Patents Go to The Market? University-Industry Technology Transfer from a Brazilian Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242018000300024Keywords:
technology transfer, university-industry, brazilian universities, TTO, Innovation.Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the TT between university-industry from a Brazilian perspective, with special reference on the university Intellectual Property – IP and TT legal instruments. The methodology was designed on a quantitative approach aiming to provide a better understanding of the problem. Secondary data collection was performed through documentary analysis that aims to identify and quantify the variables related to patents, licensing and TT agreements. Later, data are grouped, classified and treated, which allowed inference and interpretation. The results show that the TT between university-industry is in an embryonic stage in Brazil, even if occurred a considerable increase of IP required over the last few years. In this context, it is possible to affirm that the academic research outcomes are not being absorbed in an effective way by the industries, and, as a consequence, just an insignificant percentage of the patents go to the market.Downloads
Metrics
References
Ambos, T.C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., d'Este, P. (2008). When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 8, pp. 1424-1447. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00804.x
Anatan, L. (2015). Conceptual Issues in University to Industry Knowledge Transfer Studies: A Literature Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, pp. 711-717. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.090
Audretsch, D.B., Lehmann, E.E., Wright, M. (2014). Technology transfer in a global economy. Journal Technology Transfer, 39, pp. 301-312. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9283-6
AUTM, 2002. The AUTM Licensing Survey: Fiscal Year 2000. Association of University Technology Managers, Norwalk, CT. Retrieved from:http://www.worldcat.org/title/autm-licensing-survey-fiscal-year-2000/oclc/50194535
Bekkers, R., & Bodas-Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37, 1837-1853. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
Bessant, J., Rush, H. (1993). Government support of manufacturing innovation: two country level case study. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management, 40, 1, pp. 79-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/17.206655. Retrieved from:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/206655/
Bodas-Freitas, I. M., Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2011). Patterns of Collaborations between Regional Firms and Universities: Evidence from the Piedmont region in Italy. Collaborations? LEI & BRICK Working Paper 05/2011, Department of Economics, University of Torino, pp 1-33. Retrieved from: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/utolabeco/201105.htm
Bölling, M., & Eriksson, Y. (2016). Collaboration with society: The future role of universities? Identifying challenges for evaluation. Research evaluation, 25(2), 209-218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv043
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research policy, 29(4), 627-655. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1
Brazil. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Demographic Census 2010. Retrieved from: https://ww2.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2010/default.shtm
Brazil. Federal Law n. 10.973, dated december 2, 2004. Provides incentives for innovation and scientific and technological research in the productive environment and other measures. Presidency of the Republico f Brazil. Brasilia, DF. Retrieved from:http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2004/lei/l10.973.htm
Brazil. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI). Science, Technology and Innovation for National Development. National Strategy for Science Technology and Innovation 2016 - 2019. Brasília, 2016. Retrieved from:http://www.propesq.unir.br/uploads/76767676/arquivos/Estrat_gia_Nacional_de_Ci_ncia__Tecnologia_e_Inova__o_2016_2019_1248378469.pdf
Buka?a, A. (2008). What innovation and technology transfer really mean?. Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 2, 74-76. Retrieved from:http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BUJ5-0020-0010
Burhanuddin, M.A., Arif, F., Azizah, V., Prabuwono, A.S. (2009). Barriers and challenges for technology transfer in Malaysian small and medium industries. In Information Management and Engineering, 2009. ICIME'09. International Conference on, pp. 258-261. doi:10.1109/ICIME.2009.39. Retrieved from:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5077038/
Casali, Giovana F. Rossi, Silva, Orlando Monteiro da, & Carvalho, Fátima M. A.. (2010). Regional innovation system: study of Brazilian regions. Journal of Contemporary Economics, 14(3), 515-550. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-98482010000300004
Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative performance of U.K. University technology transfer offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34, 3, pp. 369-384. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.007
Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40, 1084-1093. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010
Crespi, G. A., Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. (2007). The mobility of university inventors in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(3), 195-215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9012-0
Crespi, G., D’Este, P., Fontana, R., & Geuna, A. (2011). The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Research policy, 40(1), 55-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.010
Cruz, G., & Bezerra, N. V. S. (2017). Innovation in renewable energies: reflections and study of technological prospection. SENAC Technical Bulletin, 43(1). Retrieved from:http://www.bts.senac.br/index.php/bts/article/view/408/374
Cruz, G; Menuchi, L. N. S. (2016), Technology transfer and biodiversity: Analysis of Brazilian legislation through the access and benefits sharing perspective. International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research, v. 4, n. 1, 2017. Retrieved from:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gustavo_Da_Cruz/publication/313649984_Technology_Transfer_and_Biodiversity_Analiysis_of_Brazilian_Legislation_throught_the_acess_and_benefits_sharing_perspective/links/58a186edaca272046aad8e52/Technology-Transfer-and-Bi
Dooley, L., & Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration: Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3), 316-332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710776734
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2015). The Global Innovation Index 2015 (GII). Effective Innovation Policies for Development, Cornell University, INSEAD, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id7491.html
Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27, pp. 823-833.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. Science & Public Policy, 25, 3, pp. 195-203.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/spp/25.3.195
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (1999). The Future Location of Research and Technology Transfer, Journal of Technology Transfer, 24, pp. 111-123. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007807302841
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29, 2, 109-123. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university–industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research policy, 35(2), 309-323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.001
Fujino, A., & Stal, E. (2007). Management of intellectual property in the Brazilian public university: guidelines for licensing and commercialization. Business Review, 12(1), 104-120. doi: https://doi.org/10.7867/1980-4431.2007v12n1p104-120
Geisler, E., Turchetti, G. (2015). Commercialization of Technological Innovations: The Effects of Internal Entrepreneurs and Managerial and Cultural Factors on Public–Private Inter-Organizational Cooperation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 12, 02, 1550009. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219877015500091
Gervais, M.J., Marion, C., Dagenais, C., Chiocchio, F., Houlfort, N. (2016). Dealing with the complexity of evaluating knowledge transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, pp. 666-678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv034
Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research policy, 35(6), 790-807. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005
Geuna, A., Muscio, A. (2009). The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature. Minerva, March, pp. 93-114. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2
Greene, K. (1994). Technology and innovation in context: the Roman background to mediaeval and later development. Journal of Roman Archaeology, 7, pp. 22-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047759400012484
Guan, J.C., Mok, C.K., Yam, R.C.M., Chin, K.S.M., Pun, K.F. (2006). Technology transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, pp. 666-678. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.05.009
Günsel, A. (2015). Research on Effectiveness of Technology Transfer from a Knowledge Based Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 777–785. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.165
Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825-838. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.006
Holt, R. (1990). Milling Technology in the Middle Ages: The Direction of Recent Research Journal. Industrial Archaeology Review, 13, pp.1-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/iar.1990.13.1.50
INPI. National Institute of Industrial Property (2016). Technology transfer. Retrieved from: http://www.inpi.gov.br/menu-servicos/transferencia.
Jafari, M., Akhavan, P., & Rafiei, A. (2014). Technology Transfer Effectiveness in Knowledge-Based Centers Providing a Model Based on Knowledge Management. International Journal of Scientific Knowledge. Retrieved from:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2424197
Kenney, M., & Mowery, D. C. (Eds.). (2014). Public universities and regional growth: Insights from the University of California. Stanford University Press.
Kim, Y., & Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Technology licensing partners. Journal of Economics and Business, 58(4), 273-289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2005.10.004
Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 1-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm020
Macho-Stadler, I., Pérez-Castrillo, D., & Veugelers, R. (2007). Licensing of university inventions: The role of a technology transfer office. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(3), 483-510. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2006.06.001
Markman, G. D., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2008). Research and technology commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1401-1423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00803.x
Markman, G.D., Gianiodis, P.T., Phan, P.H., Balkin, D.B. (2005). Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market. Research Policy, 34, pp. 1058-1075. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.007
Mattila, M., & Lehtimaki, H. (2016). Networks in Technology Commercialization. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 5(1), 43-54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2277977916634235
Mazzucato, M., & Penna, C. (2016). The Brazilian innovation system: a mission-oriented policy proposal. Retrieved from:https://www.cgee.org.br/documents/10195/1774546/The_Brazilian_Innovation_System-CGEE-MazzucatoandPenna-FullReport.pdf
Molas-Gallart, J., Castro-Martínez, E. (2007). Ambiguity and conflict in the development of ‘Third Mission’indicators. Research Evaluation, 16, 4, pp. 321-330. doi: https://doi.org/10.3152/095820207X263592:
Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. Z. (2015). Markets versus spillovers in outflows of university research. Research Policy, 44, 50-66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.07.019
Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Vallanti, G. (2014). University regulation and university–industry interaction: a performance analysis of Italian academic departments. Industrial and Corporate Change Advance, 1, 1-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtu022
National Confederation of Industry, Social Service of Industry, National Service of Industrial Learning, Brazilian Service of Support to Micro and Small Companies (CNI, 2016.).Performance of Brazil in the global index of innovation 2011-2016. Brasilia, DF. Retrieved from:http://www.ipdeletron.org.br/wwwroot/pdf-publicacoes/34/desempenho_do_brasil_no_indice_global_de_inovacao_2011_2016.pdf
