How Relevant and Useful is the Concept of National Systems of Innovation?
AbstractThis paper aimed to provide an analytical and theoretical discussion of the national innovation systems perspective. In doing so, first, we sketched out some of the economists’ main endeavours in theorizing about the relationship between technological development and economic progress over the past several decades. Second part of the presentation was concerned with identifying and describing the driving forces behind innovations; that was, an economic actor’s desire to gain and sustain competitive advantages. In the third part of the discussion, we presented major theoretical accounts put forward by the authors of national systems of innovation focusing on the question of which institutional elements shape the behaviours and interactions of economic actors in terms of innovative performance. Then we reflected on some of the major policy implications enshrined in the study of national innovation systems.
AFUAH, A. (2002). Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation and Profits. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York.
AMIT, R., Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in E-business. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, pp.493-520.
ARCHIBUGI, D., Howell, J. Michie, J. (eds.), (1999). Innovation System in a Global Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
ARCHIBUGI, D., Michie, J. (1995). The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol.19, pp. 121–140.
ASHEIM, B.T., Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, Vol. 34, pp. 1173-1190.
BAKER, D., Epstein, G., Pollin, R. [eds.] (1998). Globalisation and Progressive Economic Policy. Cambridge University Press, New York.
BATHOLOMEW, S. (1997). National systems of biotechnology innovation: complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.2, pp. 241-265.
BOGENRIEDER, I., Nootebook, B. (2004). Learning Groups: What Types are there? A Theoretical Analysis and an Empirical Study in a Consultancy Firm. Organization Studies, Vol. 25, 287-313.
CANTWELL, J. (1992). The theory of technological competence and its application to international production. In: McFetridge, D. (ed.). Foreign Investment, Technology and Economic Growt. University of Calgary Press, Calgary. pp. 33-67.
CARAYANIS, E.G., Alexander, J., Ioannisis, E. (2000). Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government -university -industry RandD partnerships in the US, Germany and France. Technovation, Vol.20, pp. 477- 488.
CHANG, H. (1994). The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. Macmillan Press, London.
COHEN, W., Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, pp. 128-152.
COOMBS, R. Hull, R. (1998). Knowledge management practices and path-dependency in innovation. Research Policy, Vol.27, pp. 237-253.
DHANARAJ, C., Pharke, A. (2006). Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, pp. 659-669.
DAVID, P. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Revie w, Vol.75, pp. 332-337.
DIMAGGIO, P. (1998). The new institutionalism: avenues of collaboration, Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics, Vol.154, pp.696-715.
DIMAGGIO, P., Powell, W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. I n : DiMaggio, P., Powell, W. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 63-82.
DOSI, G., Coriat, B. (1998). The institutional embeddedness of economic change: an appraisal of the evolutionary and regulationist research programmes. In : Nielsen, K. and B. Johnson (eds.), Institutions and Economic Change: New Perspectives on Markets, Firms and Technology, Edward Elgar, Aldershot. pp. 33-55.
DOSI, G., Pavitt, K., Soete, I. (1990 ). The economics of technical change and international trade. New York University Press, New York.
DOSI, G., Winter, S. (2002). Interpreting economic change: Evolution, structures and games. In: Augier, M. and J. March (eds.), The Economics of Choice, Change, and Organizations. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham. pp. 337-353.
EDQUIST, C. (ed.), (1997). Systems of Innovation. Pinter, London.
FREEMAN, C. (1995). The national systems of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 5-24.
GRANT, R. (1996). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, (Winter Special Issue), pp. 109-122.
GREVE, H.R. (2005). Interorganizational learning and heterogeneous social structure. Organization Studies, Vol. 26, 1025-1047.
HAUK NE S, J. ( 1999 ). Innovation Systems and Capabilities. No A1099, STEP Working paper series, The STEP Group, Studies in technology, innovation and economic policy, http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:stp:workin:a1099.
HIRST, P., Thompson, G. (1999). Globalisation in Question. Polity Press, Cambridge.
HEKKERT, M.P., Suurs, R.A.A., Negro, S.O., Kuhlmann, S., Smits, R.E.H.M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 74, pp. 413-432.
HODGSON, G. (1988). The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, pp.166-192.
HOLLINGSWORTH, J. (1997). Continuities and changes in social systems of production: the case of Japan, Germany, and United States. In: Hollingsworth, J. and R. Boyer (eds.), Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
HOWELLS, J. ( 1997 ). Rethinking the market - technology relationship for innovation. Research Policy. Vol. 25, pp.1209- 12 19.
HOWELLS, J., Michie, J. [eds.] (1997). Technology, Innovation and Competitiveness. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
KOGUT, B, Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational coroporation. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 24, pp. 625-645.
KRUGMAN, P. (199 4 ). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession, Foreign Affairs, March/ April, Vol, 73, pp. 28-44.
LEONARD-BARTON, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
LIU, X., White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China's transitional context. Research Policy, Vol.30, pp. 1091-1114.
LUNDVALL, B.-Å. [ed.] (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter Publishers, London.
LUNDVALL, B.-Å. (1998). Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol.10, pp. 407-422.
METCALFE, J. (2001). Institution and Progress. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol.10, pp. 561-585.
MICHIE, J., Prendergast, R. (1997). Innovation and competitive advantage. I n : Howells, J. and J. Michie (eds.), Technology, Innovation and Competitiveness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
MULDER, P. (2005). The Economics of Technology Diffusion and Energy Efficiency. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
MULDER, T., De Groot, H. L.F., Hofkes, M. W. (2001). Economic growth and technological change: a comparison of insights from a neo-classical and an evolutionary perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 68, pp. 151-171.
NELSON, R. [ed.] (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
NELSON, R. (1995). Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.33, pp. 48-90.
NELSON, R., Sampat, B. (2001). Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, Vol.44, pp.31-54.
NELSON, R., Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
NONAKA, I. (1991). The Knowledge Creating Company. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69 (November-December), pp. 96-104.
NONAKA, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, Vol.5, pp. 14-37.
NONAKA, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
NORTH, D. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic
Perspectives, Vol.5, pp. 97-112.
OHMAE, K. (1990). The Borderless World. Harper Business, New York.
PISANO, G. (2006). Profiting from innovation and intellectual property revolution. Research Policy, Vol. 35. Pp. 1122-1130.
PORTER, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
QUINN, J. (1992). Intelligent Enterprise. Free Press, New York.
SCHUMPETER, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Boston.
SCHUMPETER, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Harper and Brothers, New York.
SHARIF, N. (2006). Emergence and development of the national innovation systems concept. Research Policy, Vol.35, pp. 745-766.
TEECE, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation. Research Policy, Vol.15, pp. 285–306.
WESTERFILED, R.E. (ed.), (2004). Current Issues in Globalization. Nova Science Publishers, Inc, New York.
WU, J., Pangarkar, N. (2006). Rising to the global challenge: Strategies for firms in emerging markets. Long Range Planning, Vol.39, pp. 295-313.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).