Exploring Knowledge Transfer at UC Engineering School
I explore the degree to which patents represent magnitude of knowledge transferred from University to Industry. Building on the Agrawal & Henderson (2002) framework, I compare two MIT engineering departments and the School of Engineering of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC Engineering). Based on quantitative and qualitative data I estimated the relative importance of patenting as a knowledge transfer mechanism. I found that in UC Engineering patenting and publishing activity have increased steadily, in line with faculty size increase. However, patenting is perceived by academics as a relatively less important technology transfer channel, and in terms of production counting it appears much less relevant. Although in terms of relative importance of publishing over patenting as a technology transfer channel both are relatively similar, in the perception of faculty; in terms of production counting there is a substantial difference. I suggest some plausible explanations, proposing new avenues for research.
Arvanitis, Spyros; Kubli, Ursulina; Woerter, Martin. 2008. University-Industry Knowledge and Technology Transfer in Switzerland: What University Scientists Think About Co-operation with Private Enterprises. Research Policy N°37 (2008). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.005
Bekkers, Rudi; Bodas Freitas; Isabel Maria. 2008. Analysing Knowledge Transfer Channels Between Universities and Industry: To What Degree do Sectors Also Matter? Research Policy N°37 (2008). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
Bodas Freitas, Isabel Maria; Marques, Rosane Argou Marques; De Paula e Silva, Evando Mirra. 2013. University – Industry Collaboration and Innovation in Emergent and Mature Industries in new Industrialized Countries. Research Policy N°42 (2013). B.V. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.006
Bozeman, Barry; Rimes, Heather; Youtie, Jan. 2015. The Evolving State-of-the-art in Technology Transfer Research: Revisiting the Contingent Effectiveness Model. Research Policy N°44 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008
Bruneel, Johan; D’Este, Pablo; Salter, Ammon. 2010. Investigating the Factors that Diminish the Barriers to University – Industry Collaboration. Research Policy N°39 (2010). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006
Clarysse, Bart; Tartari, Valentina; Salter, Ammon. 2011. The Impact of Entrepreneurial Capacity, Experience and Organizational Support on Academic Entrepreneurship. Research Policy N°40. Elsevier B. V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010
CONICYT. 2017. Dimensiones de la Producción Científica Nacional - Programa de Información Científica CONICYT. URL: https://dataciencia.conicyt.cl/interfaz/. Downloaded on November 20th 2017.
Consejo Nacional de Innovación para el Desarrollo. 2017. Estrategia Nacional de Innovación para el Desarrollo 2nd. Ed.
Crespi, Gustavo; D’Este, Pablo; Fontana, Roberto; Geuna, Aldo. 2011. The Impact of Academic Patenting on University Research and its Transfer. Research Policy N°40 (2011). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.010
DICTUC SA. 2016. Annual Report 2015. https://www.dictuc.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Annual-Report-Dictuc-2016-.pdf
Giuliani, Elisa; Morrison, Andrea; Pietrobelli, Carlo; Rabellotti, Roberta. 2010. Who are the Researchers that are Collaborating with Industry? An Analysis of the Wine Sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy. Research Policy N°39 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.007
Hewitt-Dundas, Nola. 2012. Research Intensity and Knowledge Transfer Activity in UK Universities. Research Policy N°41 (2012). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.010
Johnson, William. 2011. Managing University Technology Development Using Organizational Control Theory. Research Policy N°40 (2011). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.010
Kleinknecht, Alfred & Reinders, Henk Jan. (2012). How Good Are Patents as Innovation Indicators? Evidence from German CIS Data. Innovation and Growth: From R&D Strategies of Innovating Firms to Economy-wide Technological Change. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646685.003.0006
Landry, Rejean; Saihi, Malek; Amara, Nabil; Ouimet, Mathieu. 2010. Evidence on How Academics Manage their Portfolio of Knowledge Transfer Activities. Research Policy N°39 (2010). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.003
Maietta, Ornella Wanda. 2015. Determinants of University – Firm R&D Collaboration and its Impact on Innovation: A Perspective from a low-tech Industry. Research Policy N°44 (2015). B.V. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.006
National Academy of Inventors. 2017. Top 100 Worldwide Universities Granted U.S. Utility Patents in 2016. http://www.academyofinventors.com/pdf/top-100-universities-2016.pdf
Perkmann, Markus, Kin, Zella & Pavelin, Stephen. 2011. Engaging Excellence? Effects of Faculty Quality on University Engagement with Industry. Research Policy N°40 (2011). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.007
Perkmann, Markus; Tartari, Valentina; McKelvey, Maureen; Autio, Erikko; Broström, Anders; D’Este, Pablo; Fini, Riccardo; Geuna, Aldo; Grimaldi, Rosa; Hughes, Alan; Krabel, Stefan; Kitson, Michael; Llerena, Patrick; Lissoni, Franceso; Salter, Ammon; Sobrero, Maurizio. 2013. Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University – Industry Relations. Research Policy N°42 (2013). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Petralia, Sergio; Balland, Pierre-Alexandre; Morrison, Andrea. 2017. Climbing the Ladder of Technological Development. Research Policy N°46 (2017). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.012
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. 2016. School of Engineering. [email protected]
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. 2017. School of Engineering. Report Diagnostic of Academic Entrepreneurship Situation.
Rasmussen, Einar; Borch, Odd Jarl. 2010. University Capabilities in Facilitating Entrepreneurship: A Longitudinal Study of Spin-off Ventures at Mid-range Universities. Research Policy N°39 (2010). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.002
Sengupta, Abhijit & Ray, Amit S. 2017. University Research and Knowledge Transfer: A Dynamic View of Ambidexteriry in British Universities. Research Policy N°46 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.008
Van Looy, Bart; Landoni, Paolo; Callaert, Julie; Van Pottelsberghe; Sapsalis, Eleftherios; Debackere, Koenraad. 2011. Entrepreneurial Effectiveness on European Universities: An Empirical Assessment of antecedents and Trade-Offs. Research Policy N°40 (2011). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.001
World Intellectual Property Organization. 2017. World Intellectual Property Indicators 2017. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_941_2017.pdf
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).