Catching the Runaway Train – Innovation Management in Russian Railways
This paper studies the innovation strategy of Russian Railways, the biggest transport company in the world. Russian Railways has chosen a strategy of international science, technology and innovation (STI) cooperation outside their own network. This strategy is a novel approach for Russian State-owned enterprises (SOE). Based on the analysis of innovation development program and interviews with managers, the paper studies the company’s experience with the chosen strategy. Thereby, the paper enhances the understanding of innovation processes in major public service companies which are crucial for the socio-economic processes inside and outside national boundaries.
AGHION, P., HOWITT, P. (1990). A model of growth through creative destruction (No. w3223). National Bureau of Economic Research.
AMSDEN, A. (1989). Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. Oxford University Press, New York.
BARKEMA, H. G., Shenkar, O., Vermeulen, F. and Bell, J. H. (1997). Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Academy of Management journal, 40(2), pp. 426-442.
BROWN, S. L., Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 42, pp. 1-34.
CHEN, L.-Ch. (2009). Learning through informal local and global linkages: The case of Taiwan's machine tool industry. Research Policy, 38(3), pp. 527-535.
CHESBROUGH, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
CHIANG, J.-T. (1989). Technology and alliance strategies for follower countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 35(4), pp. 339-349.
CHOI, D., Valikangas, L. (2001). Patterns of strategy innovation. European Management Journal, 19(4), pp. 424-429.
COHEN, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 35(1), pp. 128-152.
DOBSON, W., Safarian, A.E. (2008). The transition from imitation to innovation: An enquiry into China's evolving institutions and firm capabilities. Journal of Asian Economics, 19(4), pp. 301-311.
EISENHARDT, K. M., Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic management journal, 21(10-11), pp. 1105-1121.
ENKEL, E., Gassmann, O. (2010). Creative imitation: exploring the case of cross‐industry innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), pp. 256-270.
GASSMANN, O. (2006). Opening up the innovation process: towards an agenda. R&D Management, 36(3), pp. 223-228.
HAGEDOORN, J., Schakenraad, J. (1994). The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic management journal, 15(4), pp. 291-309.
KIM, L. (1997). Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
LAURSEN, K., Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic management journal, 27(2), pp. 131-150.
LEONARD-BARTON, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13, pp. 111-125.
MALAGAS, K., Kourousis, K., Baxter, G., Nikitakos, N., Gritzalis, S. (2013). The Introduction of Innovative Services in a State Owned Airline: A Case Study of an IT Migration Project, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 8(2), pp. 74-83.
MANSFIELD, E. (1988). Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: A comparative study. The American Economic Review, 78(2), pp. 223-228.
NELSON, R.R., Winter, S.G. (1982). An Evolutionary Model of Economic Change. Cambridge. Mass: Harvard University Press.
NIOSI, J. (1999). The Internationalization of Industrial RD-Fr. Research Policy, 28(2), pp. 107-118.
PILLER, F. T., Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D management, 36(3), pp. 307-318.
PRAHALAD, C. K., Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Boston (MA).
ROMER, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), pp. 71-102.
ROSENBERG, N. (1994). Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England.
ROY, S., Sivakumar, K., and Wilkinson, I. F. (2004). Innovation generation in supply chain relationships: a conceptual model and research propositions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), pp. 61-79.
SCHEWE, G. (1996). Imitation as a strategic option for external acquisition of technology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 13(1), pp. 55-82.
TEECE, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), pp. 1319-1350.
TEECE, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), pp. 509-533.
VON HIPPEL, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
WANG, C. L., Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), pp. 31-51.
ZOLLO, M., Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization science, 13(3), pp. 339-351.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).