Determinants of International Technology Transfer: an Empirical Analysis of the Enterprise Europe Network
AbstractThis paper explores the key factors that foster technology transfer within the triad university-industry-government in an international context, i.e., the Enterprise Europe Network (EEN). Based on 71 technological Partnership Agreements (PAs), estimation results indicate that PAs associated to partners that provide their collaborators with the appropriate training in technology transfer-related issues, present substantial past experience in international or technological projects, and participate in extensive networks, are those that achieve better performances in terms of international technology transfer. High levels of formal schooling per se are not a key determinant of international technology transfer; the critical factor is highly educated human resources who receive complementary training in technology transfer issues.
ARVANITIS, S., Woerter, M. (2009). Firms’ transfer strategies with universities and the relationship with firms’ innovation performance, Industrial and Corporate Change, 18 (6), 1067–1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtp029
ARVANITIS, S., Kubli, U., Worter, M. (2005). Determinants of knowledge and technology transfer activities between firms and science institutions in Switzerland: an analysis based on firm data, KOF-Arbeitspapiere/Working Papers 116, December. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.892575
BESSANT, J., Rush, H. (1995). Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer, Research Policy, 24, 97 – 114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-e
BOZEMAN, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory, Research Policy, 29, 627 – 655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00093-1
COHEN, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128 -152. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393553
DUAN, Y., Nie, W., Coakes, E. (2010). Identifying key factors affecting transnational knowledge transfer, Information & Management, 47, 356 – 363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2010.08.003
EC-CIP (2008). European Commission, Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme - Implementation Report 2010, Bruxels: European Commission.
ETZKOWITZ, H. (1998).The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages, Research Policy, 27, 823 – 833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(98)00093-6
ETZKOWITZ, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: the Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government relations, Social Science Information, 42 (3), 293 – 337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002
ETZKOWITZ, H., Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix - university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14, 14-19.
ETZKOWITZ, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29, 109-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4
GIBSON, D. V., Smilor, R. W. (1991). Key variables in technology transfer: a field-study based empirical analysis, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 8, 287 – 312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0923-4748(91)90015-j
GKIKAS, A. (2011). Triple Helix dynamics in peripheral regions: evidence from Wales, in Triple Helix IX International Conference - “Silicon Valley: Global Model or Unique Anomaly?”, 11-14 July 2011.
GLASS, A .J., Saggi, K. (2002). Multinational Firms and Technology Transfer, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104 (4), 495- 513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00298
GOPALAKRISHNAN, S., Santoro, M. D. (2004). Distinguishing between knowledge transfer and technology activities: the role of key organizational factors, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51 (1), 57 – 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tem.2003.822461
KELLER, W. (2004). International Technology Diffusion, Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 752 – 782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0022051042177685
KNELLER, R., Pantea, S., Upward, R. (2010). Does Absorptive capacity affect who benefits from international technology transfer?, in ESTG 2010 Lausanne - Twelfth Annual Conference.
KOHLER, B. M., Rubenstein, A. H., Douds, C. F. (1973). A behavioral study of international technology transfer between the United States and west Germany, Research Policy, 2, 160 – 184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(73)90001-2
LAI, W.- H. (2011). Willingness-to-engage in technology transfer in industry–university collaborations, Journal of Business Research, 64, 1218 – 1223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.026
LAROCHE, E., Amara, N. (2011). Transfer activities among Canadian researchers: Evidence in occupational safety and health, Safety Science, 49, 406 – 415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.10.005
LEE, A. H., Wang, W- M., Lin, T- Y. (2010). An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77, 135 – 150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.002
LEYDESDORFF, L., Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The transformation of university-industry government relations, Electronic Journal of Sociology, 5 (4), at http://www.sociology.org/content/vol005.004/th.html [13 September 2014]
LEYDESDORFF, L., Meyer, M. (2003). Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Scientometrics, 58 (2), 191-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026276308287
MADEUF, B. (1984). International technology transfer and international technology payments: definitions, measurements and firm’ behavior, Research Policy 13(3), 125 – 140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90021-0
MAYER, R. C., Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust, The Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 709 – 734. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
PAPAGIANNIDIS, S., Li, F. (2005). Skills brokerage: A new model for business start-ups in the networked economy, European Management Journal, 23 (4), 471 – 482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.06.002
PAPAGIANNIDIS, S., Li, F., Etzkowitz, H. (2009). Entrepreneurial networks: A Triple Helix approach for brokering human and social capital, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 7 (3), 215 – 235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10843-009-0038-x
REDDY, N., Zhao, L. (1990). International technology transfer: A review, Research Policy, 10, 285 – 307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90015-x
SANTORO, M. D, Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry–university collaborative ventures, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 299 – 319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0923-4748(00)00027-8
SANTORO, M. D., Bierly III, P. E. (2006). Facilitators of knowledge transfer in University- Industry Collaborations: A Knowledge-based perspective, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53 (4), 495 – 507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tem.2006.883707
SHERWOOD, A. L., Covin, J. G. (2008). Knowledge acquisition in university-industry alliances: an empirical investigation from a learning theory perspective, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25 (2), 162 – 179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00292.x
SUNG, T. K., Gibson, D. V., Kang, B- S. (2003). Characteristics of technology transfer in business ventures: the case of Daejeon, Korea, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 70, 449 – 466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1625(02)00360-8
TEECE, D. J. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: the resource cost of transferring technological know-how, The Economic Journal, 87 (346), 242 – 261. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2232084
TEIXEIRA, A. A. C., Mota, L. (2012). A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on University-Industry links, Scientometrics, 93 (3), 719-743. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0823-5
ZAHEER, A., McEvily, B., Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 9 (2), 141 – 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.141
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).