Benefits of University-Industry Cooperation for Innovations of Sustainable Biological Control
AbstractThis study aims to identify the benefits of technological cooperation between the College of Agriculture Luiz de Queiroz – University of São Paulo (Esalq/USP) and the start-up Bug, a company that operates in the biological control of pests as a sustainable alternative to traditional methods. This research was based on a case study regarding a technological cooperation, which resulted in sustainable innovation involving a biological control of pests through the use of a parasite wasp that naturally parasitize the sugarcane borer’s eggs, preventing the growth of caterpillars in field crops. The technological cooperation led the company to extend its cooperation to other educational and research institutions.
BABBIE, E. (1998). The practice of social research. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont.
BARBIERI, J. C., Vasconcelos, I. F. G. de, Andreassi, T., Vasconcelos, F. C. de. (2010). Inovação e sustentabilidade: novos modelos e proposições. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 50(2), 146-154.
BENEDETTI, M. H.,Torkomian, A. L. V.(2010). Uma análise da influência da cooperação Universidade-Empresa sobre a inovação tecnológica. Gestão & Produção. 17(4), 145-158.
BERCOVITZ, J., Feldmann, M. (2006). Entrepreneurial universities and technology transfer: a conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175-188.
BRADLEY, S. R., Hayter, C. S., Link, A. N. (2013). Models and methods of university technology transfer. The working papers of the Department of Economics at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 13(10). http://bae.uncg. edu/econ/research/working-papers/ [Accessed November 15, 2013]
CLOSS, L. Q., Ferreira, G. C. (2012). A transferência de tecnologia universidade-empresa no contexto brasileiro: uma revisão de estudos científicos publicados entre os anos 2005 e 2009. Gestão & Produção, 19(2), 419-432.
COSTA, P. R. da, Porto, G. S., Feldhaus, D. (2010). Gestão da cooperação empresa-universidade: o caso de uma multinacional brasileira. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 14(1), 100-121.
DI GREGORIO, D., Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209-227.
EISENHARDT, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532550.
ETZKOWITZ, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-23.
FLICK, U. (2004). Uma introdução à pesquisa qualitativa. Bookman, Porto Alegre.
FREEMAN, C. (1995). The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.
GRIMPE, C., Fier, H. (2010). Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 637-650.
KANTER, R. M. (1999). From spare change to real change: the social sector as beta site for business innovation. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 122-132.
LIDSKY, D. (2012). Most innovative companies. 33 Bug agentes biológicos. for breeding a natural alternative to harmful agricultural pesticides. Fast Company. http://www. fastcompany.com//3017467/most-innovative-companies2012/33bug-agentes-biologicos. [Accessed August 15, 2013].
LUNDVALL, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers, London.
MENDES, L., Amorim-Borher, B., Lage, C. (2013). Patent applications on representative sectors of biotechnology in Brazil: an analysis of the last decade. Journal of Technology and Management Innovation, 8(4), 91-102.
MINAYO, M. C. de S., Deslandes, S. F., Neto, O. C., Gomes, R. (1994). Pesquisa social: teoria, método e criatividade. Vozes, Petrópolis.
MOTTA E., Albuquerque, E. da (2004). Idéias fundadoras. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 3(1), 9-13.
NIDUMOLU, R, Prahalad, C. K. ,Rangaswami, M. R. (2009).
Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56-94.
O’SHEA, R. P., Allen, T. J.; Chevalier, A., Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34 (7), 994-1009.
SÁBATO, J., Botana, N. (1968). La ciência y la tecnologia en el futuro de América Latina. Revista de La Integración, 1(3), 15-36.
SELLTIZ, C., Wrightsman, L. S., Cook, S. W. (1974). Métodos de pesquisa nas relações sociais. Ed. Pedagógica e Universitária Ltda., São Paulo.
UNEP–UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT
PROGRAMME (2007). Annual Report 2007. http://www. unep.org/PDF/AnnualReport/2007/AnnualReport2007_en_ web.pdf. [Accessed November, 8, 2013].
UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO (2013). Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz. http://www.esalq.usp.br/. Accessed March 4, 2013.
VALENTE, L. (2010). Hélice tríplice: metáfora dos anos 90 descreve bem o mais sustentável modelo de sistema de inovação. Conhecimento & Inovação, 6(1), 6-9.
WEF–WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM (2014). Reports: technology pioneers. http://reports.weforum.org/ technology-pioneers-2014/company-profiles/bug-agentesbiologicos/ [Accessed August 15, 2013].
YIN, R. K. (2001). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Bookman, Porto Alegre.
ZUCKER, L. G., Darby, M. R. (2001). Capturing technological opportunity via Japan’s star scientists: evidence from Japanese firms’ biotech patents and products. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 37-58.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).