La Relación entre las Estrategias de Innovación: Coexistencia o Complementariedad

Jaider Manuel Vega Jurado, Antonio Gutiérrez-Gracia, Ignacio Fernández-de-Lucio

Abstract


This paper explores the relationships between internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition as business innovation strategies. Drawing on absorptive capacity framework (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990), we distinguish and empirically evaluate two possible relationships: coexistence and complementarity. The analysis is based on a large sample of manufacturing firms taken from the Spanish Survey of Technological Innovation 2004. Our results show coexistence between internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition but they do not provide evidence that these activities are complementary with respect to influencing innovation performance. In other words, although our results suggest that internal R&D activities are associated with a greater use of external knowledge sourcing strategies, they do not seem to have synergistic effects to develop new products.

Keywords


External knowledge acquisition; internal R&D; complementarity; coexistence.

Full Text:

PDF [es]

References


ARORA, A. (1996). Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions. Economics Letter 50, 51-55.

ARORA, A., Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics 38, 361-379.

ARORA, A., Gambardella, A. (1994). Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability and external linkages in biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 24, 91-114.

ATHEY, S., Stern, S. (1998). An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. NBER working paper 6600.

BARNEY, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99-120.

BAYONA, C., Garcia-Marco, T., Huerta, E. (2001). Firms' motivations for cooperative R&D: an empirical analysis of Spanish firms. Research Policy 30, 1289-1307.

BECKER, W., Dietz, J. (2004). R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms-evidence for the German industry. Research Policy 33, 209-223.

CASSIMAN, B., Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 52, 68-82.

CASTRO, E., Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2006). La I+D empresarial y sus relaciones con la investigación pública española. En: Sebastián, J., Muñoz, E. (eds.), Radiografía de la investigación pública en España. Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid.

COHEN, W., Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128-152.

FORAY, D., Mowery, D (1990). L'integration de la R &D industrielle: nouvelles perspectives d'analyse. Reveu Economique 3.

FREEMAN, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy 20, 499-514

HOETKER, G. (2007). The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: critical issues. Strategic Management Journal 28, 331-453.

KAISER, U. (2002). An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: evidence for the German service sector. Research Policy 20, 747-774.

LAURSEN, K., Salter, A. (2006). Open for Innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovative performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27, 131-150.

LOWE, J., Taylor, P. (1998). R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets. R&D Management 28, (4), 263-278.

MILGROM, P., Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. American Economic Review 80, 511-528.

MOWERY, D.C. (1983). The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940. Exploration in Economics History 20, 351-374.

MOWERY, D.C., Rosenberg, N. (1989), Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

PAVITT, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change. Research Policy 13, 343-373

TEECE D., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18, (7), 509-533.

VEGA-JURADO, J., Gutierrez-Gracia, A., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., Manjarrés-Henríquez, L. (2008a). The effect of external and internal factors on firms' product innovation. Research Policy 37, 616-632.

VEGA-JURADO, J., Gutiérrez Gracia, A., Fernández de Lucio, I. (2008b). ¿Cómo innovan las empresas españolas? Una evidencia empírica. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 3, 100-111

VEUGELERS, R. (1997). Internal R&D expenditures and external te chnology sourcing. Research Policy 26, 303-31




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242009000300007



Copyright (c)



2017 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by Chimera Innova Group