Governance structure promoting innovation: an exploratory study in Brazilian habitats
AbstractThis research aimed to investigate how the governance structure of innovation habitats may contribute to the development of innovation in resident companies. An exploratory study was conducted in INOVAPARQ and CELTA incubator, in Brazil. The empirical contexts were investigated by applying qualitative method with NVivo software. Critical success factors of governance were found: managerial relationships with different stakeholders; national and international training networks; and boosted resident companies monitoring by specific assessment tools. It was concluded that these factors are crucial to the innovation process of resident companies mostly by creating new products and services; sharing of inter-company knowledge; and motivating employees to work in a creative environment.
Adegbite, E. (2015). Good corporate governance in Nigeria: Antecedents, propositions and peculiarities. International Business Review, 24 (2), 319 - 330.
Amit, R. & Schoemaker P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33-46.
ANPROTEC – Associação Nacional de Entidades Promotoras de Empreendimentos Inovadores. (2015, August 12). Cenário Brasileiro de Parques Tecnológicos. Retrieved from www.anprotec.com.br
Baldwin, C. Y. & Von Hippel, E. (2011) Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organ. Sci., 22(6), 1399–1417
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck and business strategy. Journal of Management Science, 32 (10), 1231-1241. doi: http://econpapers.repec.org/article/inmormnsc/v_3a32_3ay_3a1986_3ai_3a10_3ap_3a1231-1241.htm
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, Vol. 17, N. 1. Retrieved fromhttp://jom.sagepub.com/content/17/1/99.abstract
Barney J. & Hesterly, S. (2012). Strategic Management and Competitive Advantage. New Delhi, pp. 40-48.
Becker, W. & Peters J. (1998). R&D-competition between vertical corporate networks: Market structure and strategic R&D-spillovers. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 6, 51-72.
Bernstein, S. (2012). Does going public affect innovation? Doctoral dissertation. doi: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10085978Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Biedenbach, T. & Muller, R. (2012). Absorptive, innovative and adaptative capabilities and their impact on Project and Project portfolio performance. Project Management, 30, 621-635.
Bobbio, N. (1987). The future of democracy: a defense of the rules of the game. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Caner, T.; Sun, J. & Prescott, J. E. (2014). When a firm's centrality in R&D alliance network is (not) the answer for invention: The interaction of centrality, inward and outward knowledge transfer, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33, 193-209.
Carliss Baldwin, Eric von Hippel, (2011) Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation. Organization Science, 22(6),1399-1417. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0618
Cassiman, B.; Veugelers, R. (2000). External technology sources: embodied or disembodied technology acquisition. doi: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=224582
Chao, Chih-Yang; Lin, Yong-Shun; Cheng, Yu-Lin; Liao, Shu-Chia. (2011). The research on the relationship among market orientation, absorptive capability, organizational innovation climate and innovative behavior in Taiwan’s manufacturing industry. African Journal of Business Management, 19 (5), 7855-7863.
CELTA. Centro Empresarial para Laboração de Tecnologias Avançadas. Retrieved from http://www.celta.org.br/
Cohen, W. & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1 (35), 128-152.
CPI. Ciudad Politécnica da Innovación. (2015) Retrieved fromhttp://cpi.upv.es
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), pp. 555 –590. doi: http://amj.aom.org/content/34/3/555.abstract
Dasgupta, P. & David, P.A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23 (5), 487-521.
Dosi, G., Nelson, R. & Winter, S. G. (2000). Nature & dynamics of organizational capabilities. New York: Oxford University Press, 1-22.
Fabrizio, K. (2009). Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38, 255–267.
Fallows J (2013). Dispatches from the Future. Joint Venture Silicon Valley: State of the Valley. San José, CA.
Filipova, V, Drozen, F. & Kubankova, M. (2016). Product Innovation and Public Support - Case Study of SME in the Tourist Industry. Journal of Tourism and Services, 7 (12), 7-19.
Flatten, T. C; et al. (2011).A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. Journal Elsevier-ESCP Europe, 98-116.
Fosfori, A. & Tribo, J. A. (2008). Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance, Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 36 (2), 173-187.
