Inbound and Outbound Open Innovation: Organization and Performances
AbstractThe aim of the paper is to analyse the relationships between the openness degree of companies and their 1) context features, 2) R&D organization and 3) financial performances. The openness degree is defined after a pecuniary approach, involving all the transactions in the innovation market. Hypotheses are formulated and, then, tested on a sample of 126 world top R&D spending bio-pharmaceutical companies for the period 2008-2012. Open innovation is more pervasive among small and young companies, for most of which it represents the very core business. Inbound and outbound practices have a similar diffusion in terms of number of companies adopting them, but the cumulative values of inbound flows are higher, whereas outbound flows are more relevant when compared to the total business of the firms. Inbound practices are substitutive to internal R&D activities, while outbound ones are complementary to internal development. The performances of companies have an inverted-U shape trend versus inbound practices and a fundamentally decreasing trend versus outbound ones.
AHN, J. M., Mortara, L., Minshall, T. (2013). The Effects of Open Innovation on Firm Performance: A Capacity Approach. STI Policy Review, 4(1), 74-93. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2328625
BARGE-GIL, A. (2010). Open, semi-open and closed innovators: towards an explanation of degree of openness. Industry and Innovation, 17(6), 577-607. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2010.530839
BIANCHI, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F., Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisational modes for open innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: an exploratory analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22-33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002
CHESBROUGH, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
CHESBROUGH, H., Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high-tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229-236. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
CHIARONI, D., Chiesa, V., Frattini, F. (2008). Patterns of collaboration along the bio-pharmaceutical innovation process. Journal of Business Chemistry, 5(1), 7-22. Available at http://www.businesschemistry.org/article/?article=45
CHIARONI, D., Chiesa, V., Frattini, F. (2009). Investigating the adoption of open innovation in the biopharmaceutical industry: a framework and an empirical analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 285-305. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601060910974192
COHEN, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393553
COOKE, P. (2005). Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation exploring “Globalisation 2” - a new model of industry organization. Research Policy, 34(8), 1128-1149. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.005
DAHLANDER, L., Gann, D. M. (2007). How open is innovation?. Paper Presented at the DRUID Summer Conference. 18 June 2007. Copenhagen, Denmark.
DAHLANDER, L., Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation?. Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
DODGSON, M., Gann, D. M., Salter, A. (2006). The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Management, 36(3), 333-346. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x
ENKEL, E., Lenz, A. (2009). Open innovation metrics system. Paper Presented at the R&D Management Conference. 21-24 June 2009. Vienna, Austria.
FAEMS, D., de Visser, M., Andries, P., van Looy, B. (2010). Technology alliance portfolios and financial performance: value-enhancing and cost-increasing effects of open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 785-796. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00752.x
FETTERHOFF, T. J., Voelkel, D. (2006). Managing open innovation in biotechnology. Research-Technology Management, 49(3), 14-18. Available at http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iri/rtm/2006/00000049/00000003/art00003
GASSMANN, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Management, 36(3), 223-228. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.x
GASSMANN, O., Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes. Paper Presented at the R&D Management Conference. 6-9 July 2004. Lisbon, Portugal.
GASSMANN, O., Reepmeyer, G., von Zedtwitz, M. (2008). Leading Pharmaceutical Innovation: Trends and Drivers for Growth in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Springer, Berlin.
HUIZINGH, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2-9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
HUNG, K.-P., Chiang, Y.-H. (2010). Open innovation proclivity, entrepreneurial orientation, and perceived firm performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 52(3-4), 257-274. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1504/IJTM.2010.035976
HWANG, J., Lee, Y. (2010). External knowledge search, innovative performance and productivity in the Korean ICT sector. Telecommunications Policy, 34(10), 562-571. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.04.004
IDRISSIA, M. O., Amaraa, N., Landrya, R. (2012). SMEs’ Degree of Openness: The Case of Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(1), 186-210. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000100013
ILI, S., Albers, A., Miller, S. (2010). Open innovation in the automotive industry. R&D Management, 40(3), 246-255. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00595.x
INAUEN, M., Schenker-Wicki, A. (2011). The impact of outside-in open innovation on innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 496-520. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601061111174934
JU, P.-H., Chen, D.-N., Yu, Y.-C., Wei, H.-L. (2013). Relationships among Open Innovation Processes, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Organizational Performance of SMEs: The Moderating Role of Technological Turbulence. In: Kobylinski, A., Sobczak, A. (Eds.), Perspectives in Business Informatics Research - 12th International Conference, BIR 2013, Warsaw, Poland, September 23-25. Proceedings, Springer, pp. 140-160.
KATZ, R., Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7-20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x
KEUPP, M. M., Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&D Management, 39(4), 331-341. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00563.x
KLEYN, D., Kitney, R., Atun, R. (2007). Partnership and innovation in the life sciences. International Journal of Innovation Management, 11(2), 323-347. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1363919607001722
KUMAR, N., Saqib, M. (1996). Firm size, opportunities for adaptation and in-house R&D activity in developing countries: the case of Indian manufacturing. Research Policy, 25(5), 713-722. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00854-3
LAURSEN, K., Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/smj.507
LAZZAROTTI, V., Manzini, R., Pellegrini, L. (2010). Open innovation models adopted in practice: an extensive study in Italy. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(4), 11-23. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13683041011093721
LEE, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs - An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290-300. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
MICHELINO, F., Lamberti, E., Cammarano, A., Caputo, M. (2014a). Measuring open innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry. Creativity and Innovation Management (Article in Press). doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/caim.12072
MICHELINO, F., Cammarano, A., Lamberti, E., Caputo, M. (2014b). Open models for innovation of leading companies in high competitive industries. Proceedings of the 23rd International Business Information Management Association Conference - IBIMA. 13-14 May 2014. Valencia, Spain.
PODMETINA, D., Väätänen, J., Torkkeli, M. T., Smirnova, M. M. (2011). Open innovation in Russian firms: an empirical investigation of technology commercialisation and acquisition. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(3), 298-317. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2011.040100
POWELL, W., White, D., Koput, K., Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1132-1205. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/421508
SANDULLI, F. D., Fernandez-Menendez, J., Rodriguez-Duarte, A., Lopez-Sanchez, J. I. (2012). Testing the Schumpeterian hypotheses on an open innovation framework. Management Decision, 50(7), 1222-1232. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1978403
SCHROLL, A., Mild, A. (2011). Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D: An empirical study on open innovation adoption in Europe. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 475-495. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1108/14601061111174925
TEIRLINCK, P., Poelmans, E. (2012). Open innovation and firm performance in small-sized R&D active companies in the chemical industry: the case of Belgium. Journal of Business Chemistry, 9(3), 117-132. Available at http://www.businesschemistry.org/article/?article=160
VAN DE VRANDE, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423-437. doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
VAN DER MEER, H. (2007). Open innovation-the Dutch treat: challenges in thinking in business models. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(2), 192-202. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00433.x
WEST, J., Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, 36(3), 319-331. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x
WIKLUND, J., Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307-1314. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.360
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).