The Co-evolution of Business Incubators and National Incubator Networks in Emerging Markets

David F. Robinson

Abstract


The study proposes a three stage model of the development of business incubation practices in emerging markets. The model addresses the diffusion of incubation practices to new markets, the institutionalization of those practices and the co-evolution of incubators and national networks of incubation. The model is based on interviews conducted in Bolivia, Peru, Chile, Argentina, and Brazil. New incubators in emerging markets often face strong cultural norms and institutional impediments to helping entrepreneurs start new businesses. As incubation becomes better established in a country, incubators provide more advanced technical, legal and market-based advice. Networks of incubators form to share specialized services across many incubators, to allocate government funding to incubators, and to lobby for public and private support of innovation.

Keywords


Business Incubation; Co-evolution; Institutional Theory; Innovation; Networks; Development; South America

Full Text:

PDF [en]

References


BORDENAVE, J. (1976) Communication of Agricultural Innovations in Latin America. Communication Research, 3(2), 135-154.

COHEN, W., Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.

CANTWELL, J., Dunning, J., Lundan, S. (2010). An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 567-586.

DIMAGGIO, P., Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.

ETZKOWITZ, H., Mello, J., Almeida, M. (2005). Towards "meta-innovation" in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 34, 411-424.

GRILICHES, Z. (1957). Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica, 25(4), 501-522.

HACKETT, S., Dilts, D. (2004). A systematic review of business incubation research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55-82.

iDISC Papers. (2003, October). Infodev/iDISC Regional workshop for business incubators in Latin America and the Carribean. Brasilia.

LEVINTHAL, D., March, J. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2, 307-333.

MARCH J. (1981) Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. In: A. Van de Ven and W. Joyce (Eds.) Perspectives on organization design and behavior, 205-244, Wiley, New York.

MINER, A., Haunschild, P. (1995). Population level learning. In L.L. Cummings, B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 115-166. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.

NELSON, R. (Ed.). (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York.

NELSON, R., Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

ROBINSON, D., Miner, A. (1996). Careers change as organizations learn. In: M. Arthur, D. Rousseau (Eds.), The Boundaryless Career: a new employment principle for a new organizational era. Oxford University Press, New York.

ROGERS, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation (4th ed.). The Free Press, New York.

TEECE, D. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-305.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242010000300001



Copyright (c)



2017 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by Chimera Innova Group