansion in renewable energy. Renewable Energy, vol. 34, n. 1, pp. 53-64.
LYHNE IBSEN, C., & Skovgaard Poulsen, L. (2007). Path dependence and independent utility regulation: The case of Danish energy and telecommunications regulation. Scandinavian Economic History Review, vol. 55, n. 1, pp. 41-63.
MARKARD, J., & Truffer, B. (2006). Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change? Research Policy, vol. 35, n. 5, pp. 609-625.
MEYER, N. (2007). Learning from wind energy policy in the EU: Lessons from Denmark, Sweden and Spain. European Environment, vol. 17, n. 5, pp. 347-362.
MINISTRY OF EMPLOYMENT AND THE ECONOMY, Finland (2010), Energy and Climate policy (in Finnish). www.tem.fi (Accessed June 10, 2011)
MINISTRY OF TOURISM, INDUSTRY AND TRADE, Spain (2010), Energy policy, http://www.mityc.es/ (Accessed June 10, 2011)
MOL, A. (1995). The refinement of production. ecological modernization theory and the chemicals industry (Doctoral dissertation ed.). Utrecht:Van Arkel.
MONTIEL CAMPOS, H., del Palacio Aguirre, I., Solé Parellada, F. & Nuño de la Parra, José Pablo (2009). Technology Strategy and New Technology Based Firms. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 42-52.
MURMANN, J.P. & Frenken, K. (2006). Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Research Policy, vol. 35, n. 7, pp. 925-952.
MÜLLER-ROMMEL, F., & Poguntke, T. (2002). Green parties in national governments. Chippenhamn: Frank Cass.
NEUMAYER, E. (2003).Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries. Ecological Economics, vol. 45, n. 2, pp. 203-220.
NEWELL, P. (2000). Climate for change: Non-state actors and the global politics of the greenhouse. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
O’NEILL, M. (1997). Green parties and political change in contemporary Europe. New policies, old predicaments. Gateshead: Ashgate Publishing Company.
PEHLE, H. (1997). Germany: Domestic obstacles for an international forerunner. In M. Skou Andersen, & D. Liefferink (Eds.), European environmental policy: The pioneers (pp. 161-219). Manchester: Manchester University press.
PESONEN, S. (1997). Aurinkoteknologian käyttöönoton sietämätön hitaus toimijaverkostoteoreettisesta näkökulmasta tarkasteltuna. (Unpublished Licentiate thesis, in Finnish). Helsinki, Helsinki School of Economics. (B-165)
PINEAU, P., & Hämäläinen, R. (2000). A perspective on the restructuring of the Finnish electricity market. Energy Policy, vol. 28, n. 3, pp. 181-192.
ROGERS, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
RÜDIG, W. (2002). Germany. In F. Müller-Rommel, & T. Poguntke (Eds.), Green parties in national governments (pp. 78-111). Chippenhamn: Frank Cass.
SCHEIN, E. (1985). Organisational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
SKOU ANDERSEN, M. (1997). Denmark: The shadow of a green majority. In M. Skou Andersen, & D. Liefferink (Eds.), European environmental policy: The pioneers (pp. 251-286). Manchester: Manchester University press.
STATISTISCHES BUNDESAMT DEUTSCHLAND (2010), energy statistics, http://www.destatis.de, (Accessed June 10, 2011)
STENZEL, T., & Frenzel, A. (2008). Regulating technological change-The strategic reactions of utility companies to- wards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets. Energy Policy, vol. 36, n. 7, pp. 2645-2657.
STORBACKA, K., Ryals, L., Davies, I. & Nenonen, S. (2009). The changing role of sales: viewing sales as a strategic, cross- functional process. European Journal of Marketing, vol. 43, no. 7/8, pp. 890-906.
THOMAS, S. (2003). The seven brothers. Energy Policy, vol. 31, n. 5, pp. 393-403.
VARHO, V., & Tapio, P. (2005). Wind power in Finland up to the year 2025-‘soft’ scenarios based on expert views. Energy Policy, vol. 33, n. 15, pp. 1930-1947.
VEHMAS, J. (2002). ‘Rahat ruotsiin ja päästöt tanskaan’: Suomen ympäristöperusteisen energiaverotuksen rekonstituutio (in Finnish) Tampere: University of Tampere.
VICENTE, J. & Manjón, G. 2010.A Proposal of Indicators and Policy Framework for Innovation. Benchmark in Europe, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 13-23.
VOGEL, S. (2001).The crisis of German and Japanese capitalism. Stalled on the road to the liberal market model. Comparative Political Studies, vol. 34, n. 10, pp. 1103-1133.
VOGEL, S. (1996). Freer markets, more rules, regulatory reforms in advanced industrial countries. Ithica: Cornell University Press.
WEDEL, J. (2009). Shadow elite: How the world’s new power brokers undermine democracy, government, and the free market. New York: Basic books.
WHITLEY, R. (2000).The institutional structuring of innovation strategies: Business systems, firm types and patterns of technical change in different market economics. Organization Studies, vol. 21, n. 5, pp. 855-886.
WHITTINGTON, R. (1993). What is strategy and does it matter? Guildford and King’s Lynn: Routledge.
WRIGHT, S. (1998).The politicization of ‘culture’. Anthropology Today, vol. 14, n. 1, pp. 7-15.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).