Marketing Myopia in Brazilian Public Universities: An Empirical Study Involving Academicians
Keywords:patent innovation, factorial analysis, entrepreneurship, technology transfer, market orientation.
AbstractThe objective of this study was to understand the role of marketing, from research to commercialization of technologies in Brazilian public universities. To that end, an online survey was conducted, involving 236 academicians associated with in Brazilian public universities. The data obtained were subjected to exploratory factor analysis and descriptive statistics. The results revealed the low utilization of proactive market analyses in Brazilian public universities, as well as the limited integration of marketing through interaction with companies. The strategic orientation prevalent in BPUs was geared to technology, at the expense of relationships with society and the market. An entrepreneurial orientation was not observed. The actions to promote or encourage the transfer of Brazilian public universities technologies to the market proved timid. Finally, there were several obstacles to the implementation of marketing in Brazilian public universities, characterizing the so called marketing myopia.
American Marketing Association. (2015). Definition of marketing (approved July 2013). Retrieved from https://www.ama.org/aboutama/pages/definition-of-marketing.aspx.
Antonialli, F., Antonialli, L. M., & Antonialli, R. (2017). Uses and abuses of the Likert scale: bibliometric study in the proceedings of Enanpad from 2010 to 2015. Reuna, 22(4), Oct-Dec, 1-18.
Baker, M. J. (2003). Marketing book. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Becker, M. C., & Lillemark, M. (2006). Marketing/R&D integration in the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 35(1), 105–120. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.09.005.
Bodlaj, M. (2010). The impact of a responsive and proactive market orientation on innovation and business performance. Economic and Business Review, 12(4), 241–261.
Bodlaj, M. (2012). Do managers at two hierarchical levels differ in how they assess their company’s market orientation? Journal for East European Management Studies, 17(3), 292–312.
Boehm, D. N., & Hogan, T. (2013). Science-to-business collaborations: A science-to-business marketing perspective on scientific knowledge commercialization. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(4), 564–579. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.12.001.
Bouncken, R. B., Plüschke, B. D., Pesch, R., & Kraus, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation in vertical alliances: Joint product innovation and learning from allies. Review of Managerial Science, 10(2), 381–409. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0150-8.
Brodie, R. J., & Coviello, N. E. (2008). Contemporary marketing practices research program: A review of the first decade. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 23(2), 84–94.
Calderon-Martinez, M. G., & Garcia-Quevedo, J. (2013). Knowledge transfer and university patents in Mexico. Academia-Revista Latinoamericana De Administracion, 26(1), 33–60. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/arla-05-2013-0039.
Coviello, N. E., Brodie, R. J., Danaher, P. J., & Johnston, W. J. (2002). How firms relate to their markets: An empirical examination of contemporary marketing practices. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 33–46.
Coviello, N. E., Brodie, R. J., & Munro, H. J. (1997). Understanding contemporary marketing: Development of a classification scheme. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(6), 501–522. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1997.9964490
Field, A. (2009). Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS (2nd ed.). Porto Alegre: Artmed/Bookman.
Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(3), 191–215.
Gummesson, E. (1991). Marketing orientation revisited: The crucial role of the part-time marketer. European Journal of Marketing, 25(2), 60–75. doi: http://doi:10.1108/03090569110139166.
Hair Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2005). Análise Multivariada de Dados (5th ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Hakala, H. (2011). Strategic orientations in management literature: Three approaches to understanding the interaction between market, technology, entrepreneurial and learning orientations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00292.x.
Hall, J., Matos, S., Bachor, V., & Downey, R. (2014). Commercializing university research in diverse settings moving beyond standardized intellectual property management. Research-Technology Management, 57(5), 26-34. http://doi.org/10.5437/08956308x5705250.
Hsu, D. W. L., Shen, Y.-C., Yuan, B. J. C., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.002.
Ismail, N., Nor, M. J. M., & Sidek, S. (2015). A framework for a successful research products commercialisation: A case of Malaysian academic researchers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 283–292.
Jeong, I., Pae, J. H., & Zhou, D. S. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of the strategic orientations in new product development: The case of Chinese manufacturers. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.06.010
Kaymaz, K., & Eryi?it, K. Y. (2011). Determining factors hindering university-industry collaboration: An analysis from the perspective of academicians in the context of entrepreneurial science paradigm. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 4(1), 185–213.
Kerr, G., & Patti, C. (2015). Strategic IMC: From abstract concept to marketing management tool. Journal of Marketing Communications, 21(5), 317–339.
