E-Mentoring: An Innovative Twist to Traditional Mentoring
AbstractMany organizations have established and implemented traditional mentoring programs. Both qualitative and quantitative research studies have found that successful mentoring programs enhance productivity, job satisfaction and may ultimately lead to protégé advancement. Traditional methods of mentoring are created through the means of one on one relationships established between the mentor and the protégé. E-mentoring through the use of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication is a new means for establishing mentor protégé relationships by creating virtual teams. This paper seeks to compare and contrast traditional mentoring with e-mentoring and propose new innovative ways to use e-mentoring in an organizational setting.
ADAMS, G., Crews, B. T. (2004). Telementoring: A viable tool. Journal of Applied Research for Business Instruction, 2(3), 1-5.
AKIN, L., Hilbun, J. (2007). E-mentoring in three voices. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(1), 1. Retrieved from Education Research Complete database.
BAUGH, G. S., Scandura, T. A. (1999). The effective of multiple mentors on protégé attitudes toward the working setting. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 14, 503-522.
BENNETT, D., Tsikalas, K., Meade, T., Honey, M. (1998). The benefits of online mentoring for high school girls: Telementoring young women in science, engineering, and computing project, Year 3 evaluation. New York: The Center for Children and Technology.
BIEREMA, L. L., Merriam, S. B. (2002). E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 211-227.
BUTTERWORTH, C., Henderson, J., Minshell, C. (2008). Increase your status with mentoring. Occupational Health, 60(11), 37.
CARRAHER, M., Sullivan, E., Crocitto, M. (2008). Mentoring across global boundaries: an empirical examination of home and host country mentors on expatriate career outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8), 1310-1326.
CHAO, G.T., Walz, P.M., Gardner, P.D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with non-mentored counter parts. Personal Psychology, 45, 619-636.
COLKY, D. L., Young, W. H. (2006). Mentoring in the virtual organization: Keys to building successful schools and businesses. Mentoring & Tutoring, 14(4), 433-447.
CUNNINGHAM, J.B. (1993). Facilitating a mentorship programme. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 14(4), 15.
ETZIONI, A. (1993). The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown Publishers.
GIBB, C. (1999). Someone to look up to. Journal of Accountancy, 188(5), 89-93.
GORDON, A.L. (2001). Cybercentrism: The new, virtual management. Management Decision, 39(8), 676-686
HAMILTON, A. B., Scandura, A. T. (2002). Implications for organizational learning and development in a wired world. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 388-402.
HARRIS, L. A., Rea, A. (2009). Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: A growing impact on IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 137-145.
HEADLAM-WELLS, J. (2004). Mentoring for aspiring women managers. Gender in Management, 19(4), 212-218.
HEADLAM-WELLS, J., Gosland, J., Craig, J. (2005). There’s magic in the web: E-mentoring for women’s career development. Career Development International, 10(6), 449-459
HEADLAM-WELLS, J., Gosland, J., Craig, J. (2006), Encounters in social cyberyspace: E-mentoring for professional women. Women in Management Review, 21(6), 483-499.
JONES, C. (1996). Careers in project networks: The case of the film industry. The boundaryless career. 58-75.
KRUGER, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., Ng, Z. (2005). Egocentrism over e-mail: Can we communicate as well as think? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 925-936.
KYONG-JEE, K., Bonk, C. J., Zeng, T. (2005). Surveying the future of workplace e-learning: The rise of blending, interactivity, and authentic learning. Elearn Magazine, 2005(6), 2.
LA MORETE, C. (2001). Bandwidth: How wide is yours? Poptronics, 2001(2), 17-18.
MARCILLE, K. (2009). Using Web 2.0 concepts for iLeadership: Technology. Financial Executive, (2), 62.
MURRELL, A. J., Blake-Beard, S., Porter, D. M., Perkins- Williamson, A. (2008). Interorganizational formal mentoring: Breaking the concrete ceiling sometimes requires support from the outside. Human Resource Management, 47(2), 275-294.
NEMIRO, E. J. (2004). Creativity in virtual teams. Business Book Review Library, 21(37), 1-10.
OSMAN, E.M. (2005). Students’ reaction to WebCT: implications for designing on-line learning environments. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(4), 353-362.
PURCELL, K. (2004). Making e-mentoring more effective. American Journal of Health-Systems and Pharmacy, 61, 284-286.
RIENZO, T., Han, B. (2009). Microsoft or Google Web 2.0 Tools for course management. Journal of Management Learning and Education. 6(1). 84-101.
SEIBERT, S. (1999). The effectiveness of facilitated mentoring: A longitudinal quasi-experiment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 483-502.
SINGLE, P.B., Muller, C. B. (2001). When email and mentoring unite: The implementation of a nationwide electronic mentoring program. In L. K. Stromei (Ed.). Creating Mentoring and Coaching Programs. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training Development.
SINGLE, P.B., Single, R.M. (2005). E-mentoring for social equality: Review of research to inform program development. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 13(2), 301-320.
TAHERIAN, K., Shekarchian, M. (2008). Mentoring for doctors. Do its benefits outweigh its disadvantages? Medical Teacher, 30(4), e95-e99. Retrieved from E-Journals database.
TESONE, D. V., Ricca, P. (2005). E-mentoring for professional growth. Journal of Applied Hospitality Management, 7(1), 196-203.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).