A leadership competency model of science and technology parks: the case of Chungbuk Techno Park in Korea
Keywords:leadership, competency model, boundary spanning, incubator.
AbstractGiven their significant regional economic benefits, science and technology parks (STPs) have attracted continuous academic attention. To understand the predictors of performance of STPs, this study focuses on the critical impacts of leaders and develops a leadership competency model specialized for public STP leaders. The competency model identifies the qualities and conditions of an effective leader of public STPs, emphasizing management skills, bottom-up approach, and boundary spanning skills. To provide empirical support, this study adopts the case study approach and performs a behavior event interview with one of the most successful leaders of public STPs in Korea.
Albahari, A., Catalano, G., & Landoni, P. (2013). Evaluation of national science park systems: a theoretical framework and its application to the Italian and Spanish systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(5), 599-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.785508
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of management review, 2(2), 217-230.
Alldredge, M. E., & Nilan, K. J. (2000). 3M's leadership competency model: An internally developed solution. Human Resource Management, 39(2, 3), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-050X(200022/23)39:2/3%3C133::AID-HRM4%3E3.0.CO;2-8
Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1), 20-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.008
Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A. I., Nosella, A., & Petroni, G. (2006). Assessing science parks' performances: directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26(4), 489-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.002
Bøllingtoft, A. (2012). The bottom-up business incubator: Leverage to networking and cooperation practices in a self-generated, entrepreneurial-enabled environment. Technovation, 32(5), 304-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.005
Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 225-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x
Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2006). The relative importance of the top management team's managerial skills. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 9-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437720610652817
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117
Ernst, C., & Chrobot-Mason, D. (2011). Flat world, hard boundaries: How to lead across them. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(3), 1-8.
Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 381-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.005
Halbesleben, J. R., Novicevic, M. M., Harvey, M. G., & Buckley, M. R. (2003). Awareness of temporal complexity in leadership of creativity and innovation: A competency-based model. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 433-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00046-8
Hannon, P. D. (2005). Incubation policy and practice: building practitioner and professional capability. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(1), 57-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14626000510579644
Hollenbeck, G. P., McCall, M. W., & Silzer, R. F. (2006). Leadership competency models. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 398-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.003
Hood, C., & Lodge, M. (2004). Competency, bureaucracy, and public management reform: A comparative analysis. Governance, 17(3), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00248.x
Hu, A. G. (2007). Technology parks and regional economic growth in China. Research Policy, 36(1), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.003
KISTEP (Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning). (2012). Special Evaluation Report on Techno Park Construction Policy (in Korean). KISTEP.
Koontz, T. M., & Newig, J. (2014). From Planning to Implementation: Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Approaches for Collaborative Watershed Management. Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 416-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12067
Lalkaka, R. (1996). Technology business incubators: critical determinants of success. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 798(1), 270-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb24870.x
Lee, K. J. (2014). Development of boundary-spanning organisations in Japanese universities for different types of university–industry collaborations: a resource dependence perspective. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 22(2), 204-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2014.973164
Lee, K. J., Ohta, T., & Kakehi, K. (2010). Formal boundary spanning by industry liaison offices and the changing pattern of university–industry cooperative research: the case of the University of Tokyo. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(2), 189-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537320903498538
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). US science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities. International Journal of industrial organization, 21(9), 1323-1356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00085-7
Lucia, A. D., & Lepsinger. R. (1999). Art & Science of Competency Models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Marrelli, A. F., Tondora, J., & Hoge, M. A. (2005). Strategies for developing competency models. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 32(5-6), 533-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-005-3264-0
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for" intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034092
McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00065
Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2010). Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 437-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.09.003
Oh, S. H., & Lee. K. J. (2013). Governance System of Governmental R&D Programs: Formation and Transformation of the Framework Act on Science and Technology in Korea. Science and Public Policy (40), 492-503. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct002
Ossenbrink, J., Finnsson, S., Bening, C. R., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2018). Delineating policy mixes: Contrasting top-down and bottom-up approaches to the case of energy-storage policy in California. Research Policy. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.014
Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00055-0
Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.014
Sternberg, R. (2004). Technology centres in Germany: economic justification, effectiveness and impact on high-tech regions. International Journal of Technology Management, 28(3-6), 444-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.005298
Takanashi, C., & Lee, K. J. (2018). Boundary spanning leadership, resource mobilisation, and performance of university-industry R&D projects: a study in a Japanese university. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1490397
Talbot, M. (2004). Monkey see, monkey do: a critique of the competency model in graduate medical education. Medical Education, 38(6), 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01794.x
Testa, M. R., & Sipe, L. (2012). Service-leadership competencies for hospitality and tourism management. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 648-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.08.009
Thach, E., & Thompson, K. J. (2007). Trading places: Examining leadership competencies between for-profit vs. public and non-profit leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(4), 356-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437730710752229
Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289-305. doi: 10.2307/255842
Vanderstraeten, J., and Matthyssens, P. (2012). Service-based differentiation strategies for business incubators: Exploring external and internal alignment. Technovation, 32(12), 656-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.09.002
Vedovello, C. (1997). Science parks and university-industry interaction: geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force. Technovation, 17(9), 491-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00027-8
Wart, M. V. (2003). Public‐Sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00281
Westhead, P. (1997). R&D ‘inputs’ and ‘outputs’ of technology‐based firms located on and off Science Parks. R&D Management, 27(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00041
Westhead, P., & Batstone, S. (1998). Independent technology-based firms: the perceived benefits of a science park location. Urban Studies, 35(12), 2197-2219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098983845
Yang, C. H., Motohashi, K., & Chen, J. R. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative?: Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 38(1), 77-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.001
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).