Foss, N., J. (1997). Resources and strategy: a brief overview of themes and contributions. In: FOSS, N., J. (org.). Resources, firms and strategies: a reader in the resource-based perspective. 1ª ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Graham, J., Amos, B. & Plumptre, T. (2003). Governance Principles for Protected Areas in the 21st Century. Durban, UICN.
Groenewegen, J. (2004). Who should control the firm? Insights from New and Original Institutionalist Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 38 (2), 353-61.
Hauknes, J. (1998). Services in innovation: innovation in services. Oslo: STEP group, STEP, Storgaten.
Humphrey, J. & Schmitz, H. (2000). Governance and upgrading: linking industrial cluster and global value chain research. Brighton Institute of Development Studies. doi: https://www.ids.ac.uk/files/Wp120.pdf
IASP – International Association of Science Parks. (2015, June 15). Conceitos gerais. Retrieved from http://www.iasp.ws
IDEAS. (2015, October 15). Instituto IDEAS. Retrieved from http://www.ideas.upv.es/
INOVAPARQ. Parque de Inovação Tecnológica de Joinville e Região. Retrieved from https://www.inovaparq.com.br/
Kapounek S, Krutilova V. (2016). Editorial Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences I, Volume 220; 2016. p. 251-260.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2006). Governance Matters V: aggregate and individual governance indicators for 1996–2005. The World Bank.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2018, July 26). The Worldwide Governance Indicators. Retrieved fromhttps://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/worldwide-governance-indicators
Knight, M. (2002). Governance in higher education corporations: A consideration of the constitution created by the 1992 act. Higher Education Quarterly, 56 (3), 276-286.
Kubota, L.C. (2009). As KIBS e a inovação tecnológica das firmas de serviços. Economia e Sociedade, Campinas, 18 (2), 349-369.
Lane, P. & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (5), 461-477.
Lane, P., Koka, B. & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31 (4), 833-863.
Lahorgue, M. A. (2006). Polos tecnológicos no Brasil: espontaneidade ou inovação social? I Congreso Iberoamericano de La Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad y Innovación.
Lichtenthaler, U. & Lichtenthaler, E. (2010). Technology transfer across organizational boundaries: absorptive capacity and desorptive capacity. California Management Review, 53 (1), 154-170.
Lobianco, M. M. L. & Ramos, A. S. M. (2004). Uso da internet no setor de hotelaria de recife: PE. RAE-Eletrônica, 3 (2).
Lopes, F. D. & Baldi, M. (2009). Redes como perspectiva de análise e como estrutura de governança: uma análise das diferentes contribuições. RAP. Rio de Janeiro, 43 (5), 1007-1035.
Ma, X. F.; Kaldenbach, M. & Katzy, B. (2014). Cross-border innovation intermediaries - matchmaking across institutional contexts. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26 (6), 703-716.
Markman, G., Phan, P., Balkin, D. & Gianiodis, P. (2005). Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (2), 241—263.
Mattor, K., Betsill, M, Huayhuaca, C., Huber-Stearns, H., Jedd, T., Sternlieb, F., Bixler, P., Luizza, M. & Cheng, A. S. (2014). Transdisciplinary research on environmental governance: A view from the inside. Environmental science & policy, 4 (2), 90–100.
Maurer, C. C., Bansal, P. & Crossan, M. M. (2010). Creating Economic Value Through Social Values: Introducing a Culturally Informed Resource-Based View. Organization Science. Articles in Advance, 1–17.
Melo, M. A. C & Magacho, L. A. M. (2013). Services for People Innovation Park – Planning Methodologies, J. Technol. Manag. Innov, 8, Special Issue ALTEC, 208-218.
Mills, K, Reynolds, E. & Reamer, A. (2008, September 17). Clusters and Competitiveness: A New Federal Role for Stimulating Regional Economies. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. doi: http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2008/04/competitiveness-mills
Mueller, M., Schmidt, A. & Kuerbis, B. (2013). Internet Security and Networked Governance in International Relations. International Studies Review, Vol. 15, pp. 86–104. doi: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/misr.12024/pdf
OECD. (2015, August 18). Manual de Oslo. Retrieved fromhttp://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/2367580.pdf
Peteraf, M.A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view, Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191.
