What Motivates Brazilian Academic Researchers to Transfer Technology?
AbstractThis study investigated what motivates Brazilian academic researchers to get involved in University-Industry Technology Transfer (UITT) and deterrents to contributing to this process. The research relied on interviews with experienced academic scientists and managers from four universities in Brazil. Determination, persistence and entrepreneurship, related to motivational types Self-direction and Stimulation, were prominent. Hedonism, Achievement and Power - highlighting a shift in their professional identity - were also observed. Universalism type involved opening career opportunities, awakening and maintaining the interest of students. The major motivational goals were: generate resources, solve problems, professional challenge, personal gains, personal gratification, academic prestige, competition, and solving problems of society. Factors that discouraged researchers were: time required for UITT, lack of incentive, innovation environment, and fear of contravening university rules, among others. Knowledge of motivational profiles of academic scientists favors the development of incentive policies and programs for UITT, helping to attract and retain qualified researchers at Brazilian universities.
BALDINI, N. (2006). University patenting and licensing activity: a review of the literature. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 197-207. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154406781775878
BALDINI, N. (2010). Do royalties really foster university patenting activity? An answer from Italy. Technovation, 30, 109-116. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.007
BALDINI, N. (2011). University patenting: patterns of faculty motivations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23 (2), 103-121. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.543329
BALDINI, N., Grimaldi, R., Sobrero, M. (2007). To patent or no to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics, 70(2), 333-354. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2005.18783536
BERGAMINI, C. (2008). Motivação nas organizações. São Paulo: Atlas.
CALDERA, A., Debande, O. (2010). Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39, 1160-1173. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.016
CLOSS, L., Ferreira, G. C., Sampaio, C. H., Perin, M. G. (2012a). Organizational Factors that Affect the University-Industry Technology Transfer Processes of a Private University. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(1), 104-117. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000100007
CLOSS, L., Ferreira, G. C., Sampaio, C. H., Perin, M. G. (2012b). Intervenientes na Transferência de Tecnologia Universidade-Empresa: o Caso PUCRS. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 16, 59-78. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1415-65552012000100005
CLOSS, L., Ferreira, G. C. A Transferência de Tecnologia Universidade-Empresa no Contexto Brasileiro: uma Revisão de Estudos Científicos Publicados entre os anos 2005 e 2009. Gestão & Produção, 19, 419-432. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-530x2012000200014.
CORRÊA, F. (2007). A patente na universidade: contexto e perspectivas de uma política de geração de patentes na Universidade Federal Fluminense. Master’s Dissertation. Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói.
DALMARCO, G., Dewes, M., Zawislak, P., Padula, A. (2011). Universities’ intellectual property: path for innovation or patent competition? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(3), 159-169. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242011000300012.
D’ESTE, P., Mahdi, S.; Neely, A.; Rentocchini, F. (2012). Inventors and entrepreneurs in academia: what types of skills and experience matter? Technovation, 32, 293-303. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.12.005.
ETZKOWITZ, H. The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal Technology and Globalization, v. 1 p. 64-77, 2004. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00995.x.
FUJINO, A., Stal, E. (2007). Gestão da propriedade intelectual na universidade pública brasileira: diretrizes para licenciamento e comercialização. Revista de Negócios, 12(1), 104-120.
GIMENEZ, A., Bonacelli, M., Carneiro, A. (2012). The Challenges of Teaching and Training in Intellectual Property. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(4). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000400014
GARNICA; L., Torkomian, A.L. (2009). Gestão de Tecnologia em universidades: uma análise do patenteamento e dos fatores de dificuldades e de apoio à transferência de tecnologia no Estado de São Paulo. Gestão & Produção, 16 (4), 624-638. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-530x2009000400011
HOYE, K., Pries, F. (2009). ‘Repeat commercializers’, the ‘habitual entrepeneurs’ of university-industry technology transfer. Technovation, 29, 682-689. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.05.008
JAIN, S., George, G., Maltarich, M. (2009). Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Research Policy, 38, 922-935. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.007
LINK, A., Siegel, D., Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16 (4), 641-655. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.902207
MERRIAM, S. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
PÓVOA, L. (2008). Patentes de universidades e institutos públicos de pesquisa e a transferência de tecnologia para empresas no Brasil. Doctoral Thesis. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte.
PÓVOA, L., Rapini, M. (2010). Technology transfer from universities and public research institutes to firms in Brazil: what is transferred and how the transfer is carried out. Science and Public Policy, 37 (5), 369-379. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/030234210x496619
SANTANA, E., Porto, G. (2009). E agora, o que fazer com essa tecnologia? Um estudo multicaso sobre as possibilidades de transferência de tecnologia na USP-RP. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 13(3), 410-429. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1415-65552009000300005
SIEGEL, D., Waldman, D., Atwater, L., Link, A. (2004). Toward a model of effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115-142. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
TAMAYO, A., Paschoal, T. (2003). A relação da motivação para o trabalho com as metas do trabalhador. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 7(4), 33-54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1415-65552003000400003
THURSBY, J., Fuller, A., Thursby, M. US faculty patenting: inside and outside the university. Research Policy, 38, 14-25, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w13256
THURSBY, J., Thursby, M. (2011). Faculty participation in licensing: implications for research. Research Policy, 40(1), 20-29. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.014
ZAWISLAK, P., Dalmarco, G. (2011). The silent run: new issues and outcomes for university-industry relations in Brazil. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(2), 66-81. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242011000200005
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).