Uso de los Mapas de Proyectos-Productos para Identificar la Relación entre las Áreas de Fortaleza y de Competencia en un Centro de I&DT

Luis Roberto Vega González

Abstract


Like living beings, all organizations evolve; nevertheless, in the case of complex organizations, their evolutions aren’t natural and must be directed through a strategic management permanent process. The managed evolution determines their strength and competence areas. Understanding the relation between strength and competence areas in complex organizations as the research and development (R&D) institutes and centers, is highly relevant since it requires the system understanding including constitutive elements, actuation areas, and internal and external interrelations. R&D organizations are complex because in them multiple knowledge areas are cultivated and the actuating organizational variables are innumerable. In this paper a method to identify the competence areas of an R&D Mexican university center, is presented. The method is based in the analysis of the organization´s evolution and the financed projects-products maps.

Keywords


strength and competence areas, R&D centers organizational evolution, project-products maps.

Full Text:

PDF [es]

References


BREMSER, Wayne G.; Barsky, Noah P., (2004). Utilizing the balanced scorecard for r&D performance measurement. R&D Management, Jun, Vol. 34 Issue 3, pp.229-238. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

CHOL, D, O., (2005). Productivity measurement and evaluation models with application to a military r&D organisation. International Journal of Technology Management. Vol. 32, Nos. 3/t; pp. 408-436. Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

CHUN-HSIEN Wang, Yang-Chieh Chin, Gwo-Hshiung Tzengg; (2010). Mining the r&D innovation performance processes for high-tech firms based on rough set theory. Technovation. Vol. 30; pp. 447-458. Elsevier.

CONACYT, (2010); Términos de referencia Innovapyme: Disponible en: http://www.conacyt.mx/Estimulos/2009/Terminos-referencia-INNoVAPYME.pdf. Consultado el 8 de mayo de 2010.

CONNELLY, M. C, Dismukes, J. P., Sekhar, J. A., (20II). New relationships between production and patent activity during the high-growth life cycle stage for materials. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol.78 (2), pp. 303-318.

DAVENPORT, Thomas H.; Jarvenpaa, Sirkka L.; Beers, Michael C, (1996). Improving knowledge work processes. Sloan Management Review, summer, Vol. 37 Issue 4, pp.53-65.

DIAZ, P. C, Arechavala V. r., (2007). La operación de centros de investigación y desarrollo tecnológico: claves para su desempeño y consolidación. Memorias del XI Congreso Anual de la Academia de Ciencias Administrativas, ACACIA, 22 al 27 de mayo Guadalajara Jalisco, México.

DOCTOR, R. N., Newton, D. P., Pearson, A., (2001), Managing Uncertainty in r&D. Technovation. Vol. 21; pp.79-90. Elsevier.

GROENVELD, P., (2007). roadmapping integrates business and technology. Research Technology Management. Vol. 50. No. 6; pp.49-58.

HAUSER, john . R, (1998). research, Development, and Engineering Metrics. Management Science, Dec. Part I of 2, Vol. 44 Issue 12, PI670-I689.

HYUkJOON, k., yongtae, P., (2009), Structural effects of r&D collaboration network on knowledge diffusion performance. Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 36, Issue 5; pp. 8986-8992. Elsevier.

DRONGELEN, Inge C. kerssen; Cook, Andrew. (1997) r&D Management, oct, Vol. 27 Issue 4, pp. 345-357. Blac-kwell Publishers Ltd.

MILLEr, R., (1995), Applying quality practices to r&D. Research & Technology Management, March-April pp. 47-53.

PLAN DE DESARROLLO DEL CCADET (2009-2012); disponible en: http://www.ccadet.unam.mx/direccion/plan/PLAN DESArroLLo%2020092QI2.pdf: consultado el 02 de febrero de 2010.

SCHUMANNJ.r, Paul A.; ransley, Derek L., (1995). Measuring r&D Performance. Research Technology Management, May/Jun, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p45, lOp, 5

TELESCOPlOS GEMINIS 600, El CCADET, disponible en: http://www.cinstrum.unam.mx/: consultado 15 de febrero 2010.

VEGA González L. R., Saniger Blesa J. M., (2010), Las diferentes épocas de la investigación aplicada y el desarrollo tecnológico del CCADET, Innovación y Competitividad, Asociación Mexicana de Directivos de la Investigación Aplicada y Desarrollo Tecnológico (ADIAT), A.C., Año VIII, No. 40; pp. 28-36.

WERNER, Bjorn M.; Souder, William E., (1997). Research Technology Management, May/June, Vol. 40 Issue 3, pp. 34-42.

WEST, J., lansati, M., (2003). Experience, experimentation and accumulation of knowledge: the evolution of r&D in the semiconductor industry. Research Policy. Vol. 32; pp. 809-825. Elsevier.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000100010



Copyright (c)



2017 © Universidad Alberto Hurtado - Facultad de Economía y Negocios. 
Erasmo Escala 1835 - Santiago, Chile.
Economic Analysis Review | Observatorio Económico | Gestión y Tendencias 

Journal Supported by Chimera Innova Group