The Co-evolution of Business Incubators and National Incubator Networks in Emerging Markets
AbstractThe study proposes a three stage model of the development of business incubation practices in emerging markets. The model addresses the diffusion of incubation practices to new markets, the institutionalization of those practices and the co-evolution of incubators and national networks of incubation. The model is based on interviews conducted in Bolivia, Peru, Chile, Argentina, and Brazil. New incubators in emerging markets often face strong cultural norms and institutional impediments to helping entrepreneurs start new businesses. As incubation becomes better established in a country, incubators provide more advanced technical, legal and market-based advice. Networks of incubators form to share specialized services across many incubators, to allocate government funding to incubators, and to lobby for public and private support of innovation.
BORDENAVE, J. (1976) Communication of Agricultural Innovations in Latin America. Communication Research, 3(2), 135-154.
COHEN, W., Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
CANTWELL, J., Dunning, J., Lundan, S. (2010). An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 567-586.
DIMAGGIO, P., Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
ETZKOWITZ, H., Mello, J., Almeida, M. (2005). Towards "meta-innovation" in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 34, 411-424.
GRILICHES, Z. (1957). Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica, 25(4), 501-522.
HACKETT, S., Dilts, D. (2004). A systematic review of business incubation research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55-82.
iDISC Papers. (2003, October). Infodev/iDISC Regional workshop for business incubators in Latin America and the Carribean. Brasilia.
LEVINTHAL, D., March, J. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2, 307-333.
MARCH J. (1981) Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. In: A. Van de Ven and W. Joyce (Eds.) Perspectives on organization design and behavior, 205-244, Wiley, New York.
MINER, A., Haunschild, P. (1995). Population level learning. In L.L. Cummings, B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 115-166. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
NELSON, R. (Ed.). (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York.
NELSON, R., Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
ROBINSON, D., Miner, A. (1996). Careers change as organizations learn. In: M. Arthur, D. Rousseau (Eds.), The Boundaryless Career: a new employment principle for a new organizational era. Oxford University Press, New York.
ROGERS, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation (4th ed.). The Free Press, New York.
TEECE, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-305.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).