Spinning Out of Control? How Academic Spinoff Formation Overlooks Medical Device Regulations
AbstractThis paper investigates the impact of the medical device regulatory framework on the academic spinoﬀ formation process and contributes to knowledge in the domain by expanding and deepening our understanding of its underlying routines and capabilities. A detailed case study focusing on academic spinoff formation in the Irish medical device industry was conducted and found that the consideration given to the medical device regulatory framework significantly lags behind that given to other commercialisation activities. This trend has potential to both significantly delay spinoff formation and negatively impact its potential success and survival. Findings indicate that incorporating expert regulatory knowledge earlier within the process may enhance the spinoff activities within universities, particularly funding, research and capital investment.
Abell, P., Felin, T. & Foss, N. (2008). Building micro-foundations for the routines, capabilities, and performance links. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29, 489–502.
Arbit, H. & Paller, M.S. (2006). A program to provide regulatory support for investigator-initiated clinical research. Academic Medicine, 81, 146-15
Algieri, B., Aquino, A. & Succurro, M. (2011). Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: the case of Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), pp.382–400.
Argote, L. & Ren, Y. (2012). Transactive memory systems: a micro foundation of dynamic capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), pp.1375–1382.
Audretsch, D.B. & Lehmann, E.E. (2005). Mansfield’s Missing Link: The Impact of Knowledge Spillovers on Firm Growth. Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield, 271–274.
Blind, K. (2012). The inﬂuence of regulations on innovation: A quantitative assessment for OECD countries. Research Policy, 41, 391–400.
Bower, D. J. (2003). Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm. R&D Management, 33(2), 97-106.
Bray, M.J. & Lee, J.N. (2000). University revenues from technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 385–392.
Carree, M., Malva, A. D., & Santarelli, E. (2014). The contribution of universities to growth: Empirical evidence for Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 393–414.
Chatterji, A. K. (2009). Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 189–206.
Clarysse, B., & Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: The case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55–79.
Curran, D., van Egeraat, C., & O’Gorman, C. (2011). New entrants and inherited competence: The evolution of the Irish biotech sector. Working Paper No.66, National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis.
D’este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2012). What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Research Policy, 21, 482–488.
D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2010). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339.
Fan, W. & Yan, Z. (2010). Factors aﬀecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26, 132–139.
Felin, T. & Foss, N. J. (2005). Strategic organization: a field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3, 441–55.
Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H. & Madsen, T. L. (2012). Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 1351–1374.
Fontes, M. (2005). The process of transformation of scientiﬁc and technological knowledge into economic value conducted by biotechnology spin-oﬀs. Technovation, 25, 239–347.
Franklin, S. J., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 127-141.
Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 329–341.
Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2005). Academics' organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business ideas. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), 821-845.
Harrison & Leitch, 2010; Harrison, R. T., & Leitch, C. (2010). Voodoo Institution or Entrepreneurial University? Spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK. Regional Studies, 44(November), 1241–1262.
Heirman, A., & Clarysse, B. (2007). Do intangible assets and prefounding R&D matter for innovation speed in start-ups. Journal of Product Innovation Management, (4), pp.303–315.
Henrekson, M., & Rosenberg, N. (2001). Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship: Lesson from the US and Sweden. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 207–231.
Hoang, H. & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), pp.165–187.
Iacobucci, D., Iacopini, A., Micozzi, A., & Orsini, S. (2011). Fostering entrepreneurship in academic spin-offs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12(4), 513–533.
Iacobucci, D., & Micozzi, A. (2014). How to evaluate the impact of academic spin-offs on local development: an empirical analysis of the Italian case. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-19.
Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe – The Case of Sweden and Ireland, Small Business Economics, 14(4), 299–309.
Knockaert, M., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Clarysse, B. (2011). The relationship between knowledge transfer, top management team composition, and performance: The case of science-based entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(4), 777–803.
Kvale, S. & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.
Lazear, E.P. (2004). Balanced Skills and Entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 94(2), 208–211.
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of US university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1106-1112.
Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7), 1043–1057.
Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981–993.
