Stakeholders’ Contribution towards Responsible Innovation in Information and Communication Technology Research Projects

Tilimbe Jiya


Information and Communication Technology (ICT) research projects engage stakeholders who contribute towards different aspects of research and innovation. One of the aspects that stakeholders contribute towards in ICT research projects is responsibility. There is a need for those engaged in ICT research projects to take into consideration the impacts of their activities on society as part of responsible research and innovation (RRI) through finding solutions to emerging societal problems and developing sustainable processes of carrying out research and innovation. In this paper, the focus is two-fold. Firstly, I focus on understanding how stakeholders are identified to contribute towards responsibility in ICT research projects and secondly, I focus on how stakeholders contribute towards responsibility in such projects. I conducted an interpretive case study in which data were collected by semi-structured interviews with 11 stakeholders from two ICT research projects. Through thematic data analysis, their perceptions and understanding of their contribution towards responsibility were conceived. From the study findings, I established that there are problems in understanding the meaning of term ‘responsibility’ among stakeholders which later affects the identification of roles that deal with it. Despite the ambiguity of the meaning, I found that stakeholders contribute towards responsibility in many ways although there are barriers that affect their contribution.


Responsibility; stakeholder engagement; stakeholder contribution; responsible innovation; ICT research projects

Full Text:



Auhagen, A. E., & Bierhoff, H. W. (2001). Responsibility: The Many Faces of a Social Phenomenon. Routledge.

Blok, V. (2014). Look who’s talking: responsible innovation, the paradox of dialogue and the voice of the other in communication and negotiation processes. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(2), 171–190.

Blok, V., Hoffmans, L., & Wubben, E. F. M. (2015). Stakeholder engagement for responsible innovation in the private sector: critical issues and management practices. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 15(2), 147–164.

Carney, S., Whitmarsh, L., Nicholson-Cole, S. A., & Shackley, S. (2009). A dynamic typology of stakeholder engagement within climate change research. Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research, Working Paper, 128. Retrieved from

Durham, E., Baker, H., Smith, M., Moore, E., & Morgan, V. (2014). The BiodivERsA Stakeholder Engagement Handbook. Paris: BiodivERsA. Retrieved from

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from

Guston, D. H. (2011). Participating Despite Questions: Toward a More Confident Participatory Technology Assessment: Commentary on: “Questioning ‘Participation’: A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment”. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 691–697.

Lenk, H., & Maring, M. (2001). Responsibility: The Many Faces of a Social Phenomenon. (A. E. Auhagen & H. W. Bierhoff, Eds.). Routledge.

Lozano, J. M. (2005). Towards the relational corporation: from managing stakeholder relationships to building stakeholder relationships (waiting for Copernicus). Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(2), 60–77.

Murphy, J., Parry, S., & Walls, J. (2016). The EPSRC’s Policy of Responsible Innovation from a Trading Zones Perspective. Minerva.

Nathan, G. (2015). Innovation process and ethics in technology: an approach to ethical (responsible) innovation governance. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 15(2), 119–134.

Owen, R., Bessant, J. R., & Heintz, M. (Eds.). (2013a). Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Owen, R., Bessant, J. R., & Heintz, M. (Eds.). (2013b). Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.

Pellé, S., & Reber, B. (2015). Responsible innovation in the light of moral responsibility. Journal on Chain and Network Science, 15(2), 107–117.

Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., … Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.

Röbken, H. (2013). Inside the “Knowledge Factory”: Organizational Change in Business Schools in Germany, Sweden and the USA. Deutscher Universitätsverlag. Retrieved from

Stahl, B. C. (2012). Responsible research and innovation in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(3), 207–211.

Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., & Flick, C. (2016). Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies: On the implementation of responsible research and innovation. Science and Public Policy, scw069.

Sullins, J. (2012). Information Technology and Moral Values. Retrieved from

Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. In R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (Eds.), Responsible Innovation. London: John Wiley.

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Technology Management & Innovation

2019 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by