Understanding the Impact of Project Risk Management on Project Performance: An Empirical Study
Keywords:Project risk management, project typologies, project complexity, innovation management
AbstractThe goal of this study is to comprehend the impact of risk management on project performance. Further it aims to investigate the degree of diffusion of risk management practice in Brazilian companies. The methodological approach involves a survey of 415 projects at different levels of complexity in different industrial sectors in several states of Brazil. The results demonstrate that adopting risk management practices has a significant positive impact on project success. They also show a positive impact from the presence of a risk manager on project success. The study’s principal limitations are the methodological choice of non probability sampling and a questionnaire based on respondent perception. From the practical point of view, paying attention to uncertainties during the project, making use of the risk management techniques and deeply understand the business environment are critical success factors, demanding attention of project managers and risk managers. The results demonstrate the impact of risk management practices on project success. They also show a positive impact from the presence of a risk manager on project success. Furthermore, it demonstrated the importance of soft skill in risk management.
AKINTOYE, A.S., MACLEOD, M.J. (1997), Risk analysis and management in Construction. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 15 No 1, pp. 1-38.
BAKKER, K. DE, BOONSTRA, A., WORTMANN, H. (2010), Does risk management contribute to IT project success? A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 28 No 5, pp. 493-503.
BAKKER, K. DE, BOONSTRA, A., WORTMANN, H. (2012), Risk managements' communicative effects influencing IT project success. International Journal of Project Management Vol. 30, pp. 444–457
BERNSTEIN, P.L. (1998), Desafio aos deuses: a fascinante história do risco. Campus, Rio de Janeiro.
BESNER, C., HOBBS, B. (2006), The perceived value and potential contribution of project management practices to project success. Project Management Journal, Vol. 37 No 3, pp. 37-48.
CARVALHO, M.M., RABECHINI JR., R. (2011), Fundamentos em Gestão de Projetos: Construindo Competências para Gerenciar Projetos. Atlas, São Paulo.
CLARK, R.C., PLEDGER, M., NEEDLER, H.M.J. (1990), Risk analysis in the evaluation of non-aerospace projects. Risk Management, Vol. 8 No 1, pp. 17-24.
DOD 5000.2-R, 2002. Mandatory Procedures for Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPS) and Major Automated Information Systems (MAIS).
EISENHARDT, K.M. (1989), Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No 4, pp. 532-550.
HAIR JR., J.F., TATHAM, R.L., ANDERSON, R., BLACK, W.
(2009), Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
HILLSON, D. (2002), Extending the risk process to manage opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 20 No 3, pp. 235-240.
IBBS, C.W., KWAK, Y.H. (2000), Assessing project management maturity. Project Management Journal, Vol. 31 No 1, pp. 32-43.
KEELLING, R. (2006), Gestão de projetos: uma abordagem global. Saraiva, São Paulo.
LAWRENCE, P.R., LORSCH, J.W. (1967), Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Harvard Business School Classics, Boston.
MEYER, A. DE, LOCH, C.H., PICH, M.T. (2002), Managing Project Uncertainty: From Variation to Chaos. MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 43 No 2, pp. 60+.
MODARRES, M. (2006), Risk analysis in engineering: techniques, tools, and trends. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton.
OKOLI, C., PAWLOWSKI, S.D. (2004), The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, Vol. 42 No 1, pp. 15-24.
PERMINOVA, O., GUSTAFSSON, M., WIKSTROM, K. (2008), Defining uncertainty in projects – a new perspective. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26, pp. 73-79.
RAZ, T., SHENHAR, A.J., DVIR, D. (2002), Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty. R&D Management, Vol. 32 No 2, pp. 101-109.
ROPPONEN, J., LYYTINEN, K. (2000), Components of Software Development Risk : How to Address Them ? A Project Manager Survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 26 No 2, pp. 98-112.
SAUSER, B.J., REILLY, R.R., SHENHAR, A.J. (2009), Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights – A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 27 No 7, pp. 665-679.
SHENHAR, A.J., DVIR, D. (2010), Reinventando gerenciamento de projetos – A abordagem diamante ao crescimento e inovação bem-sucedidos. M. Books, Harvard Business School Press.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSIVE, 2006. Risk management guide for DOD acquisition. DOD.
WARD, S., CHAPMAN, C. (2003), Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21 No 2, pp. 97-105.
WIDEMAN, R.M. (1992), Project and Program risk management: a guide to managing project risks and opportunities. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square.
ZWIKAEL, O., AHN, M. (2011), The effectiveness of risk management: an analysis of project risk planning across industries and countries. Risk analysis, Vol. 31 No 1, pp. 25-37.
Zwikael, O., Globerson, S. (2006), From Critical Success Factors to Critical Success Processes. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 44 No 17, pp. 3433-3449.
ZWIKAEL, O., SADEH, A. (2007), Planning effort as an effective risk management tool. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25 No 4, pp. 755-767.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).