Innovation and Productivity Across Mexican Manufacturing Firms


  • Flor Brown Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Georgina Alenka Guzmán Chávez Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México



technological efforts, innovation, productivity, CDM model, manufacturing industry, Mexican firms


Following the Crépon-Duguet-Mairesse Model (1998), using a database with 2,078 Mexican manufacturing establishments from 2004 to 2006, adapting available proxy variables and proposing a different productivity estimation, this article sets out: Which is their innovation propensity? Which factors push on their innovation efforts? Are these efforts and the innovation favoring labor productivity? The main findings are: Mexican manufacturing establishments with a higher innovation propensity are the largest, with high technological intensity and market share. Advertising, knowledge appropriability, FDI, TT and access to credit have a positive effect on innovation efforts. Moreover, the innovation effort, together with export levels, FDI and access to technology have influenced the innovation of new processes and/or designs, particularly in local firms as compared to foreign firms. Finally, the variables: innovation, labour remunerations and capital intensity have a substantial effect on labor productivity and at a lower level market share, FDI and total quality control.


Download data is not yet available.


Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in Large and Small Firms: an Empirical Analysis, The American Economic Review, Vol. 78 (4), 678-690.

Alvarez, R., Bravo-Ortega, C. and Navarro, L. (2011). Innovation, R&D investment and productivity in Chile, Cepal Review, (No. 140), 135-160.

Amemiya, T. (1984). Tobit models: A survey, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 24 (1–2), 3–61.

Archibugi, D. and Pianta, M. (1996). Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys, Technovation, Vol. 16 (9), 451-468.

Arora, A. (2009). Intellectual property rights and the international transfer of technology: setting out an agenda for empirical research in developing countries, The Economics of Intellectual Property. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in Groves, H., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 609-626.

Arza, V. and López, A. (2010). Innovation and Productivity in the Argentine Manufacturing Sector, IDB Working paper series, No. IDB-WP-187, August, 2010.

Askenazy, P., Breda, T. and Irac, D. (2010). Advertising and R&D. Theory and evidence from France, Paris: Paris School of Economics and Paris Jourdan Sciences Economics. WP. No. 2010-45.

Benavente, J. (2006). The role of research and innovation in promoting productivity in Chile, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, No. 15, 301–315.

Boyer, R. and Didier, M.. (1998). Innovation et croissance. Paris: Conseil d’Analyse économique, La documentation Française.

Brown, F. and Dominguez, L. (2013). La productividad, reto de la industria mexicana. Comercio Exterior, Vol. 63 (3), 12-23.

Brown, F. and Minian, I. (1998). Las redes inter-firma de proveedores innovadores: ¿están presentes en la industria de autopartes mexicana? Investigación Económica, Vol. LVIII (224), 91-118.

Cameron, A. C., and Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Cassoni A. and Ramada, M. (2010). Innovation, R&D investment and productivity: Uruguayan manufacturing firms, IDB Working paper series, No. IDB-WP-191, August, 2010.

Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R & D, The Economic Journal, No. 99, 569-596.

Crepon B., Duguet, E., and Mairesse, J. (1998). Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, No. 7, 115-158.

Crespi, G. and Zúñiga, P. (2012). Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries, World Development, No. 40, 273–290.

De Bondt, R. (1997). Spillovers and Innovative Activities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, No. 15, 1-28.

Dussel, E., Galindo, L., and Loria, E. (2003). Condiciones y efectos de la inversión extranjera directa y del proceso de integración regional en México durante los noventa. Una perspectiva macro, meso y micro. Mexico: Plaza y Valdés.

Girma, S. A. and Gorg, H. B. (2007). Multinationals Productivity Advantage: Scale or Technology? Economic Inquiry, No. 45, 350-362.

Griliches, Z. (1964). Research Expenditures, Education and the Agreggate Production Function. American Economic Review, No. 54, 961-974.

————. (1980). Returns to research and development expenditures in the private sector. New developments in productivity measurement and analysis. Conference on Research in Income and Wealth: Studies in Income and Wealth. Chicago: University of Chicago/Press National Bureau of Economic Research.

Griliches, Z and Mairesse, J. (1984). Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level. in I.Z. Griliches (editor), R&D Patents and Productivity. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Guzmán-Chavez, A., López-Herrera, F. and Venegas-Martinez, F. (2012). Un análisis de cointegración entre patentes y crecimiento económico en México, 1980-2008. Investigación Económica, 71 (281), 83-115.

Hall, B. H., Mairesse, J. and Mohnen, P. (2010). Measuring the Returns to R&D. in Hall, B.H. and N. Rosenberg (editors), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier.