Klein, R., Haan, U., & Goldberg, A. I. (2010). Overcoming obstacles encountered on the way to commercialize university IP. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 671–679. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-009-9143-1.
Kliewe, T., Baaken, T., & Kesting, T. (2012). Introducing a science-to-business marketing unit to university knowledge and technology transfer structures: Activities, benefits, success factors. In A. Szopa, W. Karwowski, & P. O. D. Pablos (Eds.), Academic entrepreneurship and technological innovation: A business management perspective (1st ed., pp. 53–74). Hershey, PA, IGI Global.
Kotler, P. (1972). A generic concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 36(2), 46–54. doi:10.2307/1250977
Lee, D. (2013). What is marketing? Public Services Quarterly, 9(2), 169–171. doi:10.1080/15228959.2013.785900
Levitt, T. (2004). Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, 82(7/8), 138–149.
Malhotra, N. K., Rocha, I., Laudisio, M. C., Altheman, É., & Borges, F. M. (2005). Introdução à pesquisa de marketing. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Malvezzi, F. d. A., & Zambalde, A. L. (2013). Abordagem de marketing no processo de inovação tecnológica em uma universidade mineira. Revista FSA, 10(1), 25–39.
Malvezzi, F. d. A., Zambalde, A. L., & Rezende, D. C. d. (2014). Marketing de patentes à inovação: Um estudo multicaso em universidades brasileiras. REMark, 13(5), 109–123.
Markman, G. D., Gianiodis, P. T., Phan, P. H., & Balkin, D. B. (2005). Innovation speed: Transferring university technology to market. Research Policy, 34(7), 1058–1075. doi: http://doi.org.10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.007.
Marozau, R., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2016). Impacts of universities in different stages of economic development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–21. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0359-7.
Matsuno, K., Zhu, Z., & Rice, M. P. (2014). Innovation process and outcomes for large Japanese firms: Roles of entrepreneurial proclivity and customer equity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 1106–1124. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12147.
Mohr, J. J., & Sarin, S. (2009). Drucker’s insights on market orientation and innovation: Implications for emerging areas in high-technology marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(1), 85–96. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0101-5.
Mu, J. (2015). Marketing capability, organizational adaptation and new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 49, 151–166. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.003.
Mu, J., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2011). Strategic orientations and new product commercialization: Mediator, moderator, and interplay. R & D Management, 41(4), 337–359.
Nabi, G., & Liñán, F. (2013). Considering business start-up in recession time: The role of risk perception and economic context in shaping the entrepreneurial intent. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 19(6), 633–655.
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/1251757.
Payumo, J., Gang, Z., Pulumbarit, E., Jones, K., Maredia, K., & Grimes, H. (2012). Managing intellectual property and technology commercialization: Comparison and analysis of practices, success stories and lessons learned from public research universities in developing Asia. Innovation-Management Policy & Practice, 14(4), 478–494.
Pereira, R. D. S., Franco, I. D., Santos, I. C., & Vieira, A. M. (2015). Ensino de inovação na formação do administrador brasileiro: Contribuições para gestores de curso. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 16(1), 101-139.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2), 115–142. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00196-2.
Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582–595. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12116.
Smith, N. C., Drumwright, M. E., & Gentile, M. C. (2010). The new marketing myopia. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29(1), 4–11. doi: http://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.29.1.4.
Sousa, D., Veroneze, R. B., Zambalde, A. L., & Bermejo, P. H. d. S. (2015). Relations between marketing and innovation in Brazilian universities. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9265, 379–389.
Stal, E., & Fujino, A. (2016). The evolution of universities’ relations with the business sector in Brazil: What national publications between 1980 and 2012 reveal. Revista de Administração (São Paulo), 51(1), 72–86. doi: http://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1224.
Veroneze, R. B. (2016). Marketing desde a pesquisa até a comercialização de tecnologias em universidades: Um estudo multicaso. (Dissertação de mestrado), Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brasil.
Veroneze, R. B., Zambalde, A. L., Sousa, D. d., & Rennó, A. S. (2017). As relações entre a universidade e o mercado sob a perspectiva do marketing: Uma revisão sistemática de literatura. Revista Foco, 10(1), 195–220.
Weckowska, D. M. (2015). Learning in university technology transfer offices: Transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation, 41–42, 62–74. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.11.003.
Wirtz, J., Tuzovic, S., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). The role of marketing in today’s enterprises. Journal of Service Management, 25(2), 171–194.
How to Cite