A Study of Culture Dimensions, Organizational Ambidexterity, and Perceived Innovation in Teams

Raul Pelagio Rodriguez, Ma. Regina Melchor Hechanova

Abstract


The impetus to innovate has emphasized the importance of organization’s ability to both explore and explot new ideas or what is referred to as ambidexterity. This study examined ambidexterity as a predictor of teams’ perception of their innovation. It also examined the impact of culture - power distance, uncertainty avoidance, collectivism, masculinity, and short-term orientation IT teams’ explorative and exploitative behaviors. The results also show that team ambidexterity is a predictor of innovation. Power distance is negatively related to explorative behavior. Collectivist characteristics are positively associated with both explorative and exploitative behaviors. Masculine behavior likewise predict more explorative behavior. The results can guide human resource development efforts geared to foster greater innovation within teams in organizations. Keywords: culture; power distance; uncertainty avoidance; collectivism; masculinity; explorative; exploitative; ambidexterity; innovation.

Keywords


culture; power distance; uncertainty avoidance; collectivism; masculinity; explorative; exploitative; ambidexterity; innovation.

Full Text:

PDF [en]

References


AL-HUSSEINI, S, Elbeltagi, I. (2012). The impact of leadership style and knowledge sharing on innovation in Iraqi higher educationiInstitutions. From Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Intellectual Capital. Arcada University of Applied Sciences Helsinki Finland, 23–24 April 2012. Retrieved from http://academic-conferences.org/pdfs/ECIC12-book.pdf

BLEDOW, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M, and Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic

perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2(3), 305-337. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/journal/siopjournal.aspx

CARDINAL, R.N., Aitken, M.R.F. (2006) ANOVA for the behavioral sciences researcher. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

CHANDRASEKARAN, A. (2009). Multiple levels of ambidexterity in managing the innovation- improvement dilemma: Evidence from high technology organizations. University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://purl.umn.edu/54319

CHEN, G., Muller, A. (2010) Measuring Innovation from Different Perspectives. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). Wiley Periodicals, Inc. doi: 10.1002/ert.20279

DAVIS, J.P., Eisenhardt, K. M. (2011) Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 159–201. doi: 10.1177/0001839211428131

DUTTA, S. (2012). The Global Innovation Index 2012. France: INSEAD & World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/economics/gii/gii_2012.pdf

GARCIA-MORALES, V. J., Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M. M., Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. (2012). Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 65, 1040–1050. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296311001007

GATIGNON, H., Tushman, M.L., Smith, W., Anderson, P. (2002). Approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Science, 48(9), 1103–1122. Retrieved from https://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp2001/2001-97.pdf

GOVINDARAJAN, V., Kopalle, P. K. (2006). Disruptiveness of innovations: Measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 189–199. doi: 10.1002/smj.511

GUMUSLUOGLU, L., Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 461–473. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.032

GUMUSLUOGLU, L., Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership and organizational

innovation: The roles of external and internal support for innovation. The Journal for Product Innovation Management, 26, 264–277. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/4532487/Transformational_Leadership_and_Organizational_Innovation_The_Roles_of_Internal_and_External_Support_for_Innovation.

GUPTA, P. (2011). Leading innovation change - The Kotter way. International Journal of Innovation Science, 3(3), 141-150.

HECHANOVA, M. R. M., Escaler, M., Galamay, M.V., and Rodriguez, R. P. (2010). Innovation in Philippine organizations. Center for Organizational Research and Development. Ateneo de Manila University. Unpublished.

HEIFETZ, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press.

HEIFETZ, R. A., Linsky, M. (2002). Leadership on the line. Boston, Ma.: Harvard Business School Publishing.

HOFSTEDE, G., Hofstede, G. J., Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. U.S.A.: McGraw-Hill.

HOUSE, R.J. et al. (eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

HSING-ER Lin. (2010). Effects of strategy, context, and antecedents and capabilities on outcomes of ambidexterity. Netherlands: CenER, Tilburg University.

