Knowledge Management and Analysis of Scientific Biotechnology Trends in Venezuela

  • Maria Fatima Ebole Santana Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
  • Rosalba Gómez Martínez Universidad Experimental Francisco de Miranda (UNEFM)
  • Nei Pereira Jr. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
  • Adelaide Maria Souza Antunes Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). National IInstitute of Industrial Property (INPI)
Keywords: Biotechnology, Knowledge Management, Technological Networks, Scientific Capabilities, Venezuela

Abstract

This paper presents a study on knowledge management and analysis of scientific Biotechnology trends in Venezuela, providing an overview of the science profile as well as regional development and its relation to issues of topics covered by Biotechnology based on the analysis of scientific publications for the period of 1995 to 2010. The survey was accomplished in database ISI/Web of Science using 60 terms selected by experts in Biotechnology and 803 register has been organized. Scientific indicators were produced using data/ text mining tools. It was possible to find a greater number of scientific publications in areas such as Ecology and Health, showing a greater frequency in these terms: DNA, PCR and Biodiversity. Results pointed out The United States of America as the main foreign partner-country of scientific publications followed by Spain and France. It was possible to verify cooperation network with others Latin American countries: Brazil, Colombia and Chile.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Maria Fatima Ebole Santana, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)

Bioprocess Development Laboratories (Ladebio). Biochemistry and Bioprocess Department. School of Chemistry.

Nei Pereira Jr., Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)

Bioprocess Development Laboratories. Biochemistry and Bioprocess Department. School of Chemistry.

Adelaide Maria Souza Antunes, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). National IInstitute of Industrial Property (INPI)
Information System on the Chemical Industry (SIQUIM). Organic Chemistry Department. School of Chemistry.

References

ANTUNES, A.M.S.; Canongia, C.; Bahrut, E.; Rodrigues, H.T.; Pio, M.; Gianinne, R. (2008). Prospección tecnológica - gestión del conocimiento y Inteligencia Competitiva: Modelos de Gestión para la Toma de Decisiones y Construcción de Futuro. In: Sinergía entre la Prospectiva Tecnológica y la vigilancia Tecnológica Y Inteligencia Competitiva, Bogotá, Colciencias, pp. 49-83.

BAKER, S; Aston, A. (2005). The Business of Nanotech. Business Week. 14 February, pp. 64.

BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY ORGANIZATION (2007). Bio Editor´s and Reports´Guide to Biotechnology. 2007. http://www.bio.org. (Accessed: January 10, 2010)

BIOTECH GUID APUD ERNEST & YOUNG LLP BIOWORLD, (2007). Bio Editor´s and Reports´Guide to Bio- technology. http://www.bio.org. (Accessed: April 5, 2007).

BURRILL, G.S. (2000). Biotech 90: Into the Next Decade. Biotechnology Industry Organization. International Food Information Council. Ernst & Young, WC. http://www.bio.org. (Accessed: April 5, 2007)

CANONGIA, C; Pereira, M.N.F.; Mendes, C.U.S., Antu- nes, A.M.S. (2004). Mapeamento de Inteligência Competitiva (IC) e de Gestão do Conhecimento (GC) no Setor Saúde. R. Eletr. Bibliotecon. Ci. Inf., Florianópolis, n. esp., 1º sem. 2004. pp. 78 – 95.

CONVENÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE (Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre o Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento -Rio-92). (1992). Revista Estudos Avançados. 6 (15): pp. 193-223. http://www.usp.br/iea/revista.html. (Accessed March, 4, 2004)

COMITÊ NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGIA (2008). Áreas Setoriais: Saúde Humana. Ministério da Indústria e Comércio Exterior (MDIC), Brasília, pp. 1-5.

ERNEST & YOUNG LLP (2010). Beyond Borders Global Biotechnology Report 2010, WC, pp. 1-116.

FREEMAN, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Perfomance. Lessons from Japan, London and NY, Pinter Publisher, pp 155.

GASSEN, H. (2000). Biotecnologia para Países em Des- envolvimento. Biotecnologia em Discussão. Cadernos Adenauer, No. 8, pp. 9-18.

KRATTIGER, A.F. (2002). Public-private Partnerships for Efficient Proprietary Biotech Management and Transfer, and Increase Private Sector Investments. A Briefing Paper with Six Proposals. IP Strategy Today, No. 4, Cornell University, USA, pp 42.

LEY ORGANICA DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA E INNOVACIÓN (2001). República de Venezuela. Publicada em Gaceta Oficial N. 37.291. September, 26, 2001.

MASCARENHAS, P. (2001). Parque Nacional de Empresas de Biotecnologia, Fundação Biominas, pp 1- 250.

MINISTÉRIO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO, INDÚSTRIA E COMÉRCIO EXTERIOR (2003). Diretrizes de política industrial, tecnológica e de comércio exterior. Brasília.

SANTANA, M.F.E.; ANTUNES, A.M.S.; PEREIRA Jr.,N. (2006). O Perfil da Biotecnologia no Brasil. In. Gestão em Biotecnologia, Rio de Janeiro, Editora E-papers, pp 17-42.

TORRES, O.D.; Velho, L. (2009). Capacidades Científicas y Tecnológicas de Colombia para adelantar Prácticas de Bioprospección. Revista CTS, No 12, Vol. 4. pp 55 – 68.

Published
2012-03-02
How to Cite
Santana, M. F. E., Martínez, R. G., Pereira Jr., N., & Antunes, A. M. S. (2012). Knowledge Management and Analysis of Scientific Biotechnology Trends in Venezuela. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(1), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000100010
Section
Research Articles