Pipan, K. K., Gomiscek, B. & Mayer, J. (2012). Exploratory study of quality and excellence approaches and continuous improvement from the perspective of new institutionalism. Journal for East European Management Studies, 3, 313-332.
Pirayesh, A., Doumeingts, G., Seregni, M., Gusmeroli, S., Westphal, I., Gonzalez, L., Hans, C., Arino, M. J. N, Eugenio, A. C. & Laskurain, A. (2018). Conceptual Framework for Product Service Systems, 6 (2).
Qsrinternational. Software Nvivo. (2015, August 10). Retrieved fromhttp://www.qsrinternational.com
Robeson, D. & O’connor, G. (2007). The governance of innovation centers in large established companies. J. Eng. Technol. Manage, 24, 121–147.
Saito, R. & Silveira, A. D. M. (2008). Governança corporativa: custos de agência e estrutura de propriedade. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 48 (2), 79-86.
Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32 (4), 493-511.
Scott, W. R. (2004). Institutional theory: contributing to a theoretical research program. In: Smith K. G.; Hittm. A. (Eds)Great Minds in Management.
Schmitz, H. & Humphrey, J. (2000). Governance and Upgrading: Linking Industrial Cluster and Global Value Chain Research. In: IDS Working Paper 120. IDS – Institute of Development Studies. UK.
Schmidt, S. & Balestrin, A. (2015). Brazilian Incubators and Science Parks’ Resources and R&D Collaboration. J. Technol. Manag. Innov, 10 (3), 32-43.
Schreyöegg, G. & Kliesch-Eberl, M. (2007). How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (9), 913–933.
Schumpeter, J. A. Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e ciclo econômico; tradução de Maria Sílvia Possas. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1997.
Spolidoro, R. (1999). Habitats de inovação e empreendedores: agentes de transformação das estruturas sociais. Techbahia: Baiana Tenol.
Sureeyatanapas, P., Poophiukhok, P. & Pathumnakul, S. (2018). Green initiatives for logistics service providers: An investigation of antecedent factors and the contributions to corporate goals. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 191, 1-14.
Tabas, J. & Beranova, M. (2016). Innovation Life Cycle. 19th International Conference Enterprise and Competitive Environment, 513-521.
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509–533.
Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W. & de Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organi- 56 Clusters and knowledge zational forms and combinative capabilities. Organizational Science, 10(5), 551–68.
Vázquez, B. G. (2007). Red interorganizativa de cooperación en areas tecnológicas, J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2007, 2 (2), 125-135.
Vega-Jurado, J., Kask, S. & Manjarrés-Henriquez, L. (2017). University industry links and product innovation: cooperate or contract? J. Technol. Manag. Innov, 12 (3), 1-8.
Veugelers, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy, 6, 303-315.
Veugelers, R & Cassiman, B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28, 63-80.
Virtanen, M., Heimonen, I. & Sepponen, M. (2014). Stakeholder analysis and questionnaire showing the way for the development of business and service models, Renewable Energy Research Conference, 58, 51-57.
Xie, X. M.; Wang, L. J. & Zeng, S. X. (2018). Inter-organizational knowledge acquisition and firms' radical innovation: A moderated mediation analysis, Journal of Business Research, 90, 295-306.
Wang, M. C.; Chen, P. C. & Fang, S. C. (2018). A critical view of knowledge networks and innovation performance: The mediation role of firms' knowledge integration capability, Journal of Business Research, 88, 222-233.
Werle, F. O. C. (2011). Políticas de avaliação em larga escala na educação básica: Do controle de resultados à intervenção nos processos de operacionalização do ensino. doi: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ensaio/v19n73/03.pd
Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 991-995.
Yang, C-H., Motohashi, K. & Chen, J. R. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 38 (1), 77-85.
Zahra, S. A. & George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A review, Reconceptualization and extension. Academyof Management Review, 27, 185-203.
Zahra, S., Sapienza, H. & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (4), 917-955. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x
Zouain, D. M. (2003). Contribuições para o planejamento de parques tecnológicos urbanos. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 2 (1), 1-13.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).