OECD. (2007). Higher education and regions: Globally competitive, locally engaged. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/education/imhe/highereducationandregionsgloballycompetitivelocallyengaged.htm
Pausits, A. (2015). The Knowledge Society and Diversification of Higher Education: From the Social: Contract to the Mission of Universities. In: Curaj, A. et al. (Org.) The European Higher Education Area: Between Critical Reflections and Future Policies. Springer. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_18
Perkmann, M., & Schildt, H. (2015). Open data partnerships between firms and universities: The role of boundary organizations. Research Policy, 44(5), 1133-1143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.006
Perkmann, M., Fini, R., Ross, J., Salter, A., Silvestri, C., Tartari, V. (2015). Accounting for universities’ impact: Using augmented data to measure academic engagement and commercialization by academic scientists. Research Evaluation, 24, 4, pp. 380-391. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv020
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research policy, 42, 2, pp. 423-442. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Phan, P. H., & Siegel, D. S. (2006). The effectiveness of university technology transfer. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 77-144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000006
Piirainen, K. A., Andersen, P. D., & Andersen, A. D. (2016). Foresight and the third mission of universities: The case for innovation system foresight. Foresight, 8(1), 1-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/fs-04-2014-0026
Pimentel, L. O. (2010). Basic manual of R&D partnership agreements: legal aspects. EDIPUCRS. Retrieved from:http://www.fortec.org.br/documentos/MANUAL_BASICO_ACORDOS.pdf
Póvoa, L. M. C., & Rapini, M. S. (2010). Technology transfer from universities and public research institutes to firms in Brazil: what is transferred and how the transfer is carried out. Science and Public Policy, 37(2), 147–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210x496619
Ramirez, P., Love, J. H., & Vahter, P. (2013). Industry–academic links: A new phase in Ireland’s FDI-led industrialisation strategy. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(2), 167-181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413493632
Ranga, M., Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry & Higher Education, 27, 3, pp. 237-262. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
Ranga, M., Temel, S., Murat Ar, I., Yesilay, R.B., Sukan, F.V. (2016). Building Technology Transfer Capacity in Turkish Universities: a critical analysis. European Journal of Education, 51, 1, pp. 09-106. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12164
Reddy, M., Zhao, l. (1990). International technology transfer: A review. Research Policy, 19, 4, pp. 285-307. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90015-X
Schaeffer, P. R., Dullius, A. C., Maldonado, R., & Zawislak, P. A. (2015). Types of university-industry interaction: A new approach to bridge the gap between universities and industries. XVI Congresso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestão Tecnologia. ALETC, Porto Alegre, Brasil. Retrieved from:http://altec2015.nitec.co/altec/papers/595.pdf
Shane, S. (2002). Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 122–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.122.14281
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2007). The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research. Entrepreneurship, 171–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8_8
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640-660. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grm036
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
Taheri, M., Geenhuizen, M. (2016). Teams' boundary-spanning capacity at university: Performance of technology projects in commercialization. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, in press. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.003
Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major US universities. The journal of Technology transfer, 26, 1-2, pp. 59-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007884111883
Torkomian, A. L. V. (2009). Overview of the nuclei of technological innovation in Brazil. Technology transfer. Campinas: Komedi, 21-37. Retrived from:https://www.inova.unicamp.br/sites/default/files/documents/Livro%20Transferencia%20de%20tecnologia_0.pdf
Verhoeven, D., Bakker, J., & Veugelers, R. (2016). Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators. Research Policy, 45(3), 707–723. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.010
Wahab, S.A., Rose, R.C., Wati, O.S.I. (2012). Defining the Concepts of Technology and Technology Transfer: A Literature Analysis. International Business Research, 5, 1, pp. 61-71. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n1p61
Wallin, J., Isaksson, O., Larsson, A., & Elfström, B. O. (2014). Bridging the gap between university and industry: three mechanisms for innovation efficiency. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 11(01), 1440005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877014400057
Walter, S. G., Schmidt, A., & Walter, A. (2016). Patenting rationales of academic entrepreneurs in weak and strong organizational regimes. Research Policy, 45(2), 533-545. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.008
Warren, L., Kitagawa, F., & Eatough, M. (2010). Developing the Knowledge Economy through University Linkages. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 11(4), 293–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.5367/ijei.2010.0005
Wright, M., Birley, S., Mosey, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship and University Technology Transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, pp. 235-246. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034121.02507.f3
Zhao, L., Reisman, A. (1992). Toward Meta Research on Technology Transfer. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39, 1, pp. 13-21. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/17.119659. Retrieved from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/119659/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
