Input, Output, and Behavioral Additionality of Innovation Subsidies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242019000400158Keywords:
Parametric matching, R&D&I, difference in differences, DANE, abandonment, patents, trademarks, innovation impedimentsAbstract
Using a Conditional Difference in Difference procedure and data for Colombia, we determine if firms that receive subsidies to innovation in the period 2010-2016 present additionality on input, output, and behavioral innovation variables. We found that there are differences among the additionalities of small and medium firms (SMEs) and big firms, and the existence of a crowding-out effect for internal R&D expenditures in SMEs. At the same time, we found additionality on R&D employment for all types of firms and the presence of experience effects introduced by subsidies, especially for SMEs. These effects are related to positive additionalities. At the same time, we cannot find additionality effects on patents and trademarks. However, we found negative additionality on sales of big companies that we relate with the way we measure this variable.Downloads
References
Aboal, D., & Garda, P. (2015). Does public financial support stimulate innovation and productivity? An impact evaluation. Recuperado de http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/38832
Aerts, K., & Czarnitzki, D. (2004). Using Innovation Survey Data to Evaluate R&D Policy : The Case of Belgium. SSRN Electronic Journal, (04), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572086
Aerts, K., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one?: Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy, 37(5), 806–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2008.01.011
Almus, M., & Czarnitzki, D. (2003). The Effects of Public R&D Subsidies on Firms’ Innovation Activities. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(2), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500103288618918
Arrow, K. J. (1972). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. En Readings in Industrial Economics (pp. 219–236). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_13
Autio, E., Kanninen, S., & Gustafsson, R. (2008). First- and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs. Research Policy, 37(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.012
Baldwin, J., & Lin, Z. (2002). Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. En Research Policy (Vol. 31). Recuperado de www.statcan.ca.
Barrios, F., Forero, C., & Perry, G. (2018). Public financial support and innovation in Colombian manufacturing firms. Working papers, 7, 1–35. Recuperado de http://www.scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/1159
Bodas-Freitas, I., Castellacci, F., Fontana, R., Malerba, F., & Vezzulli, A. (2017). Sectors and the additionality effects of R&D tax credits: A cross-country microeconometric analysis. Research Policy, 46(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.002
Busom, I. (2000). An Empirical Evaluation of The Effects of R&D Subsidies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9(2), 111–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590000000006
Busom, I., & Vélez-Ospina, J. A. (2017). Innovation, Public Support, and Productivity in Colombia. A Cross-industry Comparison. World Development, 99, 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2017.07.005
Catozzella, A., & Vivarelli, M. (2011). Beyond Additionality: Are Innovation Subsidies Counterproductive? IZA working paper, (5746). Recuperado de https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1863068
Cerulli, G. (2010, septiembre 1). Modelling and Measuring the Effect of Public Subsidies on Business R&D: A Critical Review of the Econometric Literature. Economic Record, Vol. 86, pp. 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2009.00615.x
Cerulli, G., & Potì, B. (2008). Evaluating the Effect of Public Subsidies on firm R&D activity: an Application to Italy Using the Community Innovation Survey. 9. Recuperado de http://www.ceris.cnr.it/ceris/workingpaper/2008/WP_9_08_CERULLI_POTI.pdf
Cerulli, G., & Potì, B. (2016). Explaining firm sensitivity to R&D subsidies within a dose-response model: The role of financial constraints, real cost of investment, and strategic value of R&D. En DEM Working Papers. Recuperado de Department of Economics and Management website: https://ideas.repec.org/p/trn/utwprg/2016-09.html
Choi, J., & Lee, J. (2017). Repairing the R&D market failure: Public R&D subsidy and the composition of private R&D. Research Policy, 46(8), 1465–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.009
Chudnovsky, D., Lopez, A., Rossi, M., & Ubfal, D. (2006). Evaluating a program of public funding of private innovation activities . An econometric study of FONTAR in Argentina. 1–42. Recuperado de https://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/2829
Cin, B. C., Kim, Y. J., & Vonortas, N. S. (2017). The impact of public R&D subsidy on small firm productivity: evidence from Korean SMEs. Small Business Economics, 48(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9786-x
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Mustar, P. (2009). Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective. Research Policy, 38(10), 1517–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.003
Crepon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairessec, J. (1998). Research, Innovation And Productivity: An Econometric Analysis At The Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2), 115–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599800000031
Crespi, G. A., & Maffioli, A. (2014). Design and evaluation of fiscal incentives for business innovation in Latin America: Lessons learned after 20 years of experimentation. En Science, Technology and Innovation Policies for Development: The Latin American Experience (pp. 225–253). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04108-7_10
Crespi, G., Garone, L. F., Maffioli, A., & Melendez, M. (2015). Long-term productivity effects of public support to innovation in Colombia. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.998080
Crespi, G., Giuliodori, D., Giuliodori, R., & Rodriguez, A. (2016). The effectiveness of tax incentives for R&D+i in developing countries: The case of Argentina. Research Policy, 45(10), 2023–2035. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2016.07.006
Czarnitzki, D., & Delanote, J. (2015). R&D policies for young SMEs: input and output effects. Small Business Economics, 45(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9661-1
Czarnitzki, D., & Delanote, J. (2017). Incorporating innovation subsidies in the CDM framework: empirical evidence from Belgium. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(1–2), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1202514
Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger, B., & Fier, A. (2007). The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(7), 1347–1366. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.992
Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger, K. (2018). Input and output additionality of R&D subsidies. Applied Economics, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1361010
Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2012). Evaluation of public R&D policies: a cross–country comparison. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 9(2), 254–282. https://doi.org/10.1504/wrstsd.2012.047690
Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2013, febrero 1). Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Research Policy, Vol. 42, pp. 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.008
Czarnitzki, D., & Lopes-Bento, C. (2014). Innovation Subsidies: Does the Funding Source Matter for Innovation Intensity and Performance? Empirical Evidence from Germany. Industry and Innovation, 21(5), 380–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2014.973246
D’Este, P., Iammarino, S., Savona, M., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2012). What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers. Research Policy, 41(2), 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2011.09.008
David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4), 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2016.01.002
Engel, D., Rothgang, M., & Eckl, V. (2016). Systemic aspects of R&D policy subsidies for R&D collaborations and their effects on private R&D. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146127
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Fukuyama, H., & Margaritis, D. (2011). DEA and endogenous technological change. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(2), 457–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.09.033
Fernández-Sastre, J., & Martín-Mayoral, F. (2015). The effects of developing-countries’ innovation support programs: evidence from Ecuador. Innovation, 17(4), 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1157447
Garcia, A., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Impact of government support on R&D and innovation. Unu-Merit, (31), 26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.1980.tb00220.x
González, X., & Pazó, C. (2008). Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending? Research Policy, 37(3), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.009
Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2007). The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D. Economica, 74(294), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00547.x
Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2016). Government-subsidized R&D and firm innovation: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 45(6), 1129–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.002
Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2009). The financing of R&D and innovation. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, 1(1 C), 609–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2
Heshmati, A., & Lööf, H. (2005). Sources of Finance , R&D Investment and Productivity : 1(11), 1–26. Recuperado de http://www.infra.kth.se/cesis/research/workpap.htm
Howell, A. (2017). Picking ‘winners’’ in China: Do subsidies matter for indigenous innovation and firm productivity?’ China Economic Review, 44, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.04.005
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401
Jaramillo, H., Lugones, F., & Salazar, M. (2000). Normalización de indicadores de innovación tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe :manual de Bogotá. Recuperado de http://www.sidalc.net/cgi-bin/wxis.exe/?IsisScript=BAC.xis&method=post&formato=2&cantidad=1&expresion=mfn=044526
Jiang, C., Zhang, Y., Bu, M., Liu, W., Jiang, C., Zhang, Y., … Liu, W. (2018). The Effectiveness of Government Subsidies on Manufacturing Innovation: Evidence from the New Energy Vehicle Industry in China. Sustainability, 10(6), 1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061692
Karhunen, H., & Huovari, J. (2015). R&D subsidies and productivity in SMEs. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 805–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9658-9
Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00182
Nelson, R. R. (1959). The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1086/258177
OCyT. (2017). Informe Anual de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología 2016. Recuperado de http://ocyt.org.co/proyectos-y-productos/informe-anual-de-indicadores-de-ciencia-y-tecnologia-2016/
OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. En Communities. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en
OECD, & Eurostat. (1997). Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264192263-en
Pellegrino, G., & Savona, M. (2017). No money, no honey? Financial versus knowledge and demand constraints on innovation. Research Policy, 46(2), 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2017.01.001
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
Sanguinetti, P. (2005). Innovation and R&D expenditures in Argentina: evidence from a firm level survey. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Department of …, 1–46. Recuperado de http://www.crei.cat/conferences/RandD_and_Innovation_in_the_Development_Process/activities/sc_conferences/23/papers/sanguinetti.pdf
Tello, M. D. (2015). Firms’ innovation, public financial support, and total factor productivity: The case of manufactures in Peru. Review of Development Economics, 19(2), 358–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12147
Villa, J. M. (2016). diff: Simplifying the estimation of difference-in-differences treatment effects. Stata Journal, 16(1), 52–71. Recuperado de https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v16y2016i1p52-71.html
Wanzenböck, I., Scherngell, T., & Fischer, M. M. (2013). How do firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies? Evidence for the Austrian transport sector. Technovation, 33(2–3), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHNOVATION.2012.11.006
Widmann, R. (2016). The Effect of Government Research Grants on Firm Innovation : Theory and Evidence from Austria ∗. (December). Recuperado de http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/widmann/Papers/Government Research Grants/Widmann_Government_Research_Grants.pdf
Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., & Galán, J. I. (2014). ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF PUBLIC SUBSIDIES ON FIRM R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), 36–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00738.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