Louis, K. S., L. M. Jones, M. S. Anderson, D. Blumenthal & Campbell, E. G. (2001). Entrepreneurship, secrecy, and productivity: a comparison of clinical and non-clinical life sciences faculty, Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 233–245.
Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2007). From Human Capital to Social Capital: A Longitudinal Study of Technology-Based Academic Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 31(6), 909–935.
Muller, K. (2010). Academic spin-oﬀs transfer speed - analyzing the time from leaving university to venture. Research Policy, 39:189–199.
Mustar, P., Wright, M., & Clarysse, B. (2008). University spin-off firms: lessons from ten years of experience in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 35(2), 67-80.
Ndonzuau, F. N., Pirnay, F., & Surlemont, B. (2002). A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation, 22(5), 281–289.
Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 333–359.
Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Social Networks in Organizational Emergence: The University Spinout Phenomenon, Management Science, 49(12),1702–1725.
Niosi, J. (2006). Success factors in Canadian academic spin-offs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 451–457.
O’Shea et al. 2008; O’Shea, R. P., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. J. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 653-666.
Panacek, E. A. (2008). Survey based research: Performing the survey. Air Medical Journal, 27(2), 64–66.
Pérez, M. P., & Sánchez, A. M. (2003). The development of university spin-offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation, 23(10), 823-831.
Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research, Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182.
Poon, P. & Liyanage, S. (2004). Commercialisation of biotechnology in newly industrialised economies. International Journal of Biotechnology, 6(2/3), 243.
Rappert, B. & Webster, A. (1997). Regimes of ordering: the commercialization of intellectual property in industrial-academic collaborations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 9(2), 115–130.
Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: A longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39(5), 602–612.
Regnstrom, J., Koenig, F., Aronsson, B., Reimer, T., Svendsen, K., Tsigkos, S., Flamion, B., Eichler, H. G., & Vamvakas, S. (2010). Factors associated with success of market authorisation applications for pharmaceutical drugs submitted to the european medicines agency. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 66(1), 39–48.
Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., & Yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21, 253–261.
Rosa, P., & Dawson, A. (2006). Gender and the commercialization of university science: academic founders of spinout companies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18(4), 341-366.
Sanchez-Fernandez, J., Mun˜oz-Leiva, F., & Montoro-R´ıos, F. J. (2012). Improving retention rates and response quality in web-based surveys. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28, 507–514.
Sauermann, H. & Roach, M., 2012. Science PhD Career Preferences: Levels, Changes, and Advisor Encouragement L. A. Nunes Amaral, ed. PLoS ONE, 7(5), 36307.
Sharif, N. & Baark, E. (2008). Mobilizing technology transfer from university to industry, Journal of Technology Management China, 3(1), 47–65.
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640-660.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the eﬀective transfer of scientiﬁc knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115–142.
Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P. & Wright, M. (2003d). Science parks and the performance of new technology-based firms: a review of recent U.K. evidence and an agenda for future research, Small Business Economics, 20, 177–184.
Smilor, R. W., Gibson, D. V., & Dietrich, G. B. (1990). University spin-out companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 63–76.
Uctu, R., & Jafta, R. C. (2012). Academic entrepreneurship in South East Asia: an exploratory study of spin-offs in biotechnology from Hong Kong universities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 20(1), 141-154.
Van Dierdonck, R., & Debackere, K. (1988). Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian Universities, R&D Management, 18 (4) (1988), pp. 341–354.
van Egeraat, C., Curran, D., & Kerr, A. (2009). Social and spatial structures of collaboration and innovation in the knowledge economy. Deliverable 11.2 for EU FP6 OPAALS research project, National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis.
Vanaelst, I., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Moray, N., & S'Jegers, R. (2006). Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: An examination of team heterogeneity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), 249-271.
Vincett, P. S. (2010). The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy. Research Policy, 39(6), 736–747.
Vohora et al. 2004; Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175.
Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N. & Frohlich, M. (2002). Case research in operations management, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22 (2), 195 - 219
Walter et al 2006; Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006). The impact of network capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation on university spin-off performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 541-567.
Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J. & Wright, M. (2001). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs, Research Policy, 40 (2011), 1128–1143.
Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy, 35, 481–501.
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).