Can Latin America Move Forward after a Lost Decade in Technical Change? …Looking at Opportunities for Knowledge-based Change in Times of Increasing Uncertainty


  • Manuel Heitor Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, IN+, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon
  • Hugo Horta Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, IN+, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Rosario Castañón Centro de Ciencias Aplicadas y Desarrollo Tecnológico, UNAM, México
  • Roberto Sbragia Center for Technology Management and Policy, PGT; School of Economics and Management, FEA, University of São Paulo, USP, Brazil.
  • Alejandro Jiménez School of Economics and Business, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Chile



technical change, innovation policy, Latin America, science policies, international cooperation, special issue


In view of the current global context, which challenges are facing science- and technology-based developments and cooperation in a way to contribute for policies that stimulate localized learning, innovation and endogenous development in Latin America?

This broad question has motivated the work behind the Special Issue introduced by this paper, which considers the development of case studies in selected Latin America regions. The analysis lead us to argue that value-based networks have the potential to make both public policies and markets more effective, promoting learning trajectories for the inclusive development of regions. But they require effective public investments to keep attracting and qualifying human resources, together with long-term developments towards technical industries and export capacity for emerging markets worldwide. Our analysis argues about the unique potential for further developing Latin America through strategic international, knowledge-based ventures, exploring the emerging role the internationalization of universities and scientific institutions may play at a global level. Above all, they require the systematic observation of science and technical change in international comparison, as well as a relational infrastructure for collective action, at an international level, in a context much influenced by a dynamic of change and a necessary balance between the creation and diffusion of knowledge towards the endogenous development of all parts involved. The role of Latin America Universities and science policies based on international cooperation are considered to be particularly important in this process.


Download data is not yet available.


Aghion, P., Julian Boulanger, J. and Cohen, E. (2011), “Rethinking Industrial Policy”, Bruegel Policy Brief, June 2011

Altbach, P. G., and Knight, J. (2007), The Internationalization of Higher education: Motivations and Realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 3-4, pp. 290-305.

Altbach, P., Reisberg, L. and Rumbley, L.E. (2009), “Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution”, Paris: UNESCO

Amsden, A. H. (2001), “The Rise of “the Rest” – Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing economies”, Oxford University Press.

Apolinário, V. and Silva, M.L. (ed.) (2011”, “Impacto dos grandes projectos federais sobre os Estados do Nordeste”, EDUFRN, Natal.

Berger, S. (2013), “Production in the Innovation Economy”, MIT Press, 2013

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P. and Pinch, T. (1987), “The social construction of technological systems”, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Cassiolato, J.E., Matos, M.P. and Lastres, H.M.M. (ed.) (2008), “Arranjos Produtivos Locais – Uma alternativa para o desenvolvimento”, vol. 2 - Experiências de Política, E-papers, Rio de Janeiro.

Castro, C and Castro, L.B. (2012), “Do pensamento renegado ao desafio sinocêntrico – Reflexões de António Barros de Castro sobre o Brasil”, Campus.

Clark, B. R. (1998), “Creating Entrepreneurial University: Organizational Pathways of Transformation”, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Cooke, P. and Huggins, R. (1996), University-Industry Relations in Wales. Working Paper. Center for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences, UWCC.

Conceição, P., and Heitor, M.V. (2002), Knowledge Interaction Towards Inclusive Learning - Promoting Systems of Innovation and Competence Building, Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 69, 7, pp. 641-651.

Conceição, P., Heitor, M.V., Sirilli, G. and Wilson, R. (2004), The Swing of the Pendulum from public to market support for science and technology: is the US leading the way? Technological Forescasting and Social Change, 71, 5, pp. 553-578

Conceição, P., Heitor, M.V. and Horta, H. (2006), R&D funding in US universities: from public to private support or public policies strengthening diversification? in Enders, Jurgen, and Jongbloed, Ben, Public-Private Dynamics in Higher Education: Expectations, Developments and Outcomes, transcript-verlag. Pp. 301-328.

Dixit, A.K. (1998), “The making of economic policy: A transition-cost politics perspective” - Munich lectures in economics, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Ernst, D. and Kim. L. (2002), Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy, 31, 8-9, pp. 1417-1429.

Easterly. W. (2013), “The tyranny od experts – economists, dictators and the forgotten rights of the poor”, Basic Books, New York.

Fingleton, E. (1999), “In Praise of Hard Industries”, Buttonwood Press.

Galbraith, J. (2012), “Inequality and instability – a study of the world economy just before the great crisis”, Oxford University Press.

Gilliot, D. (2001), Incentives in academia In Dewatripont Mathias, Thys-Clemenat, Françoise, and Wilkin, Luc, The Strategic Analysis of Universities: Microeconomic and Management Perspecfives, Brussels, Editions de L’ Université de Bruxelles, pp. 57-71.

Ghani, E., Kharas, H. (2010), “The Service Revolution”, Economic Premise, The World Bank, May 2010

Heitor, M. V. (2008), A system approach to tertiary education institutions: towards knowledge networks and enhanced societal trust. Science and Public Policy, 35, 8, pp. 607-617.

Heitor, M. V. (2014), How far university global partnerships may facilitate a new era of international affairs and foster political and economic relations?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, acceptted to publication.

Heitor, M. and Bravo, M. (2010), Portugal on the crosstalk of change, facing the shock of the new: People, knowledge and ideas fostering the social fabric to facilitate the concentration of knowledge integrated commun, H.ities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, pp. 218-247.

Hepburn, D. (2011), “Mapping the World’s Changing Industrial Landscape”, The World’s Industrial Transformation Series, IE WIT BP 2011/01, Chatham House, July 2011.

Hidalgo, C. A., Hausmann, R. (2009), “The building blocks of economic complexity”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 26, 10570-10575, 30 June 2009

Horta, H. (2010), The role of the state in the internationalization of universities in catching-up countries: An analysis of the Portuguese higher education system. Higher Education Policy, 23, pp. 63-81.

Horta, H. (2009), Global and national prominent universities: internationalization, competitiveness and the role of the state. Higher Education, 58, 3, pp. 387-405.

Locke, R.M., and Wellhausen, R.L. (2014), “Production in the innovation economy”, Cambridge: MIT Press

Lundvall, B.-Å., (1992), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter Publishers, 1992.

Kim, H. E., and Zhu, M. (2010), Universities as Firms: The case of US Overseas Programs in Clotfelter, Charles T. (Ed.), American Universities in a Global Market, Chicago, Chicago University Press, pp. 163-201.

Knight, J. (2011), Education Hubs: A Fad, a Brand, an Innovation? Journal of Studies in International Education, 15, 3, pp. 221-240.

Marginson, S. (2004), Competition and Markets in Higher Education: a ‘glonacal’ analysis. Policy Futures in Education, 2, 2, pp. 175-244.

Marsh, H. W. (2007), Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective In Raymond P. Perry and John C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence based perspective, New York: Springer, pp. 319–384.

Mazzucato, M. (2013), “The Entrepreneurial State – Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths”, Anthem Press, London.

Michalko, M. (2011), “Creative Thinkering – putting your imagination to work”, New York Library, New York.

McKinsey Global Institute (2012), “Manufacturing the future: The next era of global growth and innovation”; November.

Nairn, A. (2002), “Engines that move markets”, John Wiley and Sons.

NAE (2003), “The Impact of Academic Research on Industrial Performance”, National Academy of Engineering, Washington: NAE Press.

Neave, G. (1995), The stirring of the prince and the silence of the lambs: the changing assumptions beneath higher education policy, reform and society in Dill, David D. and Sporn, Barbara (Eds) Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford, Pergamon. Pp. 54-71.

Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.

Nelson, R. R. (2004), The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33, pp. 455-471.

Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2003), Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge. Minerva, 41, pp. 179–194.

Ostry, S. and Nelson, R. (1995), “Techno-nationalism and techno-globalism: conflict and cooperation”, The Brookings Institution, Washington.

Relman, A. S. (1990), Peer review in scientific journals-What good is it? Western Journal of Medicine, 153, pp. 520-522

Roberts, J. T. and Hite, A.B. (2007), “The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change”, Malden: Blackwell

Rosenberg, N., (2002), Knowledge and Innovation for Economic Development: Should Universities be Economic Institutions? in Conceição, Pedro, Gibson, David V., Heitor, Manuel V., Sirilli, Giorgio, and Veloso, Francisco M., Knowledge for Inclusive Development, Westport: Quorum. Pp. 35-47.

Salles-Filho, S., Avila, F.D., Sepulveda, J. and Colugnati, F.A.B. (2010), Multidimensional assessment of technology and innovation programs: the impact evaluation of INCAGRO-Peru. Research Evaluation, v. 19, p. 1.

Saxenian, A. (1986), “Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Schloegl, C., Gorraiz, J., Bart, C. and Bargmann, M. (2003), Evaluating two Australian university departments: Lessons learned. Scientometrics, 56, 3, pp. 287-299.

Tung, R. L. (2008), Brain circulation, diaspora, and international competitiveness. European Management Journal, 26, pp. 298-304.

UNESCO (2010), Science Report 2010, Unesco, Paris

Vest, C. M. (2007), “The American Research University – from World War II to World Wide Web: Governments, the Private Sector and the emerging Meta-University”, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ziman, J. (1968), Public Knowledge: The Social Dimension of Science, Cambridge University Press

Ziman, J. (1978), Reliable Knowledge: an exploration of the grounds for belief in science, Cambridge University Press

Ziman, J. (2000), Real Science: What it is, and what it means, Cambridge University Press




How to Cite

Heitor, M., Horta, H., Castañón, R., Sbragia, R., & Jiménez, A. (2014). Can Latin America Move Forward after a Lost Decade in Technical Change? …Looking at Opportunities for Knowledge-based Change in Times of Increasing Uncertainty. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(4), 1–19.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.