Exogenous Factors in the Development of Flexible Fuel Cars as a Local Dominant Technology

Paulo Tromboni de Souza Nascimento, Abraham Sin Oih Yu, Robson Quinello, Rosaria de Fatima S. Macri Russo, Nigro Francisco, Nilton Cesar Lima

Abstract


With flexible fuel technology, customers can choose among gasoline, ethanol, or any mix thereof at the fuel station pump. This paper presents the endogenous and exogenous factors that influnced the development of a flexible fuel electronic injection system by Magneti Marelli Automotive Systems Brazil – the first to the market. This software-based technological architecture, launched commercially in 2003, is now the dominant flexfuel design in the Brazilian market. This article documents the emergence of a local dominant technology (design) in a specific car sub-system. It is shown how exogenous institutional factors played the major role in this process. The paper describes how this local dominant technological design emerged through the sharing of capabilities and interaction among the key market players, in the absence of a strong appropriability regime. All the main market pioneers were multinational affiliates, inviting questions concerning this technology diffusion outside Brazil.

Keywords


automotive industry; biofuels; ethanol; local dominant design; power train technology.

Full Text:

PDF [en]

References


ALVES, M. de L. (2007). Carro Flex Fuel: uma avaliação por opções reais. Master's Dissertation. Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 94 f.

ANDERSON, P., Tushman, M.L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quartely, 35, 604-633.

ANFAVEA - Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores (2008). http://www.anfavea.com.br [Retrieved from the Web 08/22/2008]

BEISE, M. (2004) Lead markets: country-specific drivers of the global diffusion of innovations. Research Policy, 33, 997-1018.

BROWN, S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. (1995) Product development - past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Re view, 20 (2), 343-378.

CASTRO, A. C., Korter C. H, Franieck E. K. (1994). Flexible ethanol otto engine management system, in Papers presented at III Congresso e Exposição Internacionais de Tecnologia da Mobilidade – SAE Brasil [CD-ROM], São Paulo.

DOSI, G. (1982). Technological Paradigms and Trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147-162.

EISENHARDT, K.M., Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges, Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1), 25-32.

HILL, C. W. L., Rothaermel F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28 (2), 257-274.

KAPLAN, S., F. Murray, R. Henderson (2003). Discontinuities and senior management: assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (4), 203-233.

KRISHNAN, V., Ulrich K. T. (2001). Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Science, 47 (1), 1-21.

MEIJER, I. S. M., Hekkert M. P., Koppenjan J.F.M. (2007). How perceived uncertainties influence transitions; the case of micro-CHP in the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74 (4), 519-537.

MM - Magneti Marelli Sistemas Automotivos (2009). http://www.magnetimarelli.com/english/il_gruppo.php [Retrieved from the Web 01/26/2009]

MURPHY, S. A.; Kumar, V. (1997) The Front End of New Product Development: a Canadian Survey. R D Management, 27 (1), 5-15.

OICA - Organisation Internationale des Constructeurs d'Automobiles (2008). http://www.oica.net/ [Retrieved from the Web 11/10/2008]

ORSATO, R. J., Wells, P. (2007), U-turn: the rise and demise of the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (11-12), 994-1006.

ROZEN, M. (2007). O Einstein automotivo, AUTODATA, n. 15, special edition, 12-18.

SCHILLING, M. A. (1998). Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 267-284.

SRINIVASAN, R., Lilien G. L.,Rangaswamy A. (2006). The emergence of dominant designs. Journal of Marketing, 70 (2), 1-17.

SUAREZ, F. F. (2004). Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework. Research Policy, 33, 271-286.

YIN, R. K. (2001). Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e Métodos. Bookman, Rio de Janeiro




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242009000400009



Copyright (c)



2017 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias