“We are a Motley Crew” Career Presentations of Men and Women Working at the University-Industry-Interface
AbstractEntrepreneurial activities of faculty have received increasing attention in research. In contrast, little is known about the careers and activities of the women and men working at the university-industry-interface. To close this gap, in this paper we address technology transfer as an emerging occupational field and examine the careers of the people working in the field. At the example of Germany we show that technology transfer is almost perfectly gender balanced on the surface. Between and within transfer organizations, however, there are marked gender differences. Against this background, we find a ‘motley crew’ with a diversity of disciplinary backgrounds and professional experiences. While women often consider working in technology transfer temporary in nature and ‘second best’ when compared to a career in science, men display their career in an entrepreneurial spirit. Our results also suggest that women’s opportunities and gains are fragile because of the still transitory nature of the field.
BARON, J.N., Hannan, M.T., Hsu, G., Kocak, O. (2002). Gender and the Organization- Building Process in Young High- Tech Firms. Pp. 245- 273. In: Guillén, M.F., Collins, R., England, P., Meyer M. (eds). The New Economic Sociology , Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
BARON, J.N., Hannan, M.T., Hsu, G., Kocak, Ö. (2007). In the Company of Women. Gender Inequality and the Logic of Bureaucracy in Start- Up Firms. Work and Occupations, 34, 35- 66.
CORLEY, E., Gaughan, M. (2005). Scientists´ Participation in University Research Centers: What are the Gender Differences? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 371- 381.
CROSBY, O. (2002). New and Emerging Occupations. Occupational Outlook Quarterly, Fall 2002, 17- 25.
CRESPI, G.A., Geuna, A., Nesta, L. (2007). The Mobility of University Investors in Europe. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 195- 215.
ETZKOWITZ, H., Fuchs, S., Gupta, N., Kemelgor, C., Ranga, M. (2008). The Coming Gender Revolution in Science. Pp. 403- 428. In: Hacket, E.J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., Wajcman, J. (eds.). The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition. MIT Press Cambridge.
FUCHS, S., Stebut, J., Allmendinger, J. (2001). Gender, Science, and Scientific Organisations in Germany. Minerva, 39, S.175- 201.
KRÜCKEN, G. (2003). Learning the ´New, New Thing´: On the Role of Path Dependency in University Structures. Higher Education, 46, 315- 339.
KRÜCKEN, G., Meier, F., Müller, A. (2007). Information, cooperation and the blurring of boundaries - technology transfer in German and American discourses. Higher Education, 53, 675- 696.
LEGAULT, M.- J., Chasserio, S. (2006). La gestion de projet dans les services technologiques aux enterprises et ses effets différenciés selon le genre. Regards sur le travail, 2/3, 2- 18.
LEYDESDORFF, L., Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. Science and Public Policy, 25, 195- 203.
MARKMAN, G.D., Gianiodis, P.T., Phan P.H., Balkin, D.B. (2005). Innovation speed: Transferring University Technology to Market. Research Policy, 34, 1058- 1075.
MEUSER, M., Nagel, U. (1994). Expertenwissen und Experteninterview. Pp. 180- 192. In: Hitzler, R., Honer, A., Maeder, Chr. (ed.). Expertenwissen . Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen.
MOYSER, G. (1988). Non- standardized Interviewing in Elite Research. Studies in Qualitative Methodology , 1, 109- 136.
MURRAY, F., Graham, L. (2007). Buying Science and Selling Science: Gender Differences in the Market for Commercial Science. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 657- 689.
OWEN- SMITH, J. (2007). Where Does the Professional Knowledge Come From? Licensing Talk, Problem Resolution, and Rationalization in University Technology Transfer . Unpublished manuscript.
ROTHAERMEL, F.T., Agung, S.D., Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 691- 791.
SIEGEL, D.S., Waldman, D.A. Link, A.N. (2003). Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study. Research Policy, 32, 27- 48.
SIEGEL, D.S., Wright, M., Locke, A. (2007). The Rise of Entrepreneurial Activity at Universities: Organizational and Societal Implications. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 489- 504.
SMITH- DOERR, L. (2004a). Women´s Work: Gender Equality vs. Hierarchy in the Life Sciences . Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO.
SMITH- DOERR, L.l (2004b). Flexibility and Fairness: Effects of the Network Form of Organization on Gender Equity in Life Science Careers. Sociological Perspectives , 47, 25- 54.
STEPHAN, P.E., El- Ganainy, A. (2007). The Entrepreneurial Puzzle: Explaining the Gender Gap. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 475- 487.
THURSBY, J.G., Thursby, M.C. (2005). Gender Patechnology transfererns of Research and Licensing Acitivity of Science and Engineering Faculty. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 343- 353.
THURSBY, J., Fuller, A.W., Thursby, M. (2009). US Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University. Research Policy, 38, 14- 25.
VALGAEREN, E. (2005). Gender Aspects of the Nomadic Career: Career Trajectories in the ICT- sector . http://uhdspace.uhasselt.be/dspace/handle/1942/911.
WHITTINGTON, B.W., Smith- Doerr, L. (2005). Gender and Commercial Science: Women´s Patenting in the Life Sciences. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30, 355- 370.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).