¿Cómo Innovan las Empresas Españolas? Una Evidencia Empírica
AbstractThis paper investigates the determinants of firms’ innovative performance, by exploring the effects of different innovation strategies related to generation and acquisition of technological knowledge. The analysis is based on a sample of 1329 Spanish manufacturing firms. The results suggest that R&D contracting has not significant effect on firms’ innovative performance and that cooperation with external agents has a limited effect. In contrast, the development of in-house R&D activities seems to be the most important strategy to introduce new products onto the market. These results warns against the risk of overrating external knowledge sourcing, and highlight the need for policy makers to establish innovation policies mainly focus on strengthening the technological capabilities of firms.
ACS, Z.J., & Audretsch, DB. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. American Economic Review 78, 678-690
BAPTISTA, R., & Swann, R (1998). Do firms in cluster innovate more?. Research Policy 27, 525-540.
BAYONA, C, García,T., & Huerta, E. (2002). Collaboration in R & D with universities and research centres: an empirical study of Spanish firms. R & D Management, 32, 321 -341.
BENEITO, R (2003).Choosing among alternative technological strategies: An empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation. Research Policy, 32,693-713.
BÖNTE,W. (2003). R & D and productivity: Internal vs external R & D - evidence from West German manufacturing industries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12, 343-360.
BRESCHI, S., & Malerba, F. (1997). Sectoral systems of innovation. In Edquist, C. (Ed.), Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter.
CASTRO, E., & Fernández, I. (2006). La I+D empresarial y sus relaciones con la investigación pública española, in: Sebastián, J., Muñoz, E. (Eds.), Radiografía de la investigación pública en España. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, pp. 349-372.
CALOGHIROU,Y, Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas,A. (2004). Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitutes for innovative performance?. Technovation, 24,29-39.
CASSIMAN, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 52,68-82.
COHEN,W. (1995). Empirical studies of innovative activity. In Stoneman, R (ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford: Blackwel.
COOMBS, R. (1996). Core competences and the strategic management of R & D. R & D Management, 26, 345-355.
COOKE R, & Morgan, K. (1998).The creative milieu: a regional perspective on innovation. In: Dodgson, M., Rothwell, R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 25-32.
EVANGELISTA, R. (1999). Knowledge and investment. The sources of innovation in industry, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
FREEL, M. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research Policy 32, 751 -770.
GREENE,W.H. (1993). Econometric Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
HAAS, M., & Hansen, M., (2005). When using knowledge can hurt performance:The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1-24.
HAGEDOORN J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371-385.
HOWELLS J. (1999). Regional systems of innovation?. ln:Archibugi, D., Howeils, J., Michie, J. (eds.), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KAMIEN, M., & Schwartz, N. (1982). Market structure and innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LUNDVALL, B-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
MACPHERSON. A.D. (1997).A comparison of within-firm and external sources of product innovation. Growth and Change, 28, 289-308.
MAIRESSE J., & Mohnen, R (2005).The importance of R & D for innovation: a reassessment using French survey data. Journal of Technology Transfer 30, (1-2), 183-197.
MANNING, W.G, Duan, N., & Rogers, W.H., (1987). Monte Cario evidence on the choice between sample selection and two-part models. Journal of Econometrics, 35,59-82.
MARCH J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organization learning. Organization Science 2,71-87.
MIOTTI, L, & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R & D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy 32, 1481-1499.
NARULA, R. (2001). Choosing between internal and non-internal R & D activities: some technological and economic factors. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 13, (3), 365-387.
NELSON, R. (2000). National innovation systems. In Acs, Z., (Ed.), Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change. London: Pinten pp- 11 -26.
OERLEMANS, L, Meeus, M., & Boekema, F. (1998). Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the economic network approach in analysing innovation. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 89,298-309.
PAVITT, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change. Research Policy 13,343-373.
REICHSTEIN J, & Salter,A. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 15,653-682.
STERNBERG, R. (2000). Innovation networks and regional de-velopment- evidence from European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS): theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue. European Planning Studies 8, 389-407.
TEECE, D. (1992). Competition, cooperation and innovation. Journal of Economic behaviour and Organization 18, 1-25.
VEGA-JURADO, J.,Gutierrez-Gracia,A., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., & Manjarrés-Henríquez, L (2008).The effect of external and internal factors on firms' product innovation. Research Policy 37, 616-632.
VEUGELERS, R., & Cassiman B. (1999). Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 28 63-80.
VON HIPPEL, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).