A leadership competency model of science and technology parks: the case of Chungbuk Techno Park in Korea

Kyoung-Joo Lee, Eun-Young Kim

Abstract


Given their significant regional economic benefits, science and technology parks (STPs) have attracted continuous academic attention. To understand the predictors of performance of STPs, this study focuses on the critical impacts of leaders and develops a leadership competency model specialized for public STP leaders. The competency model identifies the qualities and conditions of an effective leader of public STPs, emphasizing management skills, bottom-up approach, and boundary spanning skills. To provide empirical support, this study adopts the case study approach and performs a behavior event interview with one of the most successful leaders of public STPs in Korea.

Keywords


leadership; competency model; boundary spanning; incubator.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albahari, A., Catalano, G., & Landoni, P. (2013). Evaluation of national science park systems: a theoretical framework and its application to the Italian and Spanish systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(5), 599-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.785508

Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of management review, 2(2), 217-230.

Alldredge, M. E., & Nilan, K. J. (2000). 3M's leadership competency model: An internally developed solution. Human Resource Management, 39(2, 3), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-050X(200022/23)39:2/3%3C133::AID-HRM4%3E3.0.CO;2-8

Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: A framework. Technovation, 28(1), 20-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.008

Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A. I., Nosella, A., & Petroni, G. (2006). Assessing science parks' performances: directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26(4), 489-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.002

Bøllingtoft, A. (2012). The bottom-up business incubator: Leverage to networking and cooperation practices in a self-generated, entrepreneurial-enabled environment. Technovation, 32(5), 304-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.005

Campion, M. A., Fink, A. A., Ruggeberg, B. J., Carr, L., Phillips, G. M., & Odman, R. B. (2011). Doing competencies well: Best practices in competency modeling. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 225-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01207.x

Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2006). The relative importance of the top management team's managerial skills. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 9-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437720610652817

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549-559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117

Ernst, C., & Chrobot-Mason, D. (2011). Flat world, hard boundaries: How to lead across them. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(3), 1-8.

Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 381-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.005

Halbesleben, J. R., Novicevic, M. M., Harvey, M. G., & Buckley, M. R. (2003). Awareness of temporal complexity in leadership of creativity and innovation: A competency-based model. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 433-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00046-8

Hannon, P. D. (2005). Incubation policy and practice: building practitioner and professional capability. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(1), 57-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14626000510579644

Hollenbeck, G. P., McCall, M. W., & Silzer, R. F. (2006). Leadership competency models. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 398-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.003

Hood, C., & Lodge, M. (2004). Competency, bureaucracy, and public management reform: A comparative analysis. Governance, 17(3), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00248.x

Hu, A. G. (2007). Technology parks and regional economic growth in China. Research Policy, 36(1), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.003

KISTEP (Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning). (2012). Special Evaluation Report on Techno Park Construction Policy (in Korean). KISTEP.

Koontz, T. M., & Newig, J. (2014). From Planning to Implementation: Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Approaches for Collaborative Watershed Management. Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 416-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12067

Lalkaka, R. (1996). Technology business incubators: critical determinants of success. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 798(1), 270-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb24870.x

Lee, K. J. (2014). Development of boundary-spanning organisations in Japanese universities for different types of university–industry collaborations: a resource dependence perspective. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 22(2), 204-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2014.973164

Lee, K. J., Ohta, T., & Kakehi, K. (2010). Formal boundary spanning by industry liaison offices and the changing pattern of university–industry cooperative research: the case of the University of Tokyo. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(2), 189-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537320903498538

Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2003). US science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic missions of universities. International Journal of industrial organization, 21(9), 1323-1356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00085-7

Lucia, A. D., & Lepsinger. R. (1999). Art & Science of Competency Models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Marrelli, A. F., Tondora, J., & Hoge, M. A. (2005). Strategies for developing competency models. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 32(5-6), 533-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-005-3264-0

McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for" intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034092

McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying competencies with behavioral-event interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00065

Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2010). Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 437-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.09.003

Oh, S. H., & Lee. K. J. (2013). Governance System of Governmental R&D Programs: Formation and Transformation of the Framework Act on Science and Technology in Korea. Science and Public Policy (40), 492-503. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct002

Ossenbrink, J., Finnsson, S., Bening, C. R., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2018). Delineating policy mixes: Contrasting top-down and bottom-up approaches to the case of energy-storage policy in California. Research Policy. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.014

Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00055-0

Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.014

Sternberg, R. (2004). Technology centres in Germany: economic justification, effectiveness and impact on high-tech regions. International Journal of Technology Management, 28(3-6), 444-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2004.005298

Takanashi, C., & Lee, K. J. (2018). Boundary spanning leadership, resource mobilisation, and performance of university-industry R&D projects: a study in a Japanese university. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1490397

Talbot, M. (2004). Monkey see, monkey do: a critique of the competency model in graduate medical education. Medical Education, 38(6), 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01794.x

Testa, M. R., & Sipe, L. (2012). Service-leadership competencies for hospitality and tourism management. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 648-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.08.009

Thach, E., & Thompson, K. J. (2007). Trading places: Examining leadership competencies between for-profit vs. public and non-profit leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(4), 356-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437730710752229

Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289-305. doi: 10.2307/255842

Vanderstraeten, J., and Matthyssens, P. (2012). Service-based differentiation strategies for business incubators: Exploring external and internal alignment. Technovation, 32(12), 656-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.09.002

Vedovello, C. (1997). Science parks and university-industry interaction: geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force. Technovation, 17(9), 491-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00027-8

Wart, M. V. (2003). Public‐Sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00281

Westhead, P. (1997). R&D ‘inputs’ and ‘outputs’ of technology‐based firms located on and off Science Parks. R&D Management, 27(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00041

Westhead, P., & Batstone, S. (1998). Independent technology-based firms: the perceived benefits of a science park location. Urban Studies, 35(12), 2197-2219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098983845

Yang, C. H., Motohashi, K., & Chen, J. R. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative?: Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 38(1), 77-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.09.001




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242018000400105



Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Technology Management & Innovation

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2018 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by