Hall, B. H. and Mairesse, J. (2011). Empirical Studies of Innovation in the Knowledge-driven Economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, No. 15, 289-299.

Heckman, J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.

Heckman, J. (1978). Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica, 46, 931–959.

Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47 (1), 153–61.

INEGI. (2005). Censos Industriales. Mexico: INEGI.

INEGI. (2003), (2004), (2005). Encuesta Industrial Anual (EIA). Mexico: INEGI.

INEGI. (2005). Encuesta Nacional de Empleo, Salarios, Tecnología y Capacitación (ENESTYC). Mexico: INEGI.

Janz, N., Lööf, H. and Peters, B. (2004). Innovation and Productivity in German and Swedish Manufacturing Firms: Is there a Common Story? Problems & perspectives in management, No. 2, 184-204.

Johnson, D. K. (2002). Learning by licensing: R&D and Technology Licensing in Brazilian Invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 11 (3), 163-177.

Kaiser, U. (2002). An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research coperation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, No. 20, 747-774.

Kamien, M. I. and Schwartz, N.L. (1982). Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kamien, M. I. and Zang, I. (2000). Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. XVIII (18), 995-1012.

Katrack, H. (1997). Developing countries’ imports of technology, in-house technological capabities and efforts: an analysis of the Indian experience. Journal of Development Economics, No. 53, 67-83.

Kumar, N. and Aggarwal, A. (2005). Liberalization, outward orientation and in-house R&D activity of multinational and local firms: A quantitative exploration for Indian manufacturing. Research Policy, No. 34, 441–460.

Lööf, H. and Heshmati, A. (2006). On the Relationship Between Innovation and Performance: a Sensitivity Analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, No. 15, 317–344.

Mairesse, J. and Robin, S. (2009). Innovation and productivity: a firm-level analysis for French Manufacturing and Services using CIS3 and CIS4 data (1998-2000 and 2002-2004). Paris: CREST-ENSAE.

Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L. (1997). Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6 (1), 83-117.

Mendonça S., Santos Pereira, P. and Godinhod, M. (2004). Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Research Policy, No. 33, 1385–1404.

Mohnen P., Mairesse, J. and Dagenais, M. (2006). Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, No. 15, 391–413.

Monge-González, R., Rodríguez-Álvarez, J., Hewitt, J., Orozco, J. and Ruíz, K. (2010). Innovation and Employment Growth in Costa Rica. A Firm-Level Analysis. IDB Technical Notes, No. IDB-TN-318.

Mulligan, C. B. and Sala-I-Martin, X. (1995). A labour–income-based measure of the value of Human Capital: an application to the States of the United States. NBER WP 5018, Washington: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Navarro, J. C., Llisterri, J. J. and Zuniga, P. (2010). The importance of ideas: Innovation and productivity in Latin America. in C. Pages-Serra (editor), The Age of Productivity: Transforming Economies from the Bottom Up. Washington: Development in the Americas/ Inter-American Development Bank/Palgrave-McMillan.

Pakes A. and Griliches, Z. (1984). Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look. in Griliches, Z. (editor), R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research, The Universty of Chicago Press, pp. 55-72.

Polder, M., van Leeuwen, G., Mohnen, P. and Raymond, W. (2010). Productivity effects of innovation modes. Holland: Statistics Netherlands, The Hague/Heerlen.

Raffo, J., Lhuillery, S. and Miotti, L. (2008). Northern and southern innovativity: a comparison across European and Latin American countries. The European Journal of Development Research, No. 20, 219–239.

Rogers M., Helmers, C. and Greenhalgh, C. (2007). An analysis of the characteristics of small and medium enterprises that use intellectual property. Manchester College, Oxford University and Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre, October. Retrieved from:

Scherer, F. M. (2005). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. in Patents: Economics, Policy and Measurement. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar, pp. 120-157.

Solow, R. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, No. 39, 312-320.

Therrien, P. and Hanel, P. (2005). Innovation and Productivity: Summary Results for Canadian Manufacturing Establishments. International Productivity Monitor, No. 22, 11-28.

Van Leeuwen, G. and Klomp, L. (2006). On the contribution of innovation to multi-factor productivity growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 15 (4), 367–390.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Zúñiga, M. P., Guzmán, A. and Brown, F. (2007). Technology acquisition strategies in the pharmaceutical industry in Mexico. Comparative TT and Society (CTTS), Vol. 5 (3), 274-296, December.




How to Cite

Brown, F., & Guzmán Chávez, G. A. (2014). Innovation and Productivity Across Mexican Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(4), 36–52.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.