A Bibliometric Study of Innovation Based on Schumpeter

Fábio Lazzarotti, Michael Samir Dalfovo, Valmir Emil Hoffmann

Abstract


The aim of this paper is to analyze the production of the scientific innovation theme, based on the Economical Development Theory. The bibliometric study started from the seven categories derived from Schumpeter's seminal text in articles from the following journals IJIM, JOTMI, RAI and RBI, published in the 2000 decade. Results have shown an increase in eleven new categories in the innovation realm, and the predominant categories are the ones that mention 'organizational resources, capabilities and competencies, knowledge and learning'. The topic 'new product', from Schumpeter's original text, was the third most investigated. We have come to the conclusion that the discussion of the subject innovation is far beyond the cases of innovation shown by his seminal author in the early twentieth century and, even though this may not be a theory of resources, this approach and other ones derived from it - such as the dynamic capabilities approach, the skills approach and the organizational knowledge approach - have now attracted the interest of the academy in recent years.

Keywords


innovation; innovation categories, Schumpeter, bibliometrics.

Full Text:

PDF [en]

References


ANDREWS, E.B. (1890). Macvane’s political economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 4 (3), 331-339.

BERTERO, C.O.; Vasconcelos, F.C.; Binder, M.P. (2003). Estratégia empresarial: a produção científica (...). Revista de Administração de Empresas. 43 (4), 48-62.

CANTÍN, P.V., Montenegro, I.O., Maturana, V.R., (2006). Vigilancia tecnológica aplicada a nanociencia y nanotecnología en países de latinoamérica. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 1 (4), 83-94.

CANTÚ, S.O., Zapata, A.R.P., (2006). ¿Qué es la gestión de la innovación y la tecnología (ginnt)? Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 1 (2), 64-82.

CHRISTENSEN, C.M., Anthony, S.D., Roth, E.A. (2007). O futuro da inovação: usando as teorias da inovação para prever mudanças no mercado. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro.

CHUNG, K. H., Cox, R. A. K. (1990). Patterns of Productivity in the Finance Literature: a study of the bibliometric distributions. Journal of Finance, 45 (1), 301-309.

CROSSAN, M. M.; Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (6), 1154-1191.

DAMANPOUR, F (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42 (5), 693–716.

DOSI, G. (1984). Technical change and industrial transformation. MacMillan, London.

DURISIN, B.; Calabretta, G.; Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The intellectual structure of product innovation research: a bibliometric study of the journal of product innovation management, 1984 –2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (3), 437-451.

FORSMAN, H. (2009). Balancing capability building for radical and incremental innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13 (4), 501-520.

FREEMAN, C. (1982a) Innovation and long cycles of economic development. In: SEMINÁRIO INTERNACIONAL. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas. pp. 1-13.

FREEMAN, C. (1982b) The economics of industrial transformation. Pinter, London.

FURRER, O., Thomas, H., Goussevskaia, A. (2008) The structure and evolution of the strategic management field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10 (1), 1-23.

HERNÁNDEZ, L. M. B. (2009). Una revisión de la interpretación económica sobre la innovación. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 4 (4), 139-149. HISRICH, R. D., PETERS, M. P. (2004) Empreendedorismo. Bookman, Porto Alegre.

IJIM. International Journal Of Innovation Management. Brighton: World Scientific, 1997-2009. Trimestral. http:// www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml. [Accessed july 10,

.

JOTMI. Journal Of Technology Management & Innovation. Chile: JOTMI Research Group, 2005-2009. Trimestral. http://www.JOTMI.org/index.php/GT. [Accessed february

, 2010].

LEIFER, R., O’connor, G. C., Rice, M. (2002). A implementação de inovação radical em empresas maduras. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 42 (2), 17-30.

MALHOTRA, N. K. (2005). Pesquisa de Marketing. Pearson, São Paulo.

McMILLAN, G.St.; Casey, D.L. (2007) Research note: Identifying the invisible colleges of the British Journal of Industrial Relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations,

(4), 815-828.

MENDONÇA Neto, O. R.; Riccio, E. L.; Sakata, M. C. G. (2006) Paradigmas de pesquisa em contabilidade no Brasil. In: Encontro Anual da ANPAD, ANPAD, Salvador. pp 1-16.

MOINGEON, B.; Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2006) Strategic innovation: how to grow in mature markets. European Business Forum, 24, 50-54.

MORETTI, S. L. A.; Figueiredo, J. C. B. (2007) Análise Bibliométrica da Produção sobre Responsabilidade Social das Empresas no ENANPAD. In: Encontro Anual da ANPAD, ANPAD, Rio de Janeiro. pp. 1-16.

MUÑOZ, A.V.; Muñoz, L.R. (2006) Innovación tecnológica forestal, desarrollos y desafios científico tecnológicos en Chile. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation,1 (4), 71-82.

NELSON, R. R.;Winter, S. G. (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Ballknap Press, Cambridge.

ÖBERG, C.; Grundström, C. (2009) Challenges and opportunities in innovative Firms’ network development. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13 (4),593-613.

O’LEARY, D. E.. (2007) The most cited papers. Human Systems Management, 26 (3), 153-156.

OECD. Organização Para Cooperação E Desenvolvimento Econômico.. (2005) Manual de Oslo: diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação. 3.ed. Brasil: Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos – FINEP. http://www.finep.gov.br. [Accessed August 01, 2009].

PENROSE, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Wiley, New York.

PELLISSIER, R. (2008). A conceptual framework for the alignment of innovation and technology. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 3 (3), 67-77.

PRAHALAD, C. K.; Hamel, G. (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 90 (3), 79-91.

RBI. Revista Brasileira De Inovação. São Paulo: UNICAMP, 2002-2008. Semestral. ISSN: 1677-2504. http://www.ige. unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rbi/index. [Accessed March 05,2010].

RAI. Revista De Administração E Inovação. São Paulo: Uninove, 2004-2009. Quadrimestral. ISSN: 1809-2039. ht t p: //w w w.revist a- r ai.inf.br/ojs-2 .1.1/index . php/r ai. [Accessed February 23, 2010].

ROGERS, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press. New York.

SCHUMPETER, J.A. (1934). The theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

SCHUMPETER, J.A.(1942). Capitalism, socialism e democracy. Harper and Row. New York.

SILVA, J.M.P. (2008). O estado-da-arte da literatura em economia e gestão da inovação e tecnologia: um estudo bibliométrico. 77 f. 2008 Tese de Mestrado em Inovação e Empreendedorismo Tecnológico. Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto.

TIDD, J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K. (2008) Gestão da inovação. Bookman. Porto Alegre.

VERGARA, S. C. (2005). Métodos de pesquisa em administração. Atlas. São Paulo.

WALKER, J. (1888) Harvard Law Review, New York. ZHENG, W.; Khoury, A. E.; Grobmeier, C. (2010). How do leadership and context matter in R&D team innovation?– A multiple case study. Human Resource Development International, 13 (3), 265–283.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000400010



Copyright (c)



2017 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias