El papel de la Cooperación para Desarrollar Innovación Tecnológica en la PYME


  • Mauricio Castillo-Vergara Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Alberto Hurtado https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-6497
  • Enrique Aranibar Torres Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial Universidad de La Serena




Innovación, Cooperación Académica, Desempeño, I D intramuro, I D extramuro, Financiamiento estatal, Intermedicación de la innovación.


La innovación se ha consolidado como una vía para mejorar el desempeño de las economías. El objetivo del estudio es analizar el rol de las cooperaciones y los efectos en la innovación tecnológica y el desempeño de las empresas aplicando PLS-SEM. Para probar el modelo se utilizó la décima encuesta de innovación del Ministerio de Economía de Chile, levantada durante el año 2017. Los resultados muestran que la cooperación comercial y cooperación profesional tienen efecto en la innovación tecnológica, sin embargo, la cooperación académica no produce efecto significativo. Se han identificado acciones que permitan mejorar el sistema de innovación.


Download data is not yet available.


Abdul-Halim, H., Ahmad, N. H., Geare, A., & Thurasamy, R. (2019). Innovation Culture in SMEs: The Importance of Organizational Culture, Organizational Learning and Market Orientation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 9(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0014

Acuna-Opazo, C., & Castillo-Vergara, M. (2018). Barriers to non-technological innovation : Impact on business performance in an emerging economy. Contaduria y Administración, 63(3), 1–22.

Akdoğan, A. A., & Cingšz, A. (2012). An Empirical Study on Determining the Attitudes of Small and Medium Sized Businesses (SMEs) Related to Coopetition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.999

Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2018). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2016-0568

Atalay, M., Anafarta, N., & Sarvan, F. (2013). The Relationship between Innovation and Firm Performance: An Empirical Evidence from Turkish Automotive Supplier Industry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.026

Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal computer adoption and usa as an ilustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309.

Barrie, J., Zawdie, G., & João, E. (2019). Assessing the role of triple helix system intermediaries in nurturing an industrial biotechnology innovation network. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.287

Barroso, C., Cepeda Carrión, G., & Roldán, J. L. (2010). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares (pp. 427–447). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8

Barroso Simao, L., Gouveia Rodrigues, R., & Madeira, M. J. (2016). External relationships in the organizational innovation. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(3), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.002

Basco, R., & Calabrò, A. (2016). Open innovation search strategies in family and non-family SMEs. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 29(3), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-07-2015-0188

Ben Arfi, W., Hikkerova, L., & Sahut, J. M. (2018). External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129(January), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.017

Benavente, J. M. (2007). The role of research and innovation in promoting productivity in chile. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4–5), 301–315.

Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2016). A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.003

Bolívar-Cruz, A., Fernández-Monroy, M., & Galván-Sánchez, I. (2017). La cooperación tecnológica universidad-empresa: El rol de la comunicación. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 12(3), 67–77.

Casanova, L., Cornelius, P. K., & Dutta, S. (2017). Global Innovation Competitiveness: How Emerging Economies Compare * *The contributions of Rafael Reynoso, Jordan Litner, Bruno Lanvin, Sacha Wunsch-Vincent, and Francesca Guadagno are gratefully acknowledged. Financing Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804025-6.00002-2

Castillo-Vergara, M., Barrios Galleguillos, N., Jofré Cuello, L., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Acuña-Opazo, C. (2018). Does socioeconomic status influence student creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29(May), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.005

Cepeda Carrión, G., & Roldán Salgueiro, J. L. (2004). Aplicando en la práctica la técnica PLS en la administración de empresas.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 295–336).

Chin, W. W. (2010). Handbook of Partial Least Squares. How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8

Chou, H. H., & Zolkiewski, J. (2018). Coopetition and value creation and appropriation: The role of interdependencies, tensions and harmony. Industrial Marketing Management, 70(August 2017), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.014

CORFO. (2013). Memoria Corfo 2010-2013.

Crespell, P., & Hansen, E. (2008). Work climate , innovativeness , and firm performance in the US forest sector : in search of a conceptual framework. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38(7), 1703–1715. https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-027

Crespi, G., & Zuniga, P. (2012). Innovation and Productivity : Evidence from Six Latin American Countries. World Development, 40(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010

Dorn, S., Schweiger, B., & Albers, S. (2016). Levels, phases and themes of coopetition: A systematic literature review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 34(5), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.009

Edwards-Schachter, M. (2018). The nature and variety of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(2), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2018.08.004

Ferreira, J., Coelho, A., & Moutinho, L. (2018). Technovation Dynamic capabilities , creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and fi rm performance : The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Technovation, (Febrero 2018), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.11.004

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcrar.2016.409.006

Fossas-olalla, M., Minguela-rata, B., & Fernández-menéndez, J. (2015). Product innovation : When should suppliers begin to collaborate ? ☆. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1404–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.022

Frank, F. R., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560050910

Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling and Regression : Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(August), 1–79. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407

Geldes, C., & Felzensztein, C. (2013). Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración Marketing innovations in the agribusiness sector Article information : Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 26(1), 108–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-09-2015-0253

Geldes, C., Felzensztein, C., & Palacios-Fenech, J. (2017). Technological and non-technological innovations, performance and propensity to innovate across industriesThe case of an emerging economy. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.010

Genc, E., Dayan, M., & Genc, O. F. (2019). The impact of SME internationalization on innovation: The mediating role of market and entrepreneurial orientation. Industrial Marketing Management, (December 2018), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.008

Giannopoulou, E., Barlatier, P. J., & Pénin, J. (2019). Same but different? Research and technology organizations, universities and the innovation activities of firms. Research Policy, 48(1), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.008

Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2011). Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 650–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.009

Guimón, J., Chaminade, C., Maggi, C., & Salazar-Elena, J. C. (2018). Policies to Attract R&D-related FDI in Small Emerging Countries: Aligning Incentives With Local Linkages and Absorptive Capacities in Chile. Journal of International Management, 24(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2017.09.005

Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

Hair Jr., J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, G. V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-10-2013-0128

Hashi, I., & Nebojsa, S. (2013). The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model : Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. Research Policy, 42, 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.011

Heidenreich, S., Landsperger, J., & Spieth, P. (2016). Are Innovation Networks in Need of a Conductor? Examining the Contribution of Network Managers in Low and High Complexity Settings. Long Range Planning, 49(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.03.003

Henseler, J. (2016). Some inconvenient truths about PLS path modeling. 9th International Conference on PLS and Related Methods (PLS’16), (June), 74–76.

Henseler, J. (2018). Partial least squares path modeling: Quo vadis? Quality and Quantity, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0689-6

Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304

Heredia, J. A., Geldes, C., Kunc, M. H., & Flores, A. (2019). Technovation New approach to the innovation process in emerging economies : The manufacturing sector case in Chile and Peru. Technovation, 79(March 2016), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.012

Heredia Pérez, J. A., Geldes, C., Kunc, M. H., & Flores, A. (2019). New approach to the innovation process in emerging economies: The manufacturing sector case in Chile and Peru. Technovation, 79(March 2018), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.012

Höflinger, P. J., Nagel, C., & Sandner, P. (2017). Reputation for technological innovation: Does it actually cohere with innovative activity? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.08.002

Howell, A. (2017). Picking ‘winners’’ in China: Do subsidies matter for indigenous innovation and firm productivity?’ China Economic Review, 44(71603009), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.04.005

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Hughes, P., Souchon, A. L., Nemkova, E., Hodgkinson, I. R., Oliveira, J. S., Boso, N., … Sy-Changco, J. (2018). Quadratic effects of dynamic decision-making capability on innovation orientation and performance: Evidence from Chinese exporters. Industrial Marketing Management, (October 2017), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.005

Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas. (2018). Décima Encuesta de Innovación en Empresas 2015-2016.

Intarakumnerd, P., & Goto, A. (2018). Role of public research institutes in national innovation systems in industrialized countries: The cases of Fraunhofer, NIST, CSIRO, AIST, and ITRI. Research Policy, 47(7), 1309–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.011

Iturrioz, C., Aragón, C., & Narvaiza, L. (2015). How to foster shared innovation within SMEs ’ networks : Social capital and the role of intermediaries. European Management Journal, 33(2), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.09.003

Jia, J., & Ma, G. (2017). Do R&D tax incentives work? Firm-level evidence from China. China Economic Review, 46(August), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.08.012

Karabulut, A. T. (2015). Effects of Innovation Types on Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1355–1364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.322

Klerkx, L., Álvarez, R., & Campusano, R. (2015). The emergence and functioning of innovation intermediaries in maturing innovation systems: the case of Chile. Innovation and Development, 5(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2014.921268

Laforet, S. (2013). Organizational innovation outcomes in SMEs: Effects of age, size, and sector. Journal of World Business, 48(4), 490–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.09.005

Lafuente, E., Leiva, J. C., Moreno-Gómez, J., & Szerb, L. (2019). A non-parametric analysis of competitiveness efficiency: The relevance of firm size and the configuration of competitive pillars. BRQ Business Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2019.02.002

Lavoie, C., Lavoie, C., Abdulnour, G., Lavoie, C., & Abdulnour, G. (2015). ScienceDirect define a a creative creative SME How to to define define a a creative creative SME creative. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 910–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.199

Lin, J. Y. (2017). Balancing industry collaboration and academic innovation: The contingent role of collaboration-specific attributes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.016

Lindström, T., & Polsa, P. (2016). Coopetition close to the customer - A case study of a small business network. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.06.005

Liu, D., Chen, T., Liu, X., & Yu, Y. (2018). Do more subsidies promote greater innovation? Evidence from the Chinese electronic manufacturing industry. Economic Modelling, (November). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.11.027

Liu, W., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2018). Enhancing product innovation performance in a dysfunctional competitive environment: The roles of competitive strategies and market-based assets. Industrial Marketing Management, 73(December 2016), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.006

Luo, L., Yang, Y., Luo, Y., & Liu, C. (2016). Export, subsidy and innovation: China’s state-owned enterprises versus privately-owned enterprises. Economic and Political Studies, 4(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2016.1180766

Martelo-Landroguez, S., Cegarra Navarro, J. G., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2019). Uncontrolled counter-knowledge: its effects on knowledge management corridors. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 00(00), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1599497

Modrego, F., Mccann, P., Foster, W. E., & Olfert, M. R. (2015). Regional entrepreneurship and innovation in Chile : a knowledge matching approach. Small Business Economics, 44, 685–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9612-2

Müller, T., Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (2018). PLS path modeling – a confirmatory approach to study tourism technology and tourist behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 9(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-09-2017-0106

OECD/European Communities. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Publications de l’OCDE.

Park, B. J. R., Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2014). Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.003

Perkins, G., Lean, J., & Newbery, R. (2017). The Role of Organizational Vision in Guiding Idea Generation within SME Contexts. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12206

Radziwon, A., & Bogers, M. (2018). Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.021

Rajapathirana, R. P. J., & Hui, Y. (2017). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002

Raposo, M. L., Ferreira, J. J. M., & Fernandes, C. I. (2014). Local and cross-border SME cooperation: Effects on innovation and performance. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de La Empresa, 23(4), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2014.08.001

Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Md Noor, S., Schuberth, F., & Jaafar, M. (2019). Investigating the effects of tourist engagement on satisfaction and loyalty. Service Industries Journal, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2019.1570152

Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001

Resende, L. M. M. de, Volski, I., Betim, L. M., Carvalho, G. D. G. de, Barros, R. de, & Senger, F. P. (2018). Critical success factors in coopetition: Evidence on a business network. Industrial Marketing Management, 68(November 2017), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.10.013

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2017). SmartPLS—Statistical Software For Structural Equation Modeling.

Rojas, M. G. A., Solis, E. R. R., & Zhu, J. J. J. (2018). Innovation and network multiplexity: R&D and the concurrent effects of two collaboration networks in an emerging economy. Research Policy, 47(6), 1111–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.018

Roldán, J. L., Sánchez-Franco, M. J., & Real, J. C. (2017). From frequency of use to social integration: The mediation of routinization and infusion in Tuenti community. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(2), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.07.002

Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Journal of Business Venturing Is innovation always bene fi cial ? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002

Santi, C., & Santoleri, P. (2017). Exploring the link between innovation and growth in Chilean firms. Sma, 49, 445–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9836-4

Sarooghi, H., Libaers, D., & Burkemper, A. (2015). Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 714–731. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.12.003

Scandura, A. (2016). University–industry collaboration and firms’ R&D effort. Research Policy, 45(9), 1907–1922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.009

Schiavone, F., & Simoni, M. (2011). An experience-based view of co-opetition in R&D networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(2), 136–154.

Serrano-Bedia, A. M., López-Fernández, M. C., & García-Piqueres, G. (2018). Complementarity between innovation knowledge sources: Does the innovation performance measure matter? BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 21(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2017.09.001

Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Piovoso, M. J. (2009). Silver Bullet or Voodoo Statistics? Group & Organization Management, 34(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601108329198

Stubrin, L. (2017). Innovation , learning and competence building in the mining industry . The case of knowledge intensive mining suppliers ( KIMS ) in Chile. Resources Policy, 54(October), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.10.009

Szücs, F. (2018). Research subsidies, industry–university cooperation and innovation. Research Policy, 47(7), 1256–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009

Tello Gamarra, J., Machado Leo, R., Silva Avila, A. M., & Wendland, J. (2019). Innovation studies in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 13(4), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242018000400024

Torregrosa-Hetland, S., Pelkonen, A., Oksanen, J., & Kander, A. (2019). The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013. Research Policy, (December 2018), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001

Trigo, A. (2011). Innovación y la importancia de los flujos externos de información: Una propuesta para el análisis de los contactos informales. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 6(2), 62–75.

Ueasangkomsate, P., & Jangkot, A. (2018). Enhancing the innovation of small and medium enterprises in food manufacturing through Triple Helix Agents. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.007

Vivas, C., & Barge-Gil, A. (2015). Impact on firms of the use of knowledge external sources: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 943–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12089

Weber, B., & Heidenreich, S. (2018). When and with whom to cooperate? Investigating effects of cooperation stage and type on innovation capabilities and success. Long Range Planning, 51(2), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.003

Williams, L. J., Vandenberg, R. J., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). 12 structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543–604.

Wold, H. (1984). Systems Analysis by Partial Least Squares. In Measuring the Unmeasurable (pp. 221–252). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.001

Wu, J. (2014). Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.11.002

Xu, L., Peng, X., & Prybutok, V. (2019). Formative measurements in operations management research: Using partial least squares. Quality Management Journal, 26(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2018.1542287

Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30(3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.003



How to Cite

Castillo-Vergara, M., & Torres, E. A. (2019). El papel de la Cooperación para Desarrollar Innovación Tecnológica en la PYME. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 14(4), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242019000400041



Research Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.