The Challenges of Innovation in American Companies: An Executive Ethnographic Investigation
Keywords:corporate innovation, problems, prescriptions, ethnography, executives
AbstractEffective, sustained innovation remains one of the great challenges facing almost every company in America. But research shows that the average firm is failing at innovation most of the time. Using an ethnographic research approach, including field research and depth interviewing, the authors of the paper report what executives revealed as the principal reasons why their companies are struggling with innovation.
ABELL, D. (1980). Defining the Business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
ABERNATHY, W. and Wayne, K. (1974). Limits of the learning curve. Harvard Business Review, September- October, 109-118.
ADOMZDA, G. Allen, M., and Meyer, M.H. (2009). HR practices in corporate ventures: Insights for the field. Working Paper: Northeastern University, Boston, MA, January.
ARMBRECHT, F., Chapas, R., Chappelow, C; Farris, G.; Friga, P.; Hartz, C.; McIlvaine, M.; Postle, S.; Whitwell, G. (2001). Knowledge management in research and development. Research Technology Management, 44 (4), 28-48.
ASSINK, M. (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9 (2), 215-233.
BAGHAI, M., Coley, S., and White D. (1999). The Alchemy of Growth: Practical Insights for Building the Enduring Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Pereus Books.
BAIRD, F., Moore, C. and Jagodzinski, A. (2000). An ethnographic study of engineering design teams at Rolls- Royce aerospace. Design Studies, 21 (4), 333-355.
BURCHARTH, A. and Ulhoi, J. (2011). Structural approaches to organizing for radical innovation in established firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 12, (2) 117-126.
CHRISTENSEN, C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
COHEN, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128-152.
COOPER, R.G. (1990). Stage-Gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, May June, 44-54.
COOPER, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E. (1994). Determinants of timeliness in product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11 (4), 381-396.
COOPER, R.G. (2008). Perspective: The Stage-Gate idea to launch process – Update, what’s New, and NexGen systems. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25 (3), 213-232.
DEMING, E. (1982). Out of Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DODGSON, M., Gann, D, & Salter, A. (2005). Think, Play, Do: Technology and Organization in the Emerging Innovation Process. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
FINE, G. (1993). Ten lies of ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 267-294.
FOSS, L., Lakovleva, T., Kichul, J., Oftedal, E., and Solheim, A. (2011). Taking innovation to market: The role of strategic choice and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 12 (2) 105-116.
FOSTER, R. (1986). Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage. New York: Summit Books.
FOSTER, R. and Kaplan, S. (2001). Creative Destruction, From Built-to-Last to Built-to-Perform. London, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
GERTSNER, L. (2001). Who Says Elephants Can’t Dance. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
HAMMERSLEY, M. and Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London, UK: Routledge.
HENDERSON, R. and Clark, K. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
HESKETT, J., Sasser, W. And Schlesinger, L (1997). The Service Profit Chain. New York: The Free Press.
KANTER, R. (2006). Innovation: The classic traps. Harvard Business Review, November, 73-83.
KATZENBACK, J., and Smith, D. (1993). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. New York: Harper Business.
KEELEY, L. (forthcoming). The Taming of the New. LANE, P, Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461– 477.
LEONARD-BARTON, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, (8), 111-
LEONARD-BARTON, D. and Rayport, J. (1997). Spark innovation through empathic design. Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, 102-113.
LEVITT, T. (1975). Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, Sept-Oct.
LOFLAND, J., and Lofland, L. (1995). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
MCDONOUGH III, E., Lin, H, Berdrow, I, and Zack, M. ( 2008). Integrating innovation style and knowledge into strategy. Sloan Management Review, 50 (1), 53-58.
MCGRATH, M. (2000). Product Strategy for High Technology Companies. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw Hill.
MENCHIN, S. (2004). Why big companies can’t invent. Technology Review, May, 56-59.
NORMAN, D., (2000). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
PERREAULT, W, and Leigh, L. (1989). Reliability of nominal based data on qualitative judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, May, 86-97.
RUMELT, R. (1974). Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
SCHRAGE, M. (2000). Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
SHARMA, A. (1999). Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. California Management Review, 41 (3), 146-64.
SHILLING, M.A. and Hill, C.W. (1998). Managing the new product development process: strategic imperatives. Academy of Management Executive, 12 (3), 67-81.
SNOW, C. and Thomas, J. (2007). Field research methods in strategic management: Contributions to theory building and testing. Journal of Management Studies, 31, (4), 457-480.
TABRIZI, B. and Walleigh, R. (1997). Defining next- generation: An inside look. Harvard Business Review, November-December, 116-124.
TEECE, D. (2000). Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
THOMKE, S. and von Hippel, E. (2002), Customers as innovators: A new value to create value. Harvard Business Review, 80, (44), 74-81.
TUCKER, R.B. (2002). Driving Growth through Innovation: How Leading Firms are Transforming their Futures. CA: Berrett-Koehler.
TUSHMAN, M. & O’Reilly, C., (1997). Winning Through Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
ULRICH, K. and Eppinger, S. (2000). Product Design and Development, 2nd Edition. Chicago, IL: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
UTTERBACK, J. (1994). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
VAN DE VEN, A. H., & Engleman, R. (2004). Central problems in managing corporate innovation and entrepreneurship. In Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, 7. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
VON HIPPEL, E., (1988). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
WYCOFF, J. (2004). The Big Ten Innovation Killers. CA: Innovation Network.
ZAHRA, S. and George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27 (2), 185-203
ZOOK, C. (2004). Beyond the Core: Expand your Market without Abandoning your Roots. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).