HSING-ER Lin, McDonough III, E. F. (2011) Investigating the role of leadership and organizational culture in fostering innovation ambidexterity. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(3), 497-509. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2010.2092781

JANSEN, J.J.P., Vera, D., Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 5–18. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008

KOTTER, J. P., Cohen, D.S. (2002). The heart of change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

MOKHBER, M., Wan Ismail, W.K., Vakilbashi, A. (2011). The impact of transformational leadership on organizational innovation moderated by organizational culture. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(6), 504–508. Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/65068883

MUNSHI, N., Oke, A., Ouranam, P., Stafylarakis, M., Towells, S., Moeslein, K., and Neely, A. (2005) Leadership for Innovation :Summary Report from an AIM Management Research Forum In cooperation with the Chartered Management Institute . Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. March 2005. Retrieved from http://www.aimresearch.org/uploads/File/Publications/Academic%20Publications%202/Leadership_for_Innovation.pdf

OHLY, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and

their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 257–279. doi: 10.1002/job.376

O'REILLY III, C. A., Tushman, M. L. (2004) The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, April 2004, 74–81.

PANDEY, S., Sharma, R. R. K. (2009). Organizational factors for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 4(1), 48–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242009000100005

PARTHASARATHY, R., Huang, C., Ariss, S. (2011). Impact of dynamic capability on innovation,value creation and industry leadership. The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/oam-2013-0038

PATTERSON, F., Kerrin, M., Gatto-Roissard, G. (n.d.) Characteristics & behaviors of innovative people in organisations: Literature review. A paper prepared for NESTA Policy and Research Unit (NPRU). London: City University.

POPADIUK, S. (2012) Scale for classifying organizations as explorers, exploiters or ambidextrous. International Journal of Information Management, 32, 75–87. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.07.001

PROBST, G., Raisch, S., Tushman, M.L. (2011). Ambidextrous leadership: Emerging challenges for business and HR leaders. Organizational Dynamics, 40, 326–334. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2011.07.010

QUINN, R.E., Faerman, S. R., Thompson, M. P., McGrath, M. R. (2003). Becoming a master manager: A competency framework. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

ROSING, K., Frese, M., Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014

ROST, J. C. (1993). Leadership for the twenty-first century. Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT.

SCHEIN, E. H. (1996). Culture: the missing concept in organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 229-240. doi: 10.2307/2393715

SCHEIN, E. H. (2004). Organizational cuture and leadership. CA: Jossey-Bass.

SINAR, E.F., Wellins, R.S., Pacione, C. (2011). Creating the conditions for sustainable

Innovation. Development Dimensions International. Retrieved from http://www.ddiworld.com/DDIWorld/media/ trend-research/creatingtheconditionsforsustainableinnovation_tr_ddi.pdf

SIPOS, G.L. (2009). Measuring the innovation projects effectiveness. Megatrend Review, 6(2), 229–238.

TOKARCZYK, T., Appelman, J. (2008). The corporate life cycle: Leading organizations to perpetual life. FMI Quarterly, 4, 52–61. Retrieved from http://www.fminet.com/media/pdf/quarterly/2008_4_whole_issue.pdf

TROMPENAARS, F., Hampden-Turner, C. (2000). Riding the waves of culture. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

TUSHMAN, M. L., Smith, W. K., Binns, A. (2011). The ambidextrous CEO. Harvard Business Review. 89(6), 74–80.

USSAHAWANITCHAKIT, P. (2011). Moderating effects of environment on the strategic leadership, organizational learning, innovation, and performance relationships. Journal of International Business and Economics, 11(2), 45–55.

WANG, C. L. (2010). The Role of Ambidextrous Organizational Culture in Resolving the Exploration Exploitation Paradox in New Product Innovation. Presented in the Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship Conference, 2010, London.

WANG, C. L., Rafiq, M. (2009). Organizational diversity and shared vision: resolving The paradox of exploratory and exploitative learning. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(1), 86–101. doi: 10.1108/14601060910928184

WANG, C.L., Rafiq, M. (2013). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation : a comparative study of UK and Chinese high-tech firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 58-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00832.x

YOO, B. Donthu, N., Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of

cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23, 193–210, 2011. Doi: 10.1080/08961530.2011.578059

ZHENG, W., Khoury A. E., and Grobmeier, C. How do leadership and context matter in R&D team innovation? – A multiple case study. Human Resource Development International, 13(3), 265–283. doi:10.1080/13678868.2010.483816

ZHOU, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-696. Retrieved from http://opeconomica.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/when-job-dissatisfaction-leads-to-creativity.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000300002



Copyright (c)



2017 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by Chimera Innova Group