Element '{http://pkp.sfu.ca}url': 'http://http:/gvaras.org/public/' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:anyURI'.
Element '{http://pkp.sfu.ca}article_galley': This element is not expected. Expected is one of ( {http://pkp.sfu.ca}languages, {http://pkp.sfu.ca}disciplines, {http://pkp.sfu.ca}subjects, {http://pkp.sfu.ca}authors ).
Element '{http://pkp.sfu.ca}article': Missing child element(s). Expected is one of ( {http://pkp.sfu.ca}submission_file, {http://pkp.sfu.ca}pkppublication, {http://pkp.sfu.ca}publication ).
Element '{http://pkp.sfu.ca}issue': Missing child element(s). Expected is ( {http://pkp.sfu.ca}articles ).
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<issue xmlns="http://pkp.sfu.ca" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" published="1" current="0" access_status="1" url_path="vol15-1-2020" xsi:schemaLocation="http://pkp.sfu.ca native.xsd">
<id type="internal" advice="ignore">98</id>
<issue_identification>
<volume>15</volume>
<number>1</number>
<year>2020</year>
</issue_identification>
<date_published>2020-05-29</date_published>
<last_modified>2020-05-29</last_modified>
<sections>
<section review_form_id="6" ref="ART" seq="4" editor_restricted="0" meta_indexed="1" meta_reviewed="1" abstracts_not_required="0" hide_title="0" hide_author="0" abstract_word_count="0">
<id type="internal" advice="ignore">1</id>
<abbrev locale="en_US">ART</abbrev>
<abbrev locale="es_ES">ART</abbrev>
<policy locale="en_US"><h2>Definition</h2>
<p>The Research Papers section is dedicated to publishing original, high-quality research articles that contribute new and significant knowledge to the field of innovation management. This section aims to promote the advancement of knowledge through rigorous empirical, theoretical, and methodological studies.</p>
<h2>Objectives and Scope</h2>
<p>The primary objective of this section is to provide a forum for the dissemination of innovative and high-quality research in the field of innovation management. Articles should address a wide range of topics related to innovation, including but not limited to innovation theories, innovation management practices and strategies, and the impact of innovation on organizational performance.</p>
<h2>Acceptance Criteria</h2>
<p>To be considered for publication, manuscripts must meet the following criteria:</p>
<ol>
<li class="show">Originality: The work must be original and unpublished, not having been previously published or under consideration in other journals.</li>
<li class="show">Relevance: The topic addressed must be relevant and of interest to the academic and professional community of innovation management.</li>
<li class="show">Methodological Rigor: A high level of methodological rigor and critical analysis is expected in the presented research.</li>
<li class="show">Contribution: The article must make a significant contribution to existing knowledge, either through the development of new theories, innovative practices, or novel methodologies.</li>
<li class="show">Clarity and Coherence: The manuscript should be well-structured, clearly written, and follow the journal's format and style guidelines.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Manuscript Structure and Guidelines</h2>
<p>Manuscripts should adhere to the general structure of academic research articles, including the following sections:</p>
<ol>
<li class="show">Title: Clear and concise, reflecting the main content and contribution of the article.</li>
<li class="show">Abstract: A summary of up to 250 words briefly describing the objective, methodology, main results, and conclusions.</li>
<li class="show">Keywords: 4-6 keywords representing the main topics of the article.</li>
<li class="show">Introduction: Context of the study, research problem, objectives, and relevance of the work.</li>
<li class="show">Literature Review: Critical analysis of existing literature, identifying gaps and justifying the need for the study.</li>
<li class="show">Methodology: Detailed description of the research design, data collection and analysis methods, and justification of methodological choices.</li>
<li class="show">Results: Clear and concise presentation of findings, supported by tables and figures when necessary.</li>
<li class="show">Discussion: Interpretation of results in the context of existing literature, theoretical and practical implications, and study limitations.</li>
<li class="show">Conclusions: Summary of main findings, study contributions, and suggestions for future research.</li>
<li class="show">References: Complete list of all sources cited in the article, following the APA citation style.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Word Count and References</h2>
<p>Research Papers should be concrete, concise, and not exceed 8,000 words, with approximately 30 references (suggestion).</p></policy>
<title locale="en_US">Research Articles</title>
<title locale="es_ES">Research Articles</title>
</section>
<section review_form_id="6" ref="CAS" seq="5" editor_restricted="0" meta_indexed="1" meta_reviewed="1" abstracts_not_required="0" hide_title="0" hide_author="0" abstract_word_count="0">
<id type="internal" advice="ignore">6</id>
<abbrev locale="en_US">CAS</abbrev>
<abbrev locale="es_ES">CAS</abbrev>
<policy locale="en_US"><h1>Case Studies Section Policy</h1>
<h2>Definition</h2>
<p>Case Studies are articles that provide a detailed and in-depth analysis of specific situations, events, or phenomena in the field of innovation management. These studies focus on practical, real-world examples to extract lessons, identify challenges, and propose innovative solutions. Case Studies are valuable for connecting theory with practice and providing practical insights to professionals and academics.</p>
<h2>Objectives and Scope</h2>
<p>The primary objective of this section is to publish case studies that offer a detailed understanding of the application of innovation theories and practices in real-world contexts. Articles should present critical analyses and reflections on how organizations manage innovation, the challenges faced, and the solutions implemented. Case studies from various sectors, regions, and organization sizes are accepted.</p>
<h2>Acceptance Criteria</h2>
<p>To be considered for publication, manuscripts must meet the following criteria:</p>
<ol>
<li class="show">Practical Relevance: The case study must address a relevant topic of interest to the academic and professional community of innovation management.</li>
<li class="show">Analytical Rigor: A high level of critical analysis and reflection on the presented facts is expected.</li>
<li class="show">Contribution: The article must offer valuable insights and practical lessons that can be applied in other contexts.</li>
<li class="show">Clarity and Coherence: The manuscript should be well-structured, clearly written, and follow the journal's format and style guidelines.</li>
<li class="show">Evidence and Documentation: Studies must be well-documented, providing solid evidence to support the conclusions.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Manuscript Structure and Guidelines</h2>
<p>Manuscripts should adhere to the general structure of academic case studies, including the following sections:</p>
<ol>
<li class="show">Title: Clear and concise, reflecting the main content and contribution of the article.</li>
<li class="show">Abstract: A summary of up to 250 words briefly describing the objective, context, main findings, and conclusions.</li>
<li class="show">Keywords: 4-6 keywords representing the main topics of the article.</li>
<li class="show">Introduction: Context of the study, objectives, and relevance of the analyzed case.</li>
<li class="show">Case Context: Detailed description of the organizational context, including industry, environment, and involved actors.</li>
<li class="show">Methodology: Description of the approach and methods used to collect and analyze case information.</li>
<li class="show">Case Analysis: Detailed presentation of key events, decisions, processes, and outcomes of the case.</li>
<li class="show">Discussion: Interpretation of findings in the context of existing literature, theoretical and practical implications, and lessons learned.</li>
<li class="show">Conclusions: Summary of main findings, study contributions, and suggestions for future research and practice.</li>
<li class="show">References: Complete list of all sources cited in the article, following the APA citation style.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Word Count and References</h2>
<p>Case Studies should be between 4,000 and 6,000 words, with a maximum of 30 references (suggestion).</p></policy>
<title locale="en_US">Case Studies</title>
<title locale="es_ES">Case Studies</title>
</section>
<section review_form_id="6" ref="REV" seq="6" editor_restricted="0" meta_indexed="1" meta_reviewed="1" abstracts_not_required="0" hide_title="0" hide_author="0" abstract_word_count="0">
<id type="internal" advice="ignore">5</id>
<abbrev locale="en_US">REV</abbrev>
<abbrev locale="es_ES">REV</abbrev>
<policy locale="en_US"><h1>Review Papers Section Policy</h1>
<h2>Definition</h2>
<p>Review Papers are articles that provide a comprehensive and critical analysis of the existing literature on a specific topic within the field of innovation management. These articles synthesize findings from previous research, identify trends, knowledge gaps, and propose new directions for future research. Reviews may encompass both narrative reviews and systematic reviews, including meta-analyses.</p>
<h2>Objectives and Scope</h2>
<p>The primary objective of this section is to publish high-quality reviews that integrate and synthesize existing knowledge in the field of innovation management. Articles should offer a comprehensive overview of a topic, highlight important advances, and identify opportunities for future research. This section accepts reviews addressing relevant theories, methodologies, practices, and empirical studies.</p>
<h2>Acceptance Criteria</h2>
<p>To be considered for publication, manuscripts must meet the following criteria:</p>
<ol>
<li class="show">Comprehensiveness: The review must comprehensively cover the relevant literature on the topic.</li>
<li class="show">Relevance: The topic addressed must be pertinent and of interest to the academic and professional community of innovation management.</li>
<li class="show">Analytical Rigor: A high level of critical analysis and synthesis of the reviewed literature is expected.</li>
<li class="show">Contribution: The article must make a significant contribution to existing knowledge by providing new perspectives and suggestions for future research.</li>
<li class="show">Clarity and Coherence: The manuscript should be well-structured, clearly written, and follow the journal's format and style guidelines.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Manuscript Structure and Guidelines</h2>
<p>Manuscripts should adhere to the general structure of academic review articles, including the following sections:</p>
<ol>
<li class="show">Title: Clear and concise, reflecting the main content and contribution of the article.</li>
<li class="show">Abstract: A summary of up to 250 words briefly describing the objective, approach, main findings, and conclusions.</li>
<li class="show">Keywords: 4-6 keywords representing the main topics of the article.</li>
<li class="show">Introduction: Context of the study, review objectives, and relevance of the topic.</li>
<li class="show">Review Methodology: Description of the approach used to select and analyze the literature (especially important for systematic reviews and meta-analyses).</li>
<li class="show">Literature Review and Synthesis: Critical analysis and synthesis of findings from previous research.</li>
<li class="show">Critical Discussion: Interpretation of findings in the context of existing literature, identification of gaps, and suggestions for future research.</li>
<li class="show">Conclusions: Summary of main findings and study contributions.</li>
<li class="show">References: Complete list of all sources cited in the article, following the APA citation style.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Word Count and References</h2>
<p>Review Papers should not exceed 9,000 words and 50 references (suggestion).</p></policy>
<policy locale="es_ES"><p>Reviews are articles that summarize and analyze a topic of importance to the Journal of Technology Management &amp; Innovation. Only reviews that contribute to the literature will be accepted, and bibliometric reviews that only describe the literature on a specific topic will not be accepted. Readers should be able to learn what is known and what questions remain unresolved about the subject.&nbsp; Reviews should include an introduction to the problem or issue, including why the topic is of interest, and a discussion of the issues or new information as they are related to the topic of technology management &amp; innovation.</p>
<p>The body of the review may be subdivided using headings that describe the major ideas being discussed. Reviews should cite suitable references to document statements that are not considered general knowledge and may also provide a list of printed and/or electronic resources for further information.</p></policy>
<title locale="en_US">Review</title>
<title locale="es_ES">Review</title>
</section>
</sections>
<issue_galleys xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://pkp.sfu.ca native.xsd"/>